Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study

Abstract Objective : To measure the change in cardiovascular risk factors achievable in families over one year by a cardiovascular screening and lifestyle intervention in general practice. Design : Randomised controlled trial in 26 general practices in 13 towns in Britain. Subjects : 12472 men aged 40-59 and their partners (7460 men and 5012 women) identified by household. Intervention : Nurse led programme using a family centred approach with follow up according to degree of risk. Main outcome measures : After one year the pairs of practices were compared for differences in (a) total coronary (Dundee) risk score and (b) cigarette smoking, weight, blood pressure, and random blood cholesterol and glucose concentrations. Results : In men the overall reduction in coronary risk score was 16% (95% confidence interval 11% to 21%) in the intervention practices at one year. This was partitioned between systolic pressure (7%), smoking (5%), and cholesterol concentration (4%). The reduction for women was similar. For both sexes reported cigarette smoking at one year was lower by about 4%, systolic pressure by 7 mm Hg, diastolic pressure by 3 mm Hg, weight by 1 kg, and cholesterol concentration by 0.1 mmol/l, but there was no shift in glucose concentration. Weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol concentration showed the greatest difference at the top of the distribution. If maintained long term the differences in risk factors achieved would mean only a 12% reduction in risk of coronary events. Conclusions : As most general practices are not using such an intensive programme the changes in coronary risk factors achieved by the voluntary health promotion package for primary care are likely to be even smaller. The government's screening policy cannot be justified by these results.

[1]  D. Wood,et al.  Using a Coronary Risk Score for Screening and Intervention in General Practice , 1996, Journal of cardiovascular risk.

[2]  G. Gustavsson,et al.  Targeting heavy smokers in general practice: randomised controlled trial of transdermal nicotine patches. , 1993, BMJ.

[3]  D. Mant,et al.  Effectiveness of a nicotine patch in helping people stop smoking: results of a randomised trial in general practice. Imperial Cancer Research Fund General Practice Research Group. , 1993, BMJ.

[4]  H Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  The Dundee coronary risk-disk for management of change in risk factors. , 1991, BMJ.

[5]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context , 1990, The Lancet.

[6]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias , 1990, The Lancet.

[7]  D. Mant,et al.  Three year follow up of patients with raised blood pressure identified at health checks in general practice. , 1989, BMJ.

[8]  R. Pill,et al.  Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders. , 1988, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  C. Reading,et al.  Continuous opportunistic and systematic screening for hypertension with computer help: analysis of non-responders. , 1987, British medical journal.

[10]  S J Pocock,et al.  A scoring system to identify men at high risk of a heart attack. , 1987, Health trends.

[11]  G. Fowler,et al.  Promoting prevention in primary care: controlled trial of low technology, low cost approach. , 1987, British medical journal.

[12]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[13]  R. Richmond,et al.  Three year evaluation of a programme by general practitioners to help patients to stop smoking. , 1986, British medical journal.

[14]  J. Harries,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of routine hospital clinic care versus routine general practice care for type II diabetics. , 1984, British medical journal.

[15]  N. Wald,et al.  Controlled trial of three different antismoking interventions in general practice. , 1984, British medical journal.

[16]  A. Haines,et al.  Detection and management of hypertension in general practices in north west London. , 1984, British medical journal.

[17]  L. Ritchie,et al.  Blood pressure recording by general practitioners in north-east Scotland. , 1983, British medical journal.

[18]  S J Pocock,et al.  British Regional Heart Study: cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged men in 24 towns. , 1981, British medical journal.

[19]  British family heart study: its design and method, and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. , 1994, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[20]  A. Coulter,et al.  Prevalence of risk factors for heart disease in OXCHECK trial: Implications for screening in primary care , 1991 .

[21]  A. Donner,et al.  Analysis of data arising from a stratified design with the cluster as unit of randomization. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  J. Lee,et al.  Husband-wife correspondence in smoking, drinking, and dietary habits. , 1981, The American journal of clinical nutrition.