Divergent Reactions to Convergent Strategies: Investor Beliefs and Analyst Reactions During Technological Change

An important outcome of technological change is industry "convergence," as a new technology spurs competition between established firms from different industries. We study the reactions of securities analysts, as important sources of institutional pressures for firms, to the similar product/market strategies undertaken by firms from different prior industries responding to industry convergence. Our empirical setting is the convergence between the wireline telecommunications and cable television industries in the period following the advent of voice over Internet protocol technology. Controlling for firm financial performance and capabilities, we find that analysts were consistently more positive toward the cable firms than toward the wireline telecom firms. Our findings further show that this divergence in reactions arises from differences in existing investor expectations and preferences concerning how firms create value; stocks owned by investors with a greater preference for growth receive more positive reactions than those owned by investors with a greater preference for margins. However, this divergence in reactions shrinks over time as convergence unfolds and as investors shift their shareholdings in response to misalignment between their preferences and firms' strategic changes. Reactions from analysts-reflecting inertial expectations of investors-may persist for a time despite changes to firms' strategies, thus creating challenges for some firms in responding to technological change and industry convergence while legitimating and enabling similar responses from their competitors.

[1]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[2]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  James D. Westphal,et al.  The Pacification of Institutional Investors , 2008 .

[4]  Carolyn B. Levine,et al.  Earnings Predictability and Bias in Analysts? Earnings Forecasts , 1998 .

[5]  K. Petroni,et al.  Analysts' Incentives and Street Earnings , 2009 .

[6]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[7]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[8]  Roni Michaely,et al.  Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations , 1999 .

[9]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  Stock Prices and Financial Analysts' Recommendations , 1983 .

[10]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Sources of Durability and Change in Market Classifications: A Study of the Reconstitution of Product Categories in the American Mutual Fund Industry, 1944-1985 , 2004 .

[11]  Ran Barniv,et al.  Do Analysts Practice What They Preach and Should Investors Listen? Effects of Recent Regulations , 2008 .

[12]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Sociopolitical Dynamics In Relations Between Top Managers and Security Analysts: Favor Rendering, Reciprocity, and Analyst Stock Recommendations , 2008 .

[13]  Catherine M. Dalton,et al.  A changing of the guard: executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements , 2005 .

[14]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Consensus Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns , 1998 .

[15]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  David M. Drukker,et al.  Testing for Serial Correlation in Linear Panel-data Models , 2003 .

[17]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[18]  Jeffrey D. Kubik,et al.  Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings Forecasts , 2003 .

[19]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[20]  Katherine Schipper,et al.  on Analysts ' Forecasts , 2005 .

[21]  Andrew Winton,et al.  Ownership Structure, Speculation, and Shareholder Intervention , 1998 .

[22]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  New Directions in Corporate Governance , 2005 .

[23]  Rajshree Agarwal Strategic renewal of organizations , 2009 .

[24]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[25]  Kent L. Womack,et al.  Wall Street's Credibility Problem: Misaligned Incentives and Dubious Fixes? , 2002 .

[26]  C. Maritan CAPITAL INVESTMENT AS INVESTING IN ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITIES: AN EMPIRICALLY GROUNDED PROCESS MODEL , 2001 .

[27]  R. Henderson Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence From the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry , 2015 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[29]  Y. Amihud,et al.  Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers , 1981 .

[30]  胡盛昌,et al.  《The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior》述评 , 2012 .

[31]  David A. Miller,et al.  Was There Too Little Entry During the Dot Com Era , 2007 .

[32]  Gwendolyn K. Lee The significance of network resources in the race to enter emerging product markets: the convergence of telephony communications and computer networking, 1989–2001 , 2007 .

[33]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Offsetting Illegitimacy? How Pressures from Securities Analysts Influence Incumbents in the Face of New Technologies , 2012 .

[34]  J. Dutton,et al.  Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .

[35]  Mary J. Benner The incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change , 2007 .

[36]  Hong Qian Time Variation in Analyst Optimism: An Investor Sentiment Explanation , 2009 .

[37]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[38]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Corporate Strategy, Analyst Coverage, and the Uniqueness Paradox , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Calculators, Lemmings or Frame-Makers? The Intermediary Role of Securities Analysts , 2007 .

[40]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[41]  Jennifer Francis,et al.  ANALYSTS DECISIONS AS PRODUCTS OF A MULTITASK ENVIRONMENT , 1993 .

[42]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Do Innovations Really Payoff? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[43]  Jens O. Riis,et al.  Looking into the Future , 1998, Games in Operations Management.

[44]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[45]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[46]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence , 1997 .

[47]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U. S. , 2000 .

[48]  Jennifer F. Reinganum Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[49]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[50]  Kent L. Womack Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value? , 1996 .

[51]  Florin P. Vasvari,et al.  Wealth Transfer Effects of Analysts' Misleading Behavior , 2007 .

[52]  Mary J. Benner Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  Strategic Risk and Corporate Performance: an Analysis of Alternative Risk Measures , 1990 .

[54]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Product Demography of De Novo and De Alio Firms in the Optical Disk Drive Industry, 1983-1999 , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[55]  Richard S. Rosenbloom,et al.  Managerial Commitments and Technological Change in the US Tire Industry , 1997 .

[56]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[57]  Frank T. Magiera Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value? , 2004 .

[58]  Stephen P. Bradley,et al.  Winners and Losers--Industry Structure in the Converging World of Telecommunications, Computing, and Entertainment , 1997 .

[59]  Heather A. Haveman,et al.  Risky Business? Entrepreneurship in the New Independent-Power Sector , 2005 .

[60]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[61]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Institutional Sources of Boundary-Spanning Structures: the Establishment of Investor Relations Departments in the Fortune 500 Industrials , 1999 .

[62]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance , 2002 .

[63]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Focusing the Corporate Product: Securities Analysts and De-diversification , 2000 .

[64]  Fabrizio Maria Maggi,et al.  Looking into the Future. Using Timed Automata to Provide a Priori Advice about Timed Declarative Process Models , 2012, OTM Conferences.

[65]  Massimo Guidolin,et al.  Affiliated Mutual Funds and Analyst Optimism , 2007 .

[66]  Brian J. Bushee The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior , 1999 .

[67]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Stock market reaction to strategic investment decisions , 1990 .

[68]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Shrewd, crude or simply deluded? Comovement and the internet stock phenomenon , 2004 .

[69]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of 'The Digital Photography Company' , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Event Studies In Management Research: Theoretical And Empirical Issues , 1997 .

[71]  Nicholas Barberis,et al.  Style Investing , 2000 .

[72]  Jeffrey D. Kubik,et al.  Security Analysts' Career Concerns and Herding of Earnings Forecasts , 1998 .

[73]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[74]  E. Ofek,et al.  Diversification's effect on firm value , 1995 .

[75]  M. Bradshaw How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations , 2004 .

[76]  M. Bradshaw How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations? , 2000 .

[77]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[78]  Volkan Muslu,et al.  Why are recommendations optimistic? Evidence from analysts’ coverage initiations , 2010 .

[79]  S. Kotha,et al.  Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry , 1995 .

[80]  James D. Westphal,et al.  A MATTER OF APPEARANCES: HOW CORPORATE LEADERS MANAGE THE IMPRESSIONS OF FINANCIAL ANALYSTS ABOUT THE CONDUCT OF THEIR BOARDS , 2010 .

[81]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Capability Reconfiguration: An Analysis of Incumbent Responses to Technological Change , 2006 .

[82]  Margarethe Wiersema,et al.  CEO Dismissal: The Role of Investment Analysts , 2011 .

[83]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[84]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Vicarious Learning in New Product Introductions in the Early Years of a Converging Market , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[85]  W. Mitchell Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value , 1991 .