Models of Models: A Translational Route for Cancer Treatment and Drug Development

Every patient and every disease is different. Each patient therefore requires a personalized treatment approach. For technical reasons, a personalized approach is feasible for treatment strategies such as surgery, but not for drug-based therapy or drug development. The development of individual mechanistic models of the disease process in every patient offers the possibility of attaining truly personalized drug-based therapy and prevention. The concept of virtual clinical trials and the integrated use of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo models in preclinical development could lead to significant gains in efficiency and order of magnitude increases in the cost effectiveness of drug development and approval. We have developed mechanistic computational models of large-scale cellular signal transduction networks for prediction of drug effects and functional responses, based on patient-specific multi-level omics profiles. However, a major barrier to the use of such models in a clinical and developmental context is the reliability of predictions. Here we detail how the approach of using “models of models” has the potential to impact cancer treatment and drug development. We describe the iterative refinement process that leverages the flexibility of experimental systems to generate highly dimensional data, which can be used to train and validate computational model parameters and improve model predictions. In this way, highly optimized computational models with robust predictive capacity can be generated. Such models open up a number of opportunities for cancer drug treatment and development, from enhancing the design of experimental studies, reducing costs, and improving animal welfare, to increasing the translational value of results generated.

[1]  L. Jonung,et al.  DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS , 1725 .

[2]  S. Ganesan,et al.  Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Potential Utility in Personalized Medicine , 2017, Front. Oncol..

[3]  Miguel Rocha,et al.  Data-driven reverse engineering of signaling pathways using ensembles of dynamic models , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[5]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Scalable Parameter Estimation for Genome-Scale Biochemical Reaction Networks , 2016, bioRxiv.

[7]  Jesper Tegnér,et al.  Optimization in Biology Parameter Estimation and the Associated Optimization Problem , 2016 .

[8]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  A model reduction method for biochemical reaction networks , 2014, BMC Systems Biology.

[10]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[11]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Association Rate Constants of Ras-Effector Interactions Are Evolutionarily Conserved , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[13]  寛 大岩 早期関節リウマチ:brief overview , 2018 .

[14]  Mindy I. Davis,et al.  A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Andriani Daskalaki,et al.  High-Throughput miRNA and mRNA Sequencing of Paired Colorectal Normal, Tumor and Metastasis Tissues and Bioinformatic Modeling of miRNA-1 Therapeutic Applications , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Axel Kowald,et al.  Systems Biology - a Textbook , 2016 .

[17]  Maksat Ashyraliyev,et al.  Systems biology: parameter estimation for biochemical models , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[18]  Catherine L. Worth,et al.  Molecular dissection of colorectal cancer in pre-clinical models identifies biomarkers predicting sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors , 2017, Nature Communications.

[19]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[20]  Corbin E. Meacham,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity , 2013, Nature.

[21]  Eva Balsa-Canto,et al.  Parameter estimation and optimal experimental design. , 2008, Essays in biochemistry.

[22]  Elhanan Borenstein,et al.  Conservation of trans-acting circuitry during mammalian regulatory evolution , 2014, Nature.

[23]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Cancer heterogeneity: implications for targeted therapeutics , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  O. Stegle,et al.  Deep learning for computational biology , 2016, Molecular systems biology.

[25]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  Journal of Health Economics , 2016 .

[26]  M. Gerlinger,et al.  How Darwinian models inform therapeutic failure initiated by clonal heterogeneity in cancer medicine , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  Janet Sultana,et al.  Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions , 2013, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[28]  N. McGranahan,et al.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution , 2013, Nature.

[29]  M. Ghert,et al.  Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. , 2014, American journal of translational research.

[30]  G. Collins The next generation. , 2006, Scientific American.

[31]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Reverse engineering and identification in systems biology: strategies, perspectives and challenges , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[32]  Hans Lehrach,et al.  Network and systems biology: essential steps in virtualising drug discovery and development. , 2015, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[33]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[34]  Andriani Daskalaki,et al.  Prediction in the face of uncertainty: a Monte Carlo-based approach for systems biology of cancer treatment. , 2012, Mutation research.

[35]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery. A comprehensive review , 2012, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[36]  J. Jonkers,et al.  Using genetically engineered mouse models to validate candidate cancer genes and test new therapeutic approaches. , 2012, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[37]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Comparative Analysis Reveals Conserved Protein Phosphorylation Networks Implicated in Multiple Diseases , 2009, Science Signaling.

[38]  Ralf J. Sommer,et al.  The evolution of signalling pathways in animal development , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Parameter estimation in large-scale systems biology models: a parallel and self-adaptive cooperative strategy , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[40]  Ulrich Keilholz,et al.  Personalized medicine approaches for colon cancer driven by genomics and systems biology: OncoTrack , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[41]  Z. Weng,et al.  Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human , 2014, Nature.

[42]  Jos Jonkers,et al.  Genetically engineered mouse models in oncology research and cancer medicine , 2016, EMBO molecular medicine.

[43]  N. Schork Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials , 2015, Nature.

[44]  H. Lehrach,et al.  Resources, standards and tools for systems biology. , 2007, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[45]  Chi-Ping Day,et al.  Preclinical Mouse Cancer Models: A Maze of Opportunities and Challenges , 2015, Cell.