Core based tree multicast (M-CBT) approach in supporting mobility

IP multicasting provides a mechanism for faster handoff support than Mobile IP [9] [16]. Coupled with its location independent addressing, multicasting is a viable alternative to support mobility in the Internet. This paper continues research into using IP multicasting in mobility. Our proposed scheme looks at enabling a mobile node to initiate two way communications with a corresponding node on a shared multicast tree. We use as much of the existing Internet architecture as possible by making the basestation a member of the multicast group. The mobile is not directly connected to the tree but goes through the basestation to send and receive packets. This paper explains the differences and advantages of our proposed scheme compared with other multicast based mobility schemes and Mobile IP.

[1]  David Thaler,et al.  Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses , 2002, RFC.

[2]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  A multicast-based protocol for IP mobility support , 2000, Networked Group Communication.

[3]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  A hierarchical mobility management scheme for IPv6 , 1998, Proceedings Third IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. ISCC'98. (Cat. No.98EX166).

[4]  Abdol Hamid Aghvami,et al.  Sparse mode multicast as a mobility solution for internet campus networks , 1999 .

[5]  David Meyer,et al.  GLOP Addressing in 233/8 , 2001, RFC.

[6]  Matt Crawford,et al.  Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks , 1998, RFC.

[7]  Tony Ballardie,et al.  Core Based Trees (CBT) Multicast Routing Architecture , 1997, RFC.

[8]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Handoffs in Cellular Wireless Networks: The Daedalus Implementation and Experience , 1997, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[9]  Tony Ballardie,et al.  Core Based Trees (CBT version 2) Multicast Routing - Protocol Specification - , 1997, RFC.

[10]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  A new multicasting-based architecture for Internet host mobility , 1997, MobiCom '97.

[11]  Pyda Srisuresh,et al.  Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT) , 2001, RFC.

[12]  J. Bibb Cain,et al.  Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols , 1997, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[13]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Efficient micro-mobility using intra-domain multicast-based mechanisms (M&M) , 2002, CCRV.