Gearing up to handle the mosaic nature of life in the quest for orthologs

Abstract Summary: The Quest for Orthologs (QfO) is an open collaboration framework for experts in comparative phylogenomics and related research areas who have an interest in highly accurate orthology predictions and their applications. We here report highlights and discussion points from the QfO meeting 2015 held in Barcelona. Achievements in recent years have established a basis to support developments for improved orthology prediction and to explore new approaches. Central to the QfO effort is proper benchmarking of methods and services, as well as design of standardized datasets and standardized formats to allow sharing and comparison of results. Simultaneously, analysis pipelines have been improved, evaluated and adapted to handle large datasets. All this would not have occurred without the long-term collaboration of Consortium members. Meeting regularly to review and coordinate complementary activities from a broad spectrum of innovative researchers clearly benefits the community. Highlights of the meeting include addressing sources of and legitimacy of disagreements between orthology calls, the context dependency of orthology definitions, special challenges encountered when analyzing very anciently rooted orthologies, orthology in the light of whole-genome duplications, and the concept of orthologous versus paralogous relationships at different levels, including domain-level orthology. Furthermore, particular needs for different applications (e.g. plant genomics, ancient gene families and others) and the infrastructure for making orthology inferences available (e.g. interfaces with model organism databases) were discussed, with several ongoing efforts that are expected to be reported on during the upcoming 2017 QfO meeting.

[1]  Pelin Yilmaz,et al.  The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Alex Bateman,et al.  TreeFam v9: a new website, more species and orthology-on-the-fly , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  S. Lewis,et al.  Quest for Orthologs Entails Quest for Tree of Life: In Search of the Gene Stream , 2015, Genome biology and evolution.

[4]  E. Koonin,et al.  Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  Olivier Lespinet,et al.  FUNGIpath: a tool to assess fungal metabolic pathways predicted by orthology , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[6]  Evgeny M. Zdobnov,et al.  OrthoDB v8: update of the hierarchical catalog of orthologs and the underlying free software , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Yves Van de Peer,et al.  PLAZA 3.0: an access point for plant comparative genomics , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Fabian Schreiber,et al.  Hieranoid: hierarchical orthology inference. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Predrag Radivojac,et al.  Testing the Ortholog Conjecture with Comparative Functional Genomic Data from Mammals , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis,et al.  The Orthology Ontology: development and applications , 2016, Journal of Biomedical Semantics.

[11]  Fabian Schreiber,et al.  Letter to the Editor: SeqXML and OrthoXML: standards for sequence and orthology information , 2011, Briefings Bioinform..

[12]  E. Koonin,et al.  Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Irrational exuberance for resolved species trees , 2016, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  Edward M Marcotte,et al.  Applications of comparative evolution to human disease genetics. , 2015, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[15]  Anushya Muruganujan,et al.  PANTHER version 10: expanded protein families and functions, and analysis tools , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Klaas Vandepoele,et al.  CoExpNetViz: Comparative Co-Expression Networks Construction and Visualization Tool , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[17]  Gaston H. Gonnet,et al.  The OMA orthology database in 2015: function predictions, better plant support, synteny view and other improvements , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  J. G. Burleigh,et al.  Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Adrian M. Altenhoff,et al.  Standardized benchmarking in the quest for orthologs , 2016, Nature Methods.

[20]  Suzanna Lewis,et al.  Phylogenetic-based propagation of functional annotations within the Gene Ontology consortium , 2011, Briefings Bioinform..

[21]  K. Vandepoele,et al.  Comparative co-expression analysis in plant biology. , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[22]  Alain Denise,et al.  A meta-approach for improving the prediction and the functional annotation of ortholog groups , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[23]  Johannes Söding,et al.  MMseqs software suite for fast and deep clustering and searching of large protein sequence sets , 2016, Bioinform..

[24]  Scott Federhen,et al.  The NCBI Taxonomy database , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  B. Liebeskind What makes a sodium channel? , 2016, The Journal of general physiology.

[26]  Olivier Gascuel,et al.  TCS: a web server for multiple sequence alignment evaluation and phylogenetic reconstruction , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Davide Heller,et al.  eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  Maria Jesus Martin,et al.  Big data and other challenges in the quest for orthologs , 2014, Bioinform..