Justifying the methods of OR

Operational research practitioners use mathematical, statistical, scientific, and other methods to structure and analyse issues in order to advise and assist their clients. In doing so they apply values, follow rules and use methodologies. The paper examines the justification of these methods, values and methodologies. Starting with a conceptual model drawn from the philosophy of science, a justification framework is developed for operational research (OR). Making a distinction between OR academic research and OR practice helps to clarify the issues. OR research is similar to scientific, mathematical and social science research; OR practice, as technology, is closer to engineering. While OR academic researchers will seek justification in the academic discipline within which they choose to work, it is argued that the justification of OR practice lies in its usefulness. For academic OR, justification lies in the justification of mathematics, statistics, science and social science; for practice, it is practitioners who decide what usefulness means in their context.

[1]  Richard J. Ormerod.  New Methods for Old , 1996 .

[2]  Hasok Chang,et al.  Theories of Scientific Method , 2003 .

[3]  Hugh J. Miser,et al.  Comments Prompted by ‘On the Nature of OR—Entering the Fray’ , 1996 .

[4]  J. Hughes,et al.  The philosophy of social research , 1981 .

[5]  Classical Social Theory , 2003 .

[6]  N. Rescher.  A system of pragmatic idealism , 1992 .

[7]  Shih-Wei Lin,et al.  A hybrid approach for single-machine tardiness problems with sequence-dependent setup times , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Rational inference: deductive, inductive and probabilistic thinking , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  W. Quine.  Ontological Relativity and Other Essays , 1969 .

[10]  Maurice Kirby,et al.  Operational research in war and peace , 2003 .

[11]  C. Judd,et al.  Pragmatism. A new name for some old ways of thinking. , 1908 .

[12]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  On the nature of OR: taking stock , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  W. Quine.  The two dogmas of empiricism , 1951 .

[14]  C. Peirce.  How to Make Our Ideas Clear , 2011, The Nature of Truth.

[15]  Willard Van Orman Quine.  Theories and Things , 1981 .

[16]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Beyond positivism and relativism : theory, method and evidence , 1997 .

[17]  Richard Ormerod,et al.  The history and ideas of pragmatism , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[19]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  On the Nature of OR — Entering the Fray , 1996 .

[20]  RJ Ormerod,et al.  The history and ideas of critical rationalism: the philosophy of Karl Popper and its implications for OR , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  C.J.H. Mann,et al.  Systems approaches to management , 2002 .

[22]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Articulate intervention revisited , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  Heiner Müller-Merbach,et al.  Articulate intervention — the interface of science, mathematics and administration: Hylton BOOTHROYD Taylor and Francis, London, 1978, xiv + 154 pages, £ 6.00 , 1979 .

[24]  Eric T. Bell,et al.  The Philosophy of Mathematics , 1950 .

[25]  Lefteris Farmakis.  Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edition , 2004 .

[26]  H. Spiegel.  The growth of economic thought , 1971 .

[27]  T. Honderich.  The Oxford Companion to Philosophy , 1995 .

[28]  P. Keys,et al.  OR as Technology: Some Issues and Implications , 1989 .

[29]  John Mingers,et al.  Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy , 1983 .

[30]  W. Quine.  Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism. , 1951 .

[31]  L. Menand,et al.  Pragmatism: A Reader , 1997 .

[32]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Philosophy for professionals: towards critical pragmatism , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[33]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  The Pursuit of Truth , 1990 .

[34]  M. Kirby,et al.  Operational Research in War and Peace : The British Experience from the 1930s to 1970 , 2003 .

[35]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[36]  Alison Wolf,et al.  Contemporary sociological theory , 1980 .

[37]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Response to Miser: The Objects and Objectives of Operational Research , 1996 .

[38]  Paul Keys.  A Technologist's Response to Miser , 1991 .

[39]  L. Laudan,et al.  Scientific change: Philosophical models and historical research , 1986, Synthese.

[40]  I. Craib.  Classical Social Theory , 1997 .

[41]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate , 1984 .

[42]  Hugh J. Miser.  Comments on ‘OR as Technology’ , 1991 .

[43]  Walter Wright.  Nicholas Rescher , A System of Pragmatic Idealism Volume I: Human Knowledge in Idealistic Perspective . Reviewed by , 1992 .

[44]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Encyclopedia of sociology , 2000 .

[45]  Abner Shimony,et al.  Search For A Naturalistic World View , 1993 .

[46]  Hartry Field,et al.  Science without Numbers , 1983 .