Distribution nucleation: Quantifying liquid distribution on the particle surface using the dimensionless particle coating number

Abstract Control of nucleation in wet granulation often determines the size and structure of the final granules. After a decade of research, our knowledge of “immersion nucleation”, where a large droplet engulfs fine particles, is relatively well established. However, far less is known about the second mechanism called “distribution nucleation”, where the powder particles are gradually coated by a layer of small droplets. In this paper, the similarities between particle coating and granulation were used to define the five steps of distribution nucleation. A Bernoulli model was developed to describe the fractional surface coating F , and a new dimensionless parameter, the particle coating number Φ p , was defined as the ratio of the theoretical area coated by the drops, assuming no overlap, to the total surface area of the particle. The particle coating number was experimentally validated by adding drops randomly over the surface of a particle and measuring the fractional surface coating using image analysis. Standard ping pong balls (40 mm diameter) plus four sizes of foam balls ranging from 20 to 50 mm diameter were coated with either small or large drops of melted PEG1000. The results demonstrated that the particle coating number Φ p can be used to predict the fractional surface coverage F using simple, known parameters (without any fitting coefficients), and was able to account for differences in particle size and drop size. Deviations in the experimental data from the theoretical predictions were observed, and attributed to drop spreading and merging and heat conduction into the particle, which all affect the experimental drop footprint area. When the effective footprint area was used as a fitting parameter all the experimental data collapsed onto a single line, demonstrating that the particle coating number captures the key coating coverage behaviour. The particle coating number can also be used to predict the effect of changing particle size, surface area, liquid level, or drop size on the coating fraction, which is in turn known to be linked to granulation kinetics. The particle coating number opens up new options for granulation process control, and is expected to be valuable in a variety of particle wetting and coating applications where small drops are distributed over larger particles.

[1]  Gavin K. Reynolds,et al.  Simulating the early stage of high-shear granulation using a two-dimensional Monte-Carlo approach , 2009 .

[2]  J. Litster,et al.  A novel nucleation apparatus for regime separated granulation , 2007 .

[3]  T Schaefer,et al.  Effects of interactions between powder particle size and binder viscosity on agglomerate growth mechanisms in a high shear mixer. , 2001, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[4]  James D. Litster,et al.  Coalescence of deformable granules in wet granulation processes , 2000 .

[5]  James D. Litster,et al.  Nucleation regime map for liquid bound granules , 2003 .

[6]  M. Hounslow,et al.  Single drop behaviour in a high shear granulator , 2009 .

[7]  A. Rasmuson,et al.  Characterization and mathematical modelling of single fluidised particle coating , 2011 .

[8]  A. Clarke,et al.  Spreading and Imbibition of Liquid Droplets on Porous Surfaces , 2002 .

[9]  A. Nienow FLUIDISED BED GRANULATION AND COATING: APPLICATIONS TO MATERIALS, AGRICULTURE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY , 1995 .

[10]  Bryan J. Ennis,et al.  The influence of viscosity on the strength of an axially strained pendular liquid bridge , 1990 .

[11]  J. Litster,et al.  Drop penetration into porous powder beds. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[12]  Edward T. White,et al.  Dimensionless spray flux in wet granulation: Monte-Carlo simulations and experimental validation , 2004 .

[13]  F. Štěpánek,et al.  Experimental study of wet granulation in fluidized bed: impact of the binder properties on the granule morphology. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[14]  Denis Poncelet,et al.  Batch and continuous fluid bed coating – review and state of the art , 2002 .

[15]  P. Vonk,et al.  Fluid bed agglomeration with a narrow droplet size distribution. , 2000, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[16]  Carl Wassgren,et al.  Intra-particle coating variability: Analysis and Monte-Carlo simulations , 2010 .

[17]  Ian T. Cameron,et al.  Modelling nucleation in wet granulation , 2005 .

[18]  Richard Turton,et al.  The scale-up of spray coating processes for granular solids and tablets , 2005 .

[19]  Wei Shen,et al.  Drop penetration time in heterogeneous powder beds , 2009 .

[20]  Frantisek Stepánek,et al.  Droplet morphologies on particles with macroscopic surface roughness. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[21]  Karen Hapgood,et al.  Improving liquid distribution by reducing dimensionless spray flux in wet granulation—A pharmaceutical manufacturing case study , 2010 .

[22]  M. Cavinato,et al.  Combining formulation and process aspects for optimizing the high-shear wet granulation of common drugs. , 2011, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[23]  Russell V. Plank,et al.  Quantifying liquid coverage and powder flux in high-shear granulators , 2003 .

[24]  Torben Schaefer,et al.  Effects of droplet size and type of binder on the agglomerate growth mechanisms by melt agglomeration in a fluidised bed. , 2002, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[25]  Anker Degn Jensen,et al.  Validation of the flux number as scaling parameter for top-spray fluidised bed systems , 2008 .

[26]  Michael J. Hounslow,et al.  Influence of liquid binder dispersion on agglomeration in an intensive mixer , 2008 .

[27]  Carl Wassgren,et al.  Intra-tablet coating variability for several pharmaceutical tablet shapes , 2011 .

[28]  H. Martin,et al.  Modeling the droplet deposition behavior on a single particle in fluidized bed spray granulation process , 2001 .

[29]  James D. Litster,et al.  Scale-up of mixer granulators for effective liquid distribution , 2002 .

[30]  S. Iveson,et al.  The impact of liquid drops on powder bed surfaces , 1999 .

[31]  B. J. Ennis,et al.  Nucleation, growth and breakage phenomena in agitated wet granulation processes: a review , 2001 .

[32]  T. Schaefer,et al.  The effect of droplet size and powder particle size on the mechanisms of nucleation and growth in fluid bed melt agglomeration. , 2002, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[33]  Kersten Christoph Link,et al.  Fluidized bed spray granulation: Investigation of the coating process on a single sphere , 1997 .

[34]  B. Waldie,et al.  Growth mechanism and the dependence of granule size on drop size in fluidized-bed granulation , 1991 .

[35]  Wei Shen,et al.  Rewetting effects and droplet motion on partially wetted powder surfaces , 2009 .

[36]  P. Sojka,et al.  Drop impact and agglomeration under static powder bed conditions , 2012 .

[37]  Alex C. Hoffmann,et al.  Effects and control of humidity and particle mixing in fluid-bed granulation , 1999 .

[38]  B. J. Ennis,et al.  A microlevel-based characterization of granulation phenomena , 1991 .

[39]  Michael J. Hounslow,et al.  Studies of fluid bed granulation in an industrial R&D context , 2005 .

[40]  Mehrdji Hemati,et al.  Fluidized bed coating and granulation: influence of process-related variables and physicochemical properties on the growth kinetics , 2003 .

[41]  K. Hapgood,et al.  Foam and drop penetration kinetics into loosely packed powder beds , 2009 .

[42]  R. Boerefijn,et al.  A narrow size distribution on a high shear mixer by applying a flux number approach , 2009 .

[43]  J. Litster,et al.  Liquid distribution in wet granulation: dimensionless spray flux , 2001 .

[44]  W. K. Ng,et al.  Experimental study of liquid drop impact onto a powder surface , 2010 .

[45]  Rohit Ramachandran,et al.  Distribution and accessibility of binder in wet granules , 2009 .