Reciprocal Gut Microbiota Transplants from Zebrafish and Mice to Germ-free Recipients Reveal Host Habitat Selection

The gut microbiotas of zebrafish and mice share six bacterial divisions, although the specific bacteria within these divisions differ. To test how factors specific to host gut habitat shape microbial community structure, we performed reciprocal transplantations of these microbiotas into germ-free zebrafish and mouse recipients. The results reveal that communities are assembled in predictable ways. The transplanted community resembles its community of origin in terms of the lineages present, but the relative abundance of the lineages changes to resemble the normal gut microbial community composition of the recipient host. Thus, differences in community structure between zebrafish and mice arise in part from distinct selective pressures imposed within the gut habitat of each host. Nonetheless, vertebrate responses to microbial colonization of the gut are ancient: Functional genomic studies disclosed shared host responses to their compositionally distinct microbial communities and distinct microbial species that elicit conserved responses.

[1]  K. Giller,et al.  Distribution and diversity of rhizobia nodulating agroforestry legumes in soils from three continents in the tropics , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[2]  L. Gram,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of the intestinal microbial community of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) , 2004, Journal of applied microbiology.

[3]  James H. Brown,et al.  Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[4]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. Sloan,et al.  Prokaryotic diversity and its limits: microbial community structure in nature and implications for microbial ecology. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[6]  M. L. Chow,et al.  Molecular characterization of bacterial diversity from British Columbia forest soils subjected to disturbance. , 2002, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[7]  K. Schleifer,et al.  ARB: a software environment for sequence data. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Jennifer M. Bates,et al.  Distinct signals from the microbiota promote different aspects of zebrafish gut differentiation. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[9]  R. Knight,et al.  UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  Ting Wang,et al.  The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Host-Bacterial Mutualism in the Human Intestine , 2005, Science.

[12]  Ben Bolstad,et al.  Low-level Analysis of High-density Oligonucleotide Array Data: Background, Normalization and Summarization , 2003 .

[13]  I. Good THE POPULATION FREQUENCIES OF SPECIES AND THE ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PARAMETERS , 1953 .

[14]  M. Brent,et al.  Molecular Properties of Adult Mouse Gastric and Intestinal Epithelial Progenitors in Their Niches* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  B. Wostmann The germfree animal in nutritional studies. , 1981, Annual review of nutrition.

[16]  A. Oates,et al.  Morphologic and functional characterization of granulocytes and macrophages in embryonic and adult zebrafish. , 2001, Blood.

[17]  E. Purdom,et al.  Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora , 2005, Science.

[18]  Benjamin P. Westover,et al.  Glycan Foraging in Vivo by an Intestine-Adapted Bacterial Symbiont , 2005, Science.

[19]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Handelsman,et al.  Introducing DOTUR, a Computer Program for Defining Operational Taxonomic Units and Estimating Species Richness , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  L. Zon,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: zebrafish , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  J. Gordon,et al.  29 Combining gnotobiotic mouse models with functional genomics to define the impact of the microflora on host physiology , 2002 .

[23]  J. Cebra,et al.  Influences of microbiota on intestinal immune system development. , 1999, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[24]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[25]  S. Acinas,et al.  Fine-scale phylogenetic architecture of a complex bacterial community , 2004, Nature.

[26]  M. Stephens,et al.  Traces of Human Migrations in Helicobacter pylori Populations , 2003, Science.

[27]  J. Gordon,et al.  Gnotobiotic zebrafish reveal evolutionarily conserved responses to the gut microbiota. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. Navarrete,et al.  16S rDNA-Based Analysis of Dominant Bacterial Populations Associated with Early Life Stages of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) , 2006, Microbial Ecology.

[29]  M. Fishman,et al.  Discovery and use of small molecules for probing biological processes in zebrafish. , 2004, Methods in cell biology.

[30]  Marian M. Cahill Bacterial flora of fishes: A review , 2005, Microbial Ecology.

[31]  J. Gordon,et al.  Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut , 2001, Science.

[32]  Scott R. Miller,et al.  Unexpected Diversity and Complexity of the Guerrero Negro Hypersaline Microbial Mat , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  Lynn K. Carmichael,et al.  A Genomic View of the Human-Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Symbiosis , 2003, Science.

[34]  R. Ley,et al.  Ecological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine , 2006, Cell.