Optimization strategies for chiral separation by true moving bed chromatography using Particles Swarm Optimization (PSO) and new Parallel PSO variant

Abstract The Particles Swarm Optimization (PSO) is an optimization technique that has been gaining attention in the last years. In this work, the PSO method is applied to optimize the productivity and the eluent consumption of the separation of the bi-naphthol enantiomers in a True Moving Bed (TMB) device. Three optimization strategies are presented: the two-steps optimization, the single optimization and a new version of the PSO algorithm, the Parallel PSO. All the three strategies showed to be efficient to perform the desired optimization. Comparing in terms of productivity and computation time (represented by the number of iterations), the Parallel PSO appeared to be the best compromise, which emphasizes the relevance of this new version to perform the optimization of the mentioned separation process. Generally, The TMB optimization results presented in this work had an average productivity that was 30% higher than the results previously reported in the literature. The best result was obtained using the Parallel PSO strategy in which a productivity of 209.2 g/Lads/day (corresponding to an eluent consumption of only 83.9 dL/g) was achieved. As the TMB is only a theoretical model, simulations with Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) devices with four, eight and twelve columns were obtained using the equivalence between the two models, and the results were compared.

[1]  Lee D. Wilson,et al.  Flocculation Optimization of Orthophosphate with FeCl3 and Alginate Using the Box–Behnken Response Surface Methodology , 2017 .

[2]  Luís Manuel Santos Pais,et al.  Chiral separation by simulated moving bed chromatography , 1999 .

[3]  Shiyuan Sun,et al.  Parameter estimation of methanol transformation into olefins through improved particle swarm optimization with attenuation function , 2014 .

[4]  Ulf Grenander,et al.  A stochastic nonlinear model for coordinated bird flocks , 1990 .

[5]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Enhanced Simulated Moving Bed Reactor Process for Butyl Acrylate Synthesis: Process Analysis and Optimization , 2016 .

[6]  Yoshiaki Kawajiri,et al.  Simultaneous modeling and optimization of nonlinear simulated moving bed chromatography by the prediction-correction method. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[8]  Luís S. Pais,et al.  Modeling strategies for enantiomers separation by SMB chromatography , 1998 .

[9]  Chang-Ha Lee,et al.  Three-port operation in three-zone simulated moving bed chromatography. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  Wang Shuqing Application of Particle Swarm Optimization in Process of Non-linear Simulated Moving Bed Chromatographic Fractionation , 2006 .

[11]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[12]  Saman K. Halgamuge,et al.  Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Phillip C. Wankat,et al.  Two-Zone SMB/Chromatography for Center-Cut Separation from Ternary Mixtures: Linear Isotherm Systems , 2006 .

[14]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Optimal design of multicomponent countercurrent adsorption separation processes involving nonlinear equilibria , 1989 .

[15]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1998 .

[16]  O. Weck,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION AND THE GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2005 .

[17]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Two-level optimization of an existing SMB for p-xylene separation , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[18]  Alain Vande Wouwer,et al.  Optimization of VARICOL SMB processes using hybrid modeling and nonlinear programming , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[19]  E. Wilson Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1976 .

[20]  T.G. Habetler,et al.  Comparison of Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm in the design of permanent magnet motors , 2009, 2009 IEEE 6th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference.

[21]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Development of an optimal operation strategy in a sequential batch reactor (SBR) through mixed-integer particle swarm dynamic optimization (PSO) , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[22]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Tracking and optimizing dynamic systems with particle swarms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[23]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Instrumental aspects of Simulated Moving Bed chromatography. , 2015, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  Yuhui Shi,et al.  Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[25]  Hans Bock,et al.  Efficient optimization of simulated moving bed processes , 2007 .

[26]  A. K. Ray,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of SMB and varicol process for chiral separation , 2002 .

[27]  Olivier Ludemann-Hombourger,et al.  The “VARICOL” Process: A New Multicolumn Continuous Chromatographic Process , 2000 .