Leveraging blockchain for energy transition in urban contexts

This article explores the potential of leveraging blockchain technology to facilitate energy transition within urban settings. It explores three innovative market models—peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy—which hold promise for a shift in (local) electricity trading due to decentralized and digital transactional characteristics. Utilizing a scenario building framework, this research scrutinizes these market models, their corresponding trading mechanisms, and the advantages and disadvantages of implementing blockchain technology. The results provide valuable insights into investment necessities, market democratization, service quality and reliability, urban governance, civic engagement and citizenry welfare. Consequently, this study offers a novel conceptualization of market models, laying the groundwork for a systematic understanding of blockchain’s potentiality in ecosystem governance in the context of energy transition.

[1]  L. Kiesling,et al.  Emerging Business Models in Local Energy Markets: A Systematic Review of Peer-To-Peer, Community Self-Consumption, and Transactive Energy Models , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  M. Montakhabi What Makes Your Business Model (Un)investable? , 2023, Journal of Business Models.

[3]  Mehdi Montakhabi,et al.  Valuing the value: An affordances perspective on new models in the electricity market , 2023, Energy Research & Social Science.

[4]  R. Yang,et al.  Reviewing global peer-to-peer distributed renewable energy trading projects , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[5]  L. Kiesling,et al.  Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[6]  P. Ballon,et al.  Barriers for Prosumers’ Open Business Models: A Resource-Based View on Assets and Data-Sharing in Electricity Markets , 2022, Sustainability.

[7]  P. Ballon,et al.  Expert Recommendations on Energy Trading Market Models using the AHP model , 2022, 2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[8]  Michael J. Fell,et al.  Social and Economic Value in Emerging Decentralized Energy Business Models: A Critical Review , 2021, Energies.

[9]  Carina Veeckman,et al.  Co-creation and Smart Cities: Looking Beyond Technology , 2021 .

[10]  Thomas Bauwens,et al.  Keep it green, simple and socially fair: A choice experiment on prosumers’ preferences for peer-to-peer electricity trading in the Netherlands , 2021, Energy Policy.

[11]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Best practices for analyzing the direct energy use of blockchain technology systems: Review and policy recommendations , 2021 .

[12]  P. Ballon,et al.  An Ecosystem View of Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading: Scenario Building by Business Model Matrix to Identify New Roles , 2021, Energies.

[13]  Mustafa A. Mustafa,et al.  Fostering Energy Transition in Smart Cities: DLTs for Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading , 2021, 2021 17th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS).

[14]  J. Pierson,et al.  The right to the city and data protection for developing citizen-centric digital cities , 2021, Information, Communication & Society.

[15]  Lucila De Almeida,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Trading and Energy Community in the Electricity Market : Analysing the Literature on Law and Regulation and Looking Ahead to Future Challenges , 2021 .

[16]  S. V. D. Graaf,et al.  Open Business Models’ Actionability in Europe; EU Competition Policy Analysis , 2021 .

[17]  Bart Preneel,et al.  Off-chain state channels in the energy domain , 2021, 2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[18]  Nazli Cila,et al.  The City as a License. Implications of Blockchain and Distributed Ledgers for Urban Governance , 2020, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities.

[19]  B. Sandén,et al.  Is peer-to-peer electricity trading empowering users? Evidence on motivations and roles in a prosumer business model trial in Australia , 2020 .

[20]  Mehdi Montakhabi,et al.  Trust, Transparency and Security in the Sharing Economy: What is the role of the government? , 2020, Technology Innovation Management Review.

[21]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  Sharing Beyond Peer-to-peer Trading: Collaborative (Open) Business Models as a Pathway to Smart Circular Economy in Electricity Markets , 2020, 2020 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS).

[22]  Inte Gloerich,et al.  The Blockchain and the Commons: Dilemmas in the Design of Local Platforms , 2020, CHI.

[23]  Ruzanna Chitchyan,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Energy Markets: Understanding the Values of Collective and Community Trading , 2020, CHI.

[24]  Adrian Mackenzie,et al.  Mapping Platform Urbanism: Charting the Nuance of the Platform Pivot , 2020 .

[25]  Geert Deconinck,et al.  New Roles in Peer-to-Peer Electricity Markets: Value Network Analysis , 2020, 2020 6th IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCon).

[26]  André Hackbarth,et al.  Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading , 2020, Energy Policy.

[27]  Edstan Fernandez,et al.  Multiagent-Based Transactive Energy Management Systems for Residential Buildings With Distributed Energy Resources , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[28]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Trading in Electricity Networks: An Overview , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[29]  Michael Kaisers,et al.  Automated Peer-to-peer Negotiation for Energy Contract Settlements in Residential Cooperatives , 2019, Applied Energy.

[30]  S Balamurugan,et al.  Conceptualizing Blockchain based Energy Market for Self Sustainable Community , 2019, BlockSys@SenSys.

[31]  Jianming Lian,et al.  Performance Evaluation for Transactive Energy Systems Using Double-Auction Market , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  P. Pinson,et al.  Energy Collectives: A Community and Fairness Based Approach to Future Electricity Markets , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[33]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Organizing prosumers into electricity trading communities: Costs to attain electricity transfer limitations and self‐sufficiency goals , 2019, International Journal of Energy Research.

[34]  Pernille Bjørn,et al.  Blockchain Assemblages: Whiteboxing Technology and Transforming Infrastructural Imaginaries , 2019, CHI.

[35]  A.W.G. de Vries,et al.  Renewable Energy Will Not Solve Bitcoin’s Sustainability Problem , 2019, Joule.

[36]  Maria Gradinariu Potop-Butucaru,et al.  Impact of network delays on Hyperledger Fabric , 2019, IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[37]  D. Jenkins,et al.  Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[38]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[39]  David Rozas,et al.  When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance , 2018, SAGE Open.

[40]  Meng Cheng,et al.  Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid , 2018, Applied Energy.

[41]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[42]  Marly Monteiro de Carvalho,et al.  The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways , 2018 .

[43]  R. Merli,et al.  How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review , 2017 .

[44]  George Danezis,et al.  SoK: Consensus in the Age of Blockchains , 2017, AFT.

[45]  Ron Adner,et al.  Ecosystem as Structure , 2017 .

[46]  Mark Ruth,et al.  Transactive Home Energy Management Systems: The Impact of Their Proliferation on the Electric Grid , 2016, IEEE Electrification Magazine.

[47]  T. Hess,et al.  Digital Transformation Strategies , 2015, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[48]  Mark Deakin,et al.  Smart Cities : Governing, Modelling and Analysing the Transition , 2013 .

[49]  M. Deakin,et al.  From intelligent to smart cities , 2011 .

[50]  Philippe Durance,et al.  Scenario building: Uses and abuses , 2010 .

[51]  E. Ostrom Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems , 2010, American Economic Review.

[52]  Chaim Noy,et al.  Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[53]  A. Kenyon,et al.  Transforming Media Markets: The Cases of Malaysia and Singapore , 2007 .

[54]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  Demand Response in Electricity Markets: An Overview , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[55]  Katharine G. Abraham,et al.  Members of the Panel , 1990 .

[56]  Henri van Soest,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Trading and Energy Community in the Electricity Market - Analysing the Literature on Law and Regulation and Looking Ahead to Future Challenges , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[57]  Jaco Van der Bank,et al.  Trust, Transparency and Security in the Sharing Economy: What is the Government's Role? , 2020 .

[58]  Designing for Mod Development , 2018 .

[59]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .