Is real-time ultrasonic bladder volume estimation reliable and valid? A systematic overview.

To assess the reliability and validity of real-time ultrasonic estimation of bladder volume we conducted an overview of the published literature identified using MEDLINE search (1966-96) and scanning of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Short-listed papers were classified into reliability (observer agreement) and validity (comparison of ultrasound estimation with actual bladder volume) studies. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently in duplicate. There were 81 subjects enrolled in 3 reliability studies and 504 subjects in 16 validity studies. Where reported, the index of concordance for reliability ranged from 0.923 to 1.00, while for validity it ranged from 0.914 to 0.983. However, there were several inadequacies in the design, conduct and analysis of these studies, leaving some doubt about the trustworthiness of the high levels of reliability and validity reported in the literature.

[1]  H. Drutz,et al.  Accuracy of total bladder volume and residual urine measurements: comparison between real-time ultrasonography and catheterization. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  H. Holm,et al.  Ultrasonic determination of liver and spleem volumes. , 1971, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[3]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance , 1981 .

[4]  Graham Dunn,et al.  Review papers : Design and analysis of reliability studies , 1992 .

[5]  G. Fellows,et al.  The accuracy of a hand-held real time ultrasound scanner for estimating bladder volume. , 1983, British journal of urology.

[6]  P. Neven,et al.  The validity and reliability of real-time ultrasound estimation of bladder volume in postnatal women , 1996 .

[7]  G. Norman,et al.  Evaluating measurement variability in clinical investigations: the case of ultrasonic estimation of urinary bladder volume , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  L. Koran,et al.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  H. Chan.  Noninvasive Bladder Volume Measurement , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.

[10]  M. Kane.  A Sampling Model for Validity , 1982 .

[11]  R. Gibson,et al.  Real-time ultrasound measurement of bladder volume: a comparative study of three methods. , 1987, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  B. Haylen.  Verification of the accuracy and range of transvaginal ultrasound in measuring bladder volumes in women. , 1989, British journal of urology.

[13]  B. Haylen,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasound in the assessment of bladder volumes in women. Preliminary report. , 1989, British journal of urology.

[14]  C. Roehrborn,et al.  Can transabdominal ultrasound estimation of postvoiding residual (PVR) replace catheterization? , 1989, Urology.

[15]  H. Noto,et al.  Noninvasive screening procedure for evaluation of bladder emptying function. , 1985, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  R. Gibson,et al.  Measurement of bladder volume by real-time ultrasound. , 1987, British journal of urology.