Marginal Time-Dependent Causal Effects in Mediation Analysis With Survival Data.

The main aim of mediation analysis is to study the direct and indirect effects of an exposure on an outcome. To date, the literature on mediation analysis with multiple mediators has mainly focused on continuous and dichotomous outcomes. However, the development of methods for multiple mediation analysis of survival outcomes is still limited. Here we extend to survival outcomes a method for multiple mediation analysis based on the computation of appropriate weights. The approach considered has the advantages of not requiring specific models for mediators, allowing nonindependent mediators of any nature, and not relying on the assumption of rare outcomes. Simulation studies show good performance of the proposed estimator in terms of bias and coverage probability. The method is further applied to an example from a published study on prostate cancer mortality aimed at understanding the extent to which the effect of DNA methyltransferase 3b (DNMT3b) genotype on mortality was explained by DNA methylation and tumor aggressiveness. This approach can be used to quantify the marginal time-dependent direct and indirect effects carried by multiple indirect pathways, and software code is provided to facilitate its application.

[1]  Yen-Tsung Huang,et al.  Mediation analysis for survival data using semiparametric probit models , 2016, Biometrics.

[2]  Masataka Taguri,et al.  Causal mediation analysis with multiple causally non-ordered mediators , 2018, Statistical methods in medical research.

[3]  Tyler J VanderWeele,et al.  Causal Mediation Analysis With Survival Data , 2011, Epidemiology.

[4]  T J VanderWeele,et al.  Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators , 2014, Epidemiologic methods.

[5]  Ilya Shpitser,et al.  Semiparametric Theory for Causal Mediation Analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis. , 2012, Annals of statistics.

[6]  P. Royston,et al.  Flexible parametric proportional‐hazards and proportional‐odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Stijn Vansteelandt,et al.  Interventional Effects for Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators. , 2017, Epidemiology.

[8]  Kristin E. Porter,et al.  Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[10]  N. Pearce,et al.  DNA methyltransferase 3b (DNMT3b), tumor tissue DNA methylation, Gleason score, and prostate cancer mortality: investigating causal relationships , 2012, Cancer Causes & Control.

[11]  Olof Akre,et al.  Promoter methylation in APC, RUNX3, and GSTP1 and mortality in prostate cancer patients. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  Practical guidance for conducting mediation analysis with multiple mediators using inverse odds ratio weighting. , 2015, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  J. Pearl,et al.  Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference , 1999 .

[14]  L. Keele,et al.  A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis , 2010, Psychological methods.

[15]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Flexible Mediation Analysis With Multiple Mediators. , 2017, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  Tyler J VanderWeele,et al.  Mediation analysis for a survival outcome with time‐varying exposures, mediators, and confounders , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  L. Thygesen,et al.  Assessing natural direct and indirect effects through multiple pathways. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators , 2014, Biometrics.

[20]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Flexible Parametric Alternatives to the Cox Model: Update , 2004 .

[21]  Wenjing Zheng,et al.  Longitudinal Mediation Analysis with Time-varying Mediators and Exposures, with Application to Survival Outcomes , 2017, Journal of causal inference.

[22]  J. Albert,et al.  Causal mediation analysis for the Cox proportional hazards model with a smooth baseline hazard estimator , 2017, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics.

[23]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Hwai I. Yang,et al.  Causal Mediation Analysis of Survival Outcome with Multiple Mediators , 2017, Epidemiology.

[25]  Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome. , 2011 .

[26]  Jeffrey M Albert,et al.  Generalized Causal Mediation Analysis , 2011, Biometrics.

[27]  Theis Lange,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects in a Survival Context , 2011, Epidemiology.

[28]  Stijn Vansteelandt,et al.  A simple unified approach for estimating natural direct and indirect effects. , 2012, American journal of epidemiology.

[29]  James M. Robins,et al.  Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder. , 2014, Epidemiology.

[30]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition , 2009 .

[31]  Stijn Vansteelandt,et al.  Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  Inverse Odds Ratio-Weighted Estimation for Causal Mediation Analysis , 2013 .