Evaluating innovation in studio physics
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ronald K. Thornton | Karen Cummings | Dennis Kuhl | R. Thornton | D. Kuhl | K. Cummings | J. Marx | Jeffrey Marx | Dennis Kuhl
[1] Patricia A. Heller,et al. Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups , 1992 .
[2] Jeffery M. Saul,et al. On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories , 1997 .
[3] Patricia A. Heller,et al. Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving , 1992 .
[4] John J. Clement,et al. Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .
[5] D. Hestenes,et al. Force concept inventory , 1992 .
[6] Ronald K. Thornton,et al. Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .
[7] D. Sokoloff,et al. Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment , 1997 .
[8] Pamela Ann Kraus. Promoting active learning in lecture-based courses: Demonstrations, tutorials, and interactive tutorial lectures , 1997 .
[9] Mariana G. Hewson,et al. The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction , 1984 .
[10] R. Hake. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .
[11] Jack M. Wilson. The CUPLE physics studio , 1994 .
[12] Ronald K. Thornton,et al. Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .