Effect of short rotation coppice plantation on the performance and chips quality of a self-propelled harvester

The performance of coppice harvesting machines is influenced by parameters such as field yield, the shape and size of the plantation and the space for turning at the headland. The quality of chips and the effect of the dendrometric characteristic of nine different species (Fraxinus angustifolia, Robinia pseudoacacia, Salix alba, Eucalyptus occidentalis, Populus nigra L. and four genotypes of Populus x euroamericana (Grimminge, Hoogvorst, Muur, Vesten) grown in the same flat plot of about 4.5 ha on the performance rate and quality of the work, was evaluated. Field yields ranged from 33 t ha−1 to ∼95 t ha−1, for the S. alba and E. occidentalis, respectively. The harvester worked with an average speed of 0.91 m s−1 (±0.22) and average productivities of 0.98 ha h−1 (±0.24) and 45.25 t h−1 (±5.56). There was a satisfactory linear correlation between the working speed of the machine and field yield. The quality of the chips showed some variability with values of moisture content ranging between 42.7% and 57.3% (for R. pseudoacacia and S. Alba respectively) and values of bulk density from 273 kg m−3 to 313 kg m−3 (for Populus euroamericana Vesten and E. occidentalis respectively).

[1]  Jacopo Bacenetti,et al.  Economic, energetic and environmental impact in short rotation coppice harvesting operations. , 2012 .

[2]  A. Faaij,et al.  International bioenergy transport costs and energy balance , 2005 .

[3]  V. Civitarese,et al.  Influence of chipping device and storage method on the quality of SRC poplar biomass. , 2013 .

[4]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Comparative study of biomass determinants of 12 poplar (Populus) genotypes in a high-density short-rotation culture , 2013 .

[5]  Gero Becker,et al.  New Holland Forage Harvester’s Productivity in Short Rotation Coppice: Evaluation of Field Studies from a German Perspective , 2012 .

[6]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economic potential of short-rotation woody crops on agricultural land for pulp fiber production in the United States. , 2000 .

[7]  K. Loague,et al.  Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application , 1991 .

[8]  Gero Becker,et al.  Harvesting of short rotation coppice - harvesting trials with a cut and storage system in Germany. , 2012 .

[9]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Woody biomass production during the second rotation of a bio‐energy Populus plantation increases in a future high CO2 world , 2006 .

[10]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Emerging Model Systems in Plant Biology: Poplar (Populus) as A Model Forest Tree , 2000, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[11]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review , 2011 .

[12]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture , 1999 .

[13]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations , 2009 .

[14]  S. Verani,et al.  Field performance of poplar for bioenergy in southern Europe after two coppicing rotations: effects of clone and planting density , 2012 .

[15]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[16]  R. Tol.  A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the EU 20/20/2020 Package , 2012 .

[17]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Importance of crown architecture for leaf area index of different Populus genotypes in a high-density plantation. , 2012, Tree physiology.

[18]  Salvatore Faugno,et al.  Development of bioenergy technologies in Uganda: A review of progress , 2013 .

[19]  S. Eriksson,et al.  The briquetting of agricultural wastes for fuel , 1990 .

[20]  J. Y. Zhu,et al.  Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: Technology and energy consumption evaluation. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[21]  Salvatore Faugno,et al.  Measurement and prediction of buffalo manure evaporation in the farmyard to improve farm management , 2013 .

[22]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Harvesting Short-Rotation Poplar Plantations for Biomass Production , 2008 .

[23]  Gianni Bellocchi,et al.  Multi-Metric Evaluation of the Models WARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for Rice , 2009 .

[24]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Effects of environment and progeny on biomass estimations of five hybrid poplar families grown at three contrasting sites across Europe , 2007 .

[25]  B. Muys,et al.  Carbon sequestration following afforestation of agricultural soils: comparing oak/beech forest to short‐rotation poplar coppice combining a process and a carbon accounting model , 2004 .

[26]  Wilhelm Claupein,et al.  Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use - a review of the physiological basis and management influences. , 2003 .

[27]  D. Klass.  Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels, and Chemicals , 1998 .

[28]  L. Mareschi.  Le nuove varieta di pioppo da biomassa garantiscono produttivita interessanti , 2005 .

[29]  Matti Parikka,et al.  Global biomass fuel resources , 2004 .

[30]  V. Civitarese,et al.  Characterization of Woodchips for Energy from Forestry and Agroforestry Production , 2012 .