The “Similarity Index” as an Indicator of Shared Mental Models and Situation Awareness in Field Studies

The aim of this paper is to present a methodology where the extent of information sharing among team members is used as an indicator of shared mental models (SMM) and situation awareness (SA). Data collection procedures and probe materials are described for two field experiments performed among emergency management teams in the hydrocarbon industry. Methods are suggested for calculating a “similarity index” by comparing a team member’s responses with the average response in the team or with the responses of the team member assumed to be best informed. It is argued that similarity to team average could be a measure of SMM, whereas similarity to the best-informed team member could be argued to be an indicator of SA. The degree of compliance in responding to the probes is reported, as is the degree to which the extent of shared information differed between the probe questions or according to team positions. Lessons learned from the data collection are summarized, and the applicability of the similarity index as a measure of SA is discussed. Some advantages of the current approach are presented, as are challenges and inherent assumptions in future applications of this approach.

[1]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[2]  I D Brown,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE 'LOOKED BUT FAILED TO SEE' ACCIDENT CAUSATION FACTOR , 2002 .

[3]  E. Salas,et al.  Toward an understanding of team performance and training. , 1992 .

[4]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[5]  E. Salas,et al.  Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: the power of team performance diagnosis. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  Lelyn D. Saner,et al.  Measuring and Predicting Shared Situation Awareness in Teams , 2009 .

[7]  N. Sarter,et al.  Capturing the dynamics of attention control from individual to distributed systems: the shape of models to come , 2010 .

[8]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Mark Schafer,et al.  Individual and Group Decision Making , 2011 .

[10]  I. Janis Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .

[11]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[12]  Mike Schneider,et al.  Modeling Shared Situation Awareness , 2005 .

[13]  Adel Guitouni,et al.  The role of metacognition in the relationship between objective and subjective measures of situation awareness , 2010 .

[14]  Bjørn Sætrevik Developing a context-general self-report approach to measure three-level situation awareness. , 2013, International maritime health.

[15]  E. Salas,et al.  Individual and team decision making under stress: Theoretical underpinnings. , 1998 .

[16]  Graham K Edgar,et al.  QUASA: Quantifying and analysing situational awareness , 2000 .

[17]  M R Endsley,et al.  Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  Michael D. Matthews,et al.  A Comparison of Expert Ratings and Self-Assessments of Situation Awareness During a Combat Fatigue Course , 2011 .

[19]  Phillip L. Morgan,et al.  Approaches to understanding, analysing and developing situation awareness , 2010 .

[20]  B. McGuinness,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Situational Awareness (QUASA): Applying Signal Detection Theory to True/False Probes and Self-Ratings , 2004 .

[21]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[22]  Mayer Nudell,et al.  The Handbook for Effective Emergency and Crisis Management , 1988 .

[23]  J. Hahn Victims Of Groupthink A Psychological Study Of Foreign Policy Decisions And Fiascoes , 2016 .

[24]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation awareness: some remaining questions , 2010 .

[25]  Neville Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Shared Mental Models - A Conceptual Analysis , 2010, COIN@AAMAS&MALLOW.

[27]  Endsley,et al.  A model of inter- and intrateam situation awareness: implications for design, training and measurement , 2001 .