Driven by two masters, serving both: the interplay of problem solving and research in information systems action research projects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Marshall,et al. Social constructionism with a twist of pragmatism: a suitable cocktail for information systems research , 2005 .
[2] G. Susman,et al. An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .
[3] Thomas H. Davenport,et al. Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud , 1999 .
[4] Colin Eden,et al. On evaluating the performance of 'wide-band' GDSS's , 1995 .
[5] N. Mitev. Constructivist and critical approaches to an IS failure case study: symmetry, translation and power , 2003 .
[6] David E. Avison,et al. Conclusions from Action Research: The Multiview Experience , 1991 .
[7] Rudy Hirschheim,et al. A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..
[8] Alison Clements,et al. Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide , 1995 .
[9] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Information Systems Research as Design: Identity, Process, and Narrative , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.
[10] Trevor Wood-Harper,et al. A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..
[11] M. El-den,et al. Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1993 .
[12] P. Reason. Pragmatist Philosophy and Action Research , 2003 .
[13] P. Checkland. From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .
[14] Maurice Landry,et al. A disciplined methodological pluralism for mis research , 1992 .
[15] Peter Axel Nielsen,et al. Competing values in software process improvement: an assumption analysis of CMM from an organizational culture perspective , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[16] T. Hindle,et al. Developing a Methodology for Multidisciplinary Action Research: A Case Study , 1995 .
[17] D. Ladkin. ‘The enigma of subjectivity’ , 2005 .
[18] S LeeAllen. Rigor and relevance in MIS research , 1999 .
[19] Judy McKay,et al. The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.
[20] Daniel Robey,et al. A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..
[21] J. Mingers,et al. A New Paradigm of Analysis , 2001 .
[22] C. Eden,et al. Action Research for Management Research , 1996 .
[23] Allen S. Lee. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone , 1999 .
[24] R. Rapoport. Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .
[25] Colin Eden,et al. Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[26] M. Alvesson,et al. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.
[27] R. Hirschheim. INFORMATION SYSTEMS EPISTEMOLOGY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .
[28] H. Bradbury,et al. Handbook of action research , 2006 .
[29] Izak Benbasat,et al. Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..
[30] Judy McKay,et al. A review of design science in information systems , 2005 .
[31] Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al. Groupware, social action and organizational emergence: On the process dynamics of computer mediated distributed work , 1998 .
[32] Shirley Gregor,et al. Design Theory in Information Systems , 2002, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..
[33] Dawn E. Chandler,et al. Transforming Inquiry and Action , 2003 .
[34] Bridget Somekh,et al. The Contribution of Action Research to Development in Social Endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology , 1995 .
[35] M. Denscombe. The Good Research Guide , 2003 .
[36] Lynette Kvasny,et al. Cores and Definitions: Building the Cognitive Legitimacy of the Information Systems Discipline Across the Atlantic , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.
[37] Mats Alvesson,et al. Postmodernism and social research , 2002 .
[38] Richard Baskerville,et al. Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..