Short- and long-term outcomes in octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting.

AIMS To investigate the incidence of cardiac events in octogenarians who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting, as well as to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS The study included 6,129 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with stenting from 2000 to 2005 in our centre, of whom 291 (4.7%) were octogenarians. After adjusting for confounders, age ≥80 years appeared a significant predictor of high mortality at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-3.01), and four years (aHR 2.25, 95% CI 1.77-2.85). No differences were seen with respect to incident myocardial infarction (MI), but target lesion (63.2 vs. 32.6 per 1,000 person-years at one year and 27.9 vs. 16.6 per 1,000 person-years at four years) and vessel (83.1 vs. 52.9 per 1,000 person-years at one year and 37.7 vs. 25.0 per 1,000 person-years at four years) revascularisation rates were lower in octogenarians. When comparing DES with bare metal stents (BMS) in octogenarians, mortality and MI rates were comparable, but there was a significantly lower incidence of target lesion revascularisation at one- (9.5 vs. 0.6 per 1,000 person-years, aHR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.57) and four-year (3.4 vs. 0.7 per 1,000 person-years, aHR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.59) follow-up in patients who received a DES. CONCLUSIONS Octogenarians undergoing PCI with stenting have an increased mortality risk, whereas the rates of repeat revascularisation in octogenarians are lower. This study suggests that the benefit of DES in reducing revascularisation rates is extended to elderly patients.

[1]  C. Granger,et al.  Mortality and morbidity reduction by primary percutaneous coronary intervention is independent of the patient's age. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  G. De Luca,et al.  Benefits of drug-eluting stents as compared to bare metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: four year results of the PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting stent vs bare metal stent in primary angiOplasty (PASEO) randomized trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[3]  A. Kirtane,et al.  5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  G. Stone,et al.  Long-Term Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Outcomes in Elderly Patients , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  J. Alpert,et al.  A 30-Year Perspective (1975–2005) Into the Changing Landscape of Patients Hospitalized With Initial Acute Myocardial Infarction: Worcester Heart Attack Study , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[6]  R. Costa,et al.  Drug-eluting stents in the elderly: long-term (> one year) clinical outcomes of octogenarians in the DESIRE (Drug-Eluting Stents In the REal world) registry. , 2008, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[7]  C. Reid,et al.  An evaluation of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  J. Alpert,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[9]  S. Schneider,et al.  Outcome in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents: results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry. , 2007, American heart journal.

[10]  M. Naylor,et al.  Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. , 2007, Circulation.

[11]  N. Weissman,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stents in octogenarians: Characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  The unrestricted use of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in an unselected population: one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registry. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  P. Serruys,et al.  Impact of baseline renal function on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents or bare metal stents. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Utilization of Early Invasive Management Strategies for High-Risk Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative , 2004 .

[15]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with that of thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2004 .

[16]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”: The R apamycin-E luting S tent E valuated A t R otterdam C ardiology H ospital (RESEARCH) Registry , 2004, Circulation.

[17]  W. Kannel,et al.  Coronary heart disease risk in people 65 years of age and older. , 2003, Progress in cardiovascular nursing.

[18]  K. Alexander,et al.  Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, JAMA.

[19]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Coronary artery stenting in the elderly: short-term outcome and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.