A taxonomy for proactive public services

[1]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Inclusion through proactive public services: findings from the Netherlands: Classifying and designing proactivity through understanding service eligibility and delivery processes , 2021, DG.O.

[2]  Karl Kristian Larsson,et al.  Digitization or equality: When government automation covers some, but not all citizens , 2020, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Dian Balta,et al.  How to Redesign Government Processes for Proactive Public Services? , 2021, EGOV.

[4]  L. S. Ganesh,et al.  Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[5]  Dirk Draheim,et al.  Identifying design principles for proactive services through systematically understanding the reactivity-proactivity spectrum , 2020, ICEGOV.

[6]  Uichin Lee,et al.  Hello There! Is Now a Good Time to Talk? , 2020, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[7]  L. Nicod,et al.  Customer proactive training vs customer reactive training in retail store settings: Effects on script proficiency, customer satisfaction, and sales volume , 2020 .

[8]  Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah,et al.  Elucidating salespeople's market orientation, proactive service behavior and organizational culture in the B2B banking sector: a Malaysian perspective , 2020 .

[9]  C. V. Rico.  Personalización, proactividad e inteligencia artificial. ¿Un nuevo paradigma para la prestación electrónica de servicios públicos? , 2020 .

[10]  Stefan Tönnissen,et al.  Understanding token-based ecosystems – a taxonomy of blockchain-based business models of start-ups , 2020, Electronic Markets.

[11]  Dennis Kundisch,et al.  Software tools for business model innovation: current state and future challenges , 2019, Electronic Markets.

[12]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  A hierarchical taxonomy of business model patterns , 2018, Electronic Markets.

[13]  M. Röglinger,et al.  Pushing the Frontiers of Service Research - A Taxonomy of Proactive Services , 2020, ICIS.

[14]  Dian Balta,et al.  Service Quality Through Government Proactivity: The Concept of Non-interaction , 2020, EGOV.

[15]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Was sind Herausforderungen proaktiver Verwaltungsleistungen in Deutschland? , 2020, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[16]  Dirk Draheim,et al.  Stage Models for Moving from E-Government to Smart Government , 2019, EGOSE.

[17]  Jan U. Becker,et al.  Impact of Proactive Postsales Service and Cross-Selling Activities on Customer Churn and Service Calls , 2019, Journal of Service Research.

[18]  Sara Hofmann,et al.  Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Ida Lindgren,et al.  The Long and Winding Road of Digital Public Services - One Next Step: Proactivity , 2019, ICIS.

[20]  Dennis Kundisch,et al.  Because Your Taxonomy is Worth IT: towards a Framework for Taxonomy Evaluation , 2019, ECIS.

[21]  Stefan Eicker,et al.  Understanding Services in the Era of the Internet of Things: a Smart Service Taxonomy , 2019, ECIS.

[22]  Philipp Ebel,et al.  Understanding the Anatomy of Analytics-based Services - a Taxonomy to Conceptualize the Use of Data and Analytics in Services , 2019, ECIS.

[23]  R. Thaler,et al.  Choice Architecture , 2010 .

[24]  Stephen A. Woods,et al.  Standing in my customer's shoes: Effects of customer‐oriented perspective taking on proactive service performance , 2018, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

[25]  Kamen Spassov,et al.  Establishing Efficient Governance through Data-Driven e-Government , 2018, ICEGOV.

[26]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Conceptualizing business-to-thing interactions – A sociomaterial perspective on the Internet of Things , 2017, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Calvin Zhou-Peng Liao,et al.  Proactive e-Governance: Flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan , 2015, Government Information Quarterly.

[28]  Leon Sterling,et al.  A conceptual framework for effective appropriation of proactive public e-services , 2018 .

[29]  Luís Soares Barbosa,et al.  A taxonomy for planning and designing smart mobility services , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Marek Kowalkiewicz,et al.  From One-stop-shop to no-stop-shop: an E-Government stage Model , 2019, ECIS.

[31]  Peter Gomber,et al.  A taxonomy of financial market manipulations: establishing trust and market integrity in the financialized economy through automated fraud detection , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[32]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Employing proactive interaction for service failure prevention to improve customer service experiences , 2017 .

[33]  Owais Qayum,et al.  FenceBook a Geofencing based Advertisements Application Using Android , 2016 .

[34]  Kuldar Taveter,et al.  Bringing Service Design Thinking into the Public Sector to Create Proactive and User-Friendly Public Services , 2016, HCI.

[35]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Digital Government and Administrative Burden Reduction , 2016, ICEGOV.

[37]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences , 2016 .

[38]  David S. DeGeest,et al.  Tackling the Problem of Construct Proliferation , 2016 .

[39]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Proactive Customer Education, Customer Retention, and Demand for Technology Support: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2015, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[40]  Li Guo,et al.  Nudge Better Quantified-Self with Context-Aware and Proactive Services , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.

[41]  Jacky Akoka,et al.  A Taxonomy of Evaluation Methods for Information Systems Artifacts , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Björn Axelsson,et al.  Towards a managerially useful approach to classifying services , 2015 .

[43]  Philipp Mayring,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures , 2015 .

[44]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  Proactive privacy practices in transition: Toward ubiquitous services , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[46]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Ida Lindgren,et al.  Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Decisions by Default , 2012 .

[49]  Vassilis Koutkias,et al.  On Location-Based Services for Patient Empowerment, Guidance and Safety , 2011, MobiHealth.

[50]  Jae-Hyun Kim,et al.  An interactive cyber-physical system (CPS) for people with disability and frail elderly people , 2011, ICUIMC '11.

[51]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  Martin Brüggemeier.  Auf dem Weg zur No-Stop-Verwaltung , 2010 .

[53]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Proactive Postsales Service: When and why does it Pay Off? , 2009 .

[54]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Citizen-centered e-government services: benefits, costs, and research needs , 2008, DG.O.

[55]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  Ubiquitous Customer Relationship Management (uCRM) , 2007, RSKT.

[56]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Kostas S. Metaxiotis,et al.  Organising Municipal e-Government Systems: A Multi-facet Taxonomy of e-Services for Citizens and Businesses , 2006, EGOV.

[58]  Euiho Suh,et al.  ubiES: Applying ubiquitous computing technologies to an expert system for context-aware proactive services , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[59]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda , 2006, Internet Res..

[60]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[61]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Is Context-Aware Computing Taking Control away from the User? Three Levels of Interactivity Examined , 2003, UbiComp.

[62]  Kevin B Smith,et al.  Typologies, Taxonomies, and the Benefits of Policy Classification , 2002 .

[63]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[64]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[65]  Rebecca Green,et al.  Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques , 1996 .

[66]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Contemporary Application-Domain Taxonomies , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[67]  P. Rich.  The Organizational Taxonomy: Definition and Design , 1992 .

[68]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[69]  Alberto Marradi,et al.  Classification, typology, taxonomy , 1990 .

[70]  C. Lovelock.  Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights , 1983 .