Comparative analysis of full-time, half-time, and quarter-time myocardial ECG-gated SPECT quantification in normal-weight and overweight patients

BackgroundThe introduction of a camera-based dose-reduction strategy in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) clinical setting entails the definition of objective and reproducible criteria for establishing the amount of activity to be injected.AimThe aim is to evaluate the impact of count statistics on the estimation of summed-scores (SS), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF).MethodsData rest/stress ECG-gated SPECT (2-day protocol and 8 MBq·kg−1) were acquired with Bright View gamma camera and Astonish algorithm for 40 normal-weight and 40 overweight patients. Assuming that count statistics of shorter acquisition time may simulate that of lower injected activity, three simultaneous scans (full-time, half-time, and quarter-time scans) were started at the same time but with different acquisition time/projection (30, 15 and 8 seconds).ResultsA significant difference between SS values of half-time and quarter-time stress scans was found for overweight group (P = .006). Post hoc test showed significant differences for ESV (P < .05), EDV (P < .01) and EF (P < .05) between half-time and quarter-time scans for both patient groups.ConclusionsThe reduction of the count-statistics to a quarter of the MPI reference influenced negatively the quantification in overweight patients. The decrease of radiopharmaceutical activity to 25% of the reference seems practicable for normal-weight patients, while it is more appropriate an activity reduction limited to 50% for overweight and obese patients.

[1]  C. Marcassa,et al.  Temporal evolution of administered activity in cardiac gated SPECT and patients’ effective dose: analysis of an historical series , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals , 1991 .

[3]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Automatic and visual reproducibility of perfusion and function measures for myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[4]  L. Indovina,et al.  Comparative analysis of cadmium-zincum-telluride cameras dedicated to myocardial perfusion SPECT: A phantom study , 2016, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[5]  P. Marino,et al.  The Relationship Between Quantitative Perfusion and Functional Results and Acquisition Time With Reduced Administered Activity for 99mTc Tetrofosmin Myocardial Gated-SPECT , 2012, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[6]  R. Blankstein,et al.  Approaches to Reducing Radiation Dose from Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Silvana Garancini,et al.  Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  Shortened acquisition time or reduced-activity dose for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with new reconstruction algorithm , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[9]  Guido Germano,et al.  Quantitative high-efficiency cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT with dedicated parallel-hole collimation system in obese patients: Results of a multi-center study , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  M. Horie,et al.  Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in Japanese population. , 2008, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[11]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  SNMMI/ASNC/SCCT Guideline for Cardiac SPECT/CT and PET/CT 1.0* , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Advances in Nuclear Cardiac Instrumentation with a View Towards Reduced Radiation Exposure , 2012, Current Cardiology Reports.

[13]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  New reconstruction algorithm allows shortened acquisition time for myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  O. Henriksen,et al.  Effects of acquisition time and reconstruction algorithm on image quality, quantitative parameters, and clinical interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  O. Zoccarato Innovative reconstruction algorithms in cardiac SPECT scintigraphy. , 2012, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[16]  D. Berman,et al.  Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: what is the warranty period of a normal scan? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  O. Morel,et al.  Stress-first protocol for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with semiconductor cameras: high diagnostic performances with significant reduction in patient radiation doses , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Matthew D Aldridge,et al.  Clinical evaluation of reducing acquisition time on single-photon emission computed tomography image quality using proprietary resolution recovery software , 2013, Nuclear medicine communications.

[19]  Edward P. Ficaro,et al.  Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[20]  D. Berman,et al.  Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with a Solid-State Camera: Simulation of a Very Low Dose Imaging Protocol , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  F. Bengel,et al.  IQ SPECT Allows a Significant Reduction in Administered Dose and Acquisition Time for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Evidence from a Phantom Study , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  E. Depuey,et al.  Wide beam reconstruction “quarter-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to “full-time” ordered subset expectation maximum , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[23]  J. D. Harrison,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals , 1988 .

[24]  F. Hage,et al.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2014: Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[25]  L. K. Harding,et al.  Relationship between myocardial counts and patient weight: adjusting the injected activity in myocardial perfusion scans , 2003, Nuclear medicine communications.

[26]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[27]  S. Underwood,et al.  The relationship between administered radiopharmaceutical activity in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and imaging outcome , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  B. Hesse,et al.  Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC) , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  J. Valentin,et al.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals , 1998 .