Exploring social network analysis techniques on decision support

Managers are increasingly concerned in making timely and correct decisions, using adaptable decision structures, processes and mechanisms. For this purpose, they resort to web discourse capture and analysis to obtain opinions that express different points of view, regarding organizational decision-making. Since communication and interaction among groups are very important in group decision, the exchanged and shared contents, as well as a social network analysis (SNA), can play an important role in this process. Understanding the interactions within a social network and how they can support decision-making is an important issue, representing the main motivation for this work. For the study presented in this paper, to understand how organizations can strategically use online communication as a decision support tool, we chose to use Facebook, where social actors gather around the same focus of interest or affinity (friends, co-workers, etc.) and, additionally, it is possible to create discussion groups for defining a problem, limit group members and context argument. In addition, we chose an ego-centric analysis focused on a single actor, instead of the network as a whole, to get a good picture of the “local” or his “neighbors” networks. The analyzed data were collected from Facebook and afterwards we applied SNA techniques in order to draw some conclusions.

[1]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[2]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations , 2010 .

[3]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  From Social Network (Centralized vs. Decentralized) to Collective Decision-Making (Unshared vs. Shared Consensus) , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Marleen Huysman,et al.  Extending Social Network Analysis with Discourse Analysis: Combining Relational with Interpretive Data , 2013, The Influence of Technology on Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[5]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  What is special about social network analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Patrizia Grifoni,et al.  An Overview of Methods for Virtual Social Networks Analysis , 2010, Computational Social Network Analysis.

[7]  P. C. Nutt,et al.  Handbook on Decision Making , 2010, Intelligent Systems Reference Library.

[8]  João Paulo Costa,et al.  Integrating Decision Support and Social Networks , 2012, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  R. Hanneman,et al.  INTRODUCTION TO THE FORMAL ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL NETWORKS USING MATHEMATICA , 2006 .

[10]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm , 2009 .

[11]  Peter Mika,et al.  Social Networks and the Semantic Web , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04).

[12]  Abha Moitra,et al.  Ego-Centric Network Sampling in Viral Marketing Applications , 2010, Mining and Analyzing Social Networks.

[13]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[14]  Roberto Marmo Web Mining and Social Network Analysis , 2011 .

[15]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[16]  Olivier Corby,et al.  Semantic Social Network Analysis: A Concrete Case , 2011 .

[17]  T. Das,et al.  Cognitive Biases and Strategic Decision Processes: An Integrative Perspective , 1999 .

[18]  Frédéric Adam Using Network Analysis for Understanding How Decisions are Made , 2008 .

[19]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent , 2012 .

[20]  George P. Huber,et al.  The nature of organizational decision making and the desig n of decision support systems , 1981 .