Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Method Simulations of Cantilever Magnetoelectric Sensors

This paper investigates the suitability of two-dimensional (2D) finite-element method (FEM) simulations to model the quasi-static bending-mode response of cantilever magnetoelectric (ME) sensors. We compute the deformation of the cantilever due to an applied magnetic field across the magnetostrictive (MS) layer as well as the generated voltage across the piezoelectric (PE) layer by solving a system of coupled linear elastostatic/elastodynamic and electrostatic/magnetostatic equations. In the 2D FEM formulation a plane-stress boundary condition is employed. Both 2D and 3D FEM results are compared for varying cantilever length and width. For cantilevers with length >> height >> width good agreement is obtained between 2D and 3D results. For cantilevers obeying the condition length >> width >> height, a systematic deviation occurs between 2D and 3D results as the plane-stress condition does not model the situation in the center of the cantilever. For a length:width:height ratio of 25:5:1, a difference in generated voltage of ~12% is obtained for the Terfenol-D-PZT-Si material system. Especially for cantilevers with high aspect ratios, we show that 2D FEM simulations are sufficient to investigate the ME properties.

[1]  Markys G. Cain,et al.  A new magnetic recording read head technology based on the magneto-electric effect , 2007 .

[2]  Eckhard Quandt,et al.  Low damping resonant magnetoelectric sensors , 2010 .

[3]  C. Nan,et al.  Multiferroic Magnetoelectric Composites: Historical Perspective, Status, and Future Directions , 2008, Progress in Advanced Dielectrics.

[4]  M. Gerken,et al.  Theory of magnetoelectric effect in multilayer nanocomposites on a substrate: Static bending-mode response , 2013 .

[5]  N. Tiercelin,et al.  Enhanced magnetoelectric effect in nanostructured magnetostrictive thin film resonant actuator with field induced spin reorientation transition , 2008 .

[6]  M. Gerken Resonance line shape, strain and electric potential distributions of composite magnetoelectric sensors , 2013 .

[7]  Eckhard Quandt,et al.  MEMS magnetic field sensor based on magnetoelectric composites , 2012 .

[8]  S. Mathews,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of all-thin-film magnetoelectric sensors , 2009 .

[9]  Markys G. Cain,et al.  Verified finite element simulation of multiferroic structures: Solutions for conducting and insulating systems , 2008 .

[10]  N. Mathur,et al.  Equivalence of direct and converse magnetoelectric coefficients in strain-coupled two-phase systems , 2012 .

[11]  S. Dong,et al.  A resonance-bending mode magnetoelectric-coupling equivalent circuit , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  L. Daniel,et al.  Finite Element Harmonic Modeling of Magnetoelectric Effect , 2011, IEEE transactions on magnetics.

[13]  G. Srinivasan,et al.  Theory of low-frequency magnetoelectric coupling in magnetostrictive-piezoelectric bilayers , 2003, cond-mat/0307264.

[14]  B. Wagner,et al.  Giant magnetoelectric coefficients in (Fe90Co10)78Si12B10-AlN thin film composites , 2010 .

[15]  L. Daniel,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Magnetoelectric Sensors , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  G. Srinivasan,et al.  Enhancement of magnetoelectric coupling in functionally graded ferroelectric and ferromagnetic bilayers , 2008 .

[17]  X. Mininger,et al.  3D finite element model for magnetoelectric sensors , 2010 .