Chemical Amplification (or Dampening) of the Twomey Effect: Conditions Derived from Droplet Activation Theory

Cloud droplet number concentrations are controlled by both meteorological and microphysical factors. Microphysical factors include aerosol number concentration and composition. This paper examines the importance of microphysical phenomena compared to the sensitivity with respect to parcel updraft velocity in the activation of aerosols to become cloud droplets. Of the compositional (chemical) factors that can influence droplet number concentration, the effect of organics is examined through their ability to alter droplet surface tension and to contribute solute. A recent parameterization of aerosol activation (by Abdul-Razzak et al.) is extended to obtain analytical expressions for the sensitivity of activation to microphysical factors relative to updraft velocity. It is demonstrated that, under some conditions, the droplet number concentration can be as much as 1.5 times more sensitive to changes in aerosol composition than to updraft velocity. Chemical effects seem to be most influential for size distributions typical of marine conditions and decrease in importance for strongly anthropogenically perturbed conditions. The analysis indicates that the presence of surface-active species can lead to as much uncertainty as results from variations in updraft velocity. The presence of surfactant species also drastically changes the response of the cloud condensation nuclei to changes in the updraft velocity spectrum. Conditions are found under which an increase in dissolved organic compounds can actually lead to a decrease in cloud droplet number, a “contra-Twomey effect.” Results presented have more general implications than just for organic compounds and can apply, in principle, for any chemically induced activation effect.

[1]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in global climate models , 2003 .

[2]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Black carbon radiative heating effects on cloud microphysics and implications for the aerosol indirect effect 2. Cloud microphysics , 2002 .

[3]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Can chemical effects on cloud droplet number rival the first indirect effect? , 2002 .

[4]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[5]  S. Solberg,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 2002 .

[6]  D. Hegg,et al.  Laboratory studies of the efficiency of selected organic aerosols as CCN , 2001 .

[7]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Reshaping the Theory of Cloud Formation , 2001, Science.

[8]  S. Ghan,et al.  Kinetic limitations on cloud droplet formation and impact on cloud albedo , 2001 .

[9]  K. Suhre,et al.  On the parameterization of activation spectra from cloud condensation nuclei microphysical properties , 2000 .

[10]  H. Hansson,et al.  Organic atmospheric aerosols: Review and state of the science , 2000 .

[11]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types , 2000 .

[12]  M. Facchini,et al.  Cloud albedo enhancement by surface-active organic solutes in growing droplets , 1999, Nature.

[13]  George A. Isaac,et al.  Scale Effects on Averaging of Cloud Droplet and Aerosol Number Concentrations: Observations and Models , 1999 .

[14]  J. Curry,et al.  A simple analytical model of aerosol properties with account for hygroscopic growth 1. Equilibrium size spectra and cloud condensation nuclei activity spectra , 1999 .

[15]  J. Cohard,et al.  Extending Twomey’s Analytical Estimate of Nucleated Cloud Droplet Concentrations from CCN Spectra , 1998 .

[16]  S. Ghan,et al.  Competition between Sea Salt and Sulfate Particles as Cloud Condensation Nuclei , 1998 .

[17]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 1. Single aerosol type , 1998 .

[18]  U. Lohmann,et al.  The sulfate-CCN-cloud albedo effect: a sensitivity study with two general circulation models , 1996 .

[19]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  The sulfate‐CCN‐cloud albedo effect , 1995 .

[20]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of cloud droplet nucleation. Part II: Multiple aerosol types , 1995 .

[21]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of cloud droplet nucleation part I: single aerosol type , 1993 .

[22]  P. Hobbs,et al.  Light scattering and cloud condensation nucleus activity of sulfate aerosol measured over the northeast Atlantic Ocean , 1993 .

[23]  D. Covert,et al.  Atmospheric sulfur chemistry and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations over the northeastern Pacific Coast , 1993 .

[24]  P. Quinn,et al.  Dimethylsulfide/cloud condensation nuclei/climate system - Relevant size-resolved measurements of the chemical and physical properties of atmospheric aerosol particles , 1993 .

[25]  C. C. Chuang,et al.  A parameterization of cloud droplet nucleation , 1993 .

[26]  George A. Isaac,et al.  The relationship between cloud droplet number concentrations and anthropogenic pollution : observations and climatic implications , 1992 .

[27]  J. W. Fitzgerald,et al.  Marine aerosols: A review , 1991 .

[28]  J. Heintzenberg Fine particles in the global troposphere. A review , 1989 .

[29]  H. Pruppacher,et al.  A Numerical Determination of the Evolution of Cloud Drop Spectra due to Condensation on Natural Aerosol Particles , 1980 .

[30]  J. Klett,et al.  Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation , 1978, Nature.

[31]  K. T. Whitby THE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SULFUR AEROSOLS , 1978 .