Evaluating Supplier Performance Using DEA and Piecewise Triangular Fuzzy AHP

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been widely applied in evaluating multicriteria decision making problems, which have multi-input and multi-output. However, the traditional DEA method does neither take the decision maker’s subjective preferences to the individual criteria into consideration nor rank the selected options or decision making units (DMUs). On the other hand, Satty’s analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was established to rank options or DMUs under multi-input and multi-output through pairwise comparisons. However, in most cases, the AHP pairwise comparison method is not perfectly consistent, which may give rise to confusions in determining the appropriate priorities of each criterion to be considered. The inconsistency implicates the fuzziness in generating the relative important weight for each criterion. In this paper, a novel method, which employs both DEA and AHP methods, is proposed to evaluate the overall performance of suppliers’ involvement in the production of a manufacturing company. This method has been developed through modifying the DEA method into a weighting constrained DEA method by using a piecewise triangular weighting fuzzy set, which is generated from the inconsistent AHP comparisons. A bias tolerance ratio (BTR) is introduced to represent the varying but restrained weighting values of each criterion. Accordingly, the BTR provides the decision maker a controllable parameter by tightening or loosening the range of the weighting values in evaluating the overall performance of available suppliers, which in hence, overcomes the two weaknesses of the traditional DEA method.

[1]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA , 1992 .

[2]  Yongji Wang,et al.  Evaluation of Project Quality: A DEA-Based Approach , 2006, SPW/ProSim.

[3]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons , 1989 .

[4]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[5]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[6]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[8]  Mette Asmild,et al.  Measuring overall efficiency and effectiveness using DEA , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Chun-Ling Chuang,et al.  SUPPLIER SELECTION AND PLANNING MODEL USING AHP , 2005 .

[10]  Zhang Tao An Application of a Preference Restraint Cone DEA Model in Vendor Selection , 2003 .

[11]  H. Ishii,et al.  Fuzzy AHP with incomplete information , 2001, Proceedings Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference (Cat. No. 01TH8569).

[12]  Wu,et al.  A DEA Model with an AHP Restraint Cone , 1999 .

[13]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification , 2000 .

[14]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Interval Evaluations in the Analytic Hierarchy Process By Possibility Analysis , 2001, Comput. Intell..

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[16]  S. Zionts,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1968 .

[17]  Bhallamudi Ravi,et al.  Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units , 2000 .

[19]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Fuzzy Ranking for Concept Evaluation in Configuration Design for Mass Customization , 1998 .

[20]  P. Harker,et al.  Globally effective questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .