The degree of extra-pair paternity increases with genetic variability.

The amount of extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous bird species varies from 0% to 76% extra-pair offspring. The causes of this remarkable interspecific variation are largely unknown, although intraspecific analyses suggest that females seek extra-pair matings to improve the genetic quality of their offspring. If this is a general explanation for the occurrence of extra-pair matings, then proportionally more females should seek to modify the paternity of their clutch when there is more variation among males in their genetic quality. Here we test this prediction in birds and show that interspecific variation in the proportion of extra-pair offspring is positively related to the proportion of polymorphic loci as measured by protein electrophoresis, even when controlling for potentially confounding variables. Genetic variability was also assessed, for sister pairs of species and populations differing significantly in extra-pair paternity, by using random priming, which provides an estimate of genome-wide diversity. We found that genetic diversity was higher in the populations with a higher level of extra-pair paternity. These results suggest that the amount of genetic variability in a population may be an important factor influencing mating patterns.

[1]  R. O'HARA,et al.  Essay-review of Sibley and Ahlquist's 'Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution' , 1991 .

[2]  A. Møller,et al.  Copulation Behaviour of Birds , 1987 .

[3]  Jon E. Ahlquist,et al.  Phylogeny and Classification of the Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution , 1991 .

[4]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[5]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Extra-pair paternity in birds: `good-genes' and something else: Reply from M. Petrie and B. Kempenaers. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  T. Brough,et al.  Average weights of birds , 1983 .

[7]  J. Graves.  Sperm competition in birds. Evolutionary causes and consequences By T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller. London: Academic Press (1992). Pp. x + 282. Price £19.50 paperback , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila , 1992, Nature.

[9]  Derek A Roff,et al.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components , 1987, Heredity.

[10]  D. Westneat.  Polygyny and extrapair fertilizations in eastern red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) , 1993 .

[11]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[12]  D. Ristow,et al.  Mate fidelity and parentage in Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea ‐ field studies and DNA fingerprinting , 1994 .

[13]  I. Olivieri,et al.  Genetic markers and quantitative genetic variation in Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae): a comparative analysis of population structure. , 1996, Genetics.

[14]  R. Chakraborty.  The distribution of the number of heterozygous Loci in an individual in natural populations. , 1981, Genetics.

[15]  J. Lifjeld,et al.  High frequency of extra-pair paternity in a dense and synchronous population of Willow Warblers Phylloscopus trochilus , 1997 .

[16]  E. M. Gray.  Female control of offspring paternity in a western population of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  D. Penny.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1992 .

[18]  P. Stockley.  Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection , 1999, Heredity.

[19]  Sperm competition and sexual selection , 1998 .

[20]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Artifactual variation in randomly amplified polymorphic DNA banding patterns. , 1993, BioTechniques.

[21]  I. R. Hartley,et al.  Nesting Henderson Reed-Warblers (Acrocephalus vaughani taiti) studied by DNA fingerprinting : unrelated coalitions in a stable habitat ? , 1995 .

[22]  J. Ahlquist.  Phylogeny and classification of birds , 1985 .

[23]  Jerram L. Brown.  A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity , 1997 .

[24]  U. Gyllensten,et al.  No evidence for illegitimate young in monogamous and polygynous warblers , 1990, Nature.

[25]  T. Amundsen,et al.  Paternity and paternity assurance behaviour in the bluethroat, Luscinias.svecica , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work – sometimes , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  A. Moller,et al.  A Pairwise Comparative Method as Illustrated by Copulation Frequency in Birds , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[28]  P. David,et al.  Context-dependent survival differences among electrophoretic genotypes in natural populations of the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis. , 1997, Genetics.

[29]  Michael Shepherd,et al.  Reproductive success of polygynous male corn buntings (Miliaria calandra) as confirmed by DNA fingerprinting , 1993 .

[30]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit , 1992, Nature.

[31]  D. Hartl,et al.  Principles of population genetics , 1981 .

[32]  D. Westneat.  Extra-pair copulations in a predominantly monogamous bird: observations of behaviour , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Dennis Hasselquist,et al.  Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler , 1996, Nature.

[34]  L. Eguiarte.  Principles of population genetics: by D. L. Hard and A. G. Clark, Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, MA, 1997. $58.95 (casebound), xiii + 542 pp. ISBN 0-87893-306-9 , 1998 .

[35]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  P. Sherman,et al.  Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  B. Stutchbury,et al.  The Effect of Breeding Synchrony On Extra-Pair Mating Systems in Songbirds , 1995 .

[38]  T. Burke,et al.  Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting , 1994, Nature.

[39]  C. G. Sibley.  On the phylogeny and classification of living birds , 1994 .

[40]  D. Westneat,et al.  Mate Guarding and Extra-Pair Paternity in Northern Cardinals , 1994 .

[41]  A. Read.  Passerine Polygyny: A Role for Parasites? , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[42]  T. Birkhead.  Sperm competition in birds. , 1998, Reviews of reproduction.

[43]  J. Mitton.  Enzyme heterozygosity and developmental stability , 1995 .

[44]  T. Burke,et al.  Frequent copulation as a method of paternity assurance in the northern fulmar , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  J. Mitton.  Selection in Natural Populations , 1997 .

[46]  M. Lynch,et al.  Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers , 1994, Molecular ecology.

[47]  J. Austin,et al.  Low frequency of extra‐pair paternity in two colonies of the socially monogamous short‐tailed shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris , 1996 .

[48]  J. Mitton,et al.  The distribution of individual heterozygosity in natural populations. , 1980, Genetics.

[49]  A. Møller.  Immune defence, extra–pair paternity, and sexual selection in birds , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Avian polygyny is most likely in populations with high variability in heritable male fitness , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.