Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Noninvasive assessment of the hemodynamic significance of carotid stenosis is often performed with MR angiography and supplemented with carotid Doppler sonography. Phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (PC-VIPR), a novel MR imaging technique, accelerates phase-contrast MR flow imaging and provides both images of the vessels and measurements of blood-flow velocities. For this study, we determined the accuracy of PC-VIPR blood-flow velocity measurements to determine pressure gradients across an experimental carotid stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A focal stenosis was surgically created in each common carotid artery of 6 canines. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed, and the degree of stenosis was determined using the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial methodology. A microcatheter was positioned in the carotid artery proximal and distal to the stenosis, and pressures were measured in the vessel through the catheter. PC-VIPR was then performed on a 1.5T MR imaging scanner with parameters producing 0.8-mm isotropic voxel resolution. From the velocity measurements, pressure gradients were calculated from the Navier-Stokes relationship to compare with the pressures measured by a catheter. RESULTS Carotid stenoses in the 50%-85% range were produced in the 12 arteries. Pressure gradients across the stenoses ranged from 6 to 26 mm Hg. The pressure gradient calculated from the PC-VIPR data correlated (r = 0.91, P < .0001) with the actual pressure measurements. CONCLUSION With PC-VIPR, a novel MR imaging technique, the hemodynamic effect of a stenosis on flow and pressure can be evaluated.

[1]  F. Korosec,et al.  PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  Amir A Amini,et al.  Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase‐contrast MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Charles A Mistretta,et al.  Noise reduction in MR angiography with nonlinear anisotropic filtering , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Y. Aude,et al.  How to prevent unnecessary coronary interventions: identifying lesions responsible for ischemia in the cath lab , 2003, Current opinion in cardiology.

[5]  Richard B Thompson,et al.  Fast measurement of intracardiac pressure differences with 2D breath‐hold phase‐contrast MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Preoperative Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Noninvasive Testing , 2002, Stroke.

[7]  J Waigand,et al.  Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  D. Laidlaw,et al.  Three‐dimensional, time‐resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Normalisation of abnormal coronary fractional flow reserve associated with myocardial bridging using an intracoronary stent , 2000, Heart.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[11]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) , 1998, The Lancet.

[13]  W. Mali,et al.  Intraarterial pressure gradients after randomized angioplasty or stenting of iliac artery lesions , 1996, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[14]  D N Firmin,et al.  Computation of flow pressure fields from magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  P. J. Keller,et al.  Clinical significance of the flow gap in carotid magnetic resonance angiography. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  S. Rose,et al.  Intraarterial pressure measurements during angiographic evaluation of peripheral vascular disease: techniques, interpretation, applications, and limitations. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[18]  R. Edelman,et al.  Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? , 1995, Stroke.

[19]  J. Palmaz,et al.  Iliac artery stent placement with the Palmaz stent: follow-up study. , 1995, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[20]  P A Turski,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates. , 1993, Surgery.

[21]  H. Winn,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. , 1991, JAMA.

[22]  Ralph G. Dacey,et al.  Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis , 1991 .

[23]  J. Palmaz,et al.  Placement of balloon-expandable intraluminal stents in iliac arteries: first 171 procedures. , 1990, Radiology.

[24]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[25]  R. White,et al.  Long-term results of aortoiliac angioplasty. , 1983, Surgery.

[26]  G. Moneta,et al.  Measuring Carotid Stenosis on Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Diagnostic Performance and Reproducibility of 3 Different Methods , 2006 .