Decentring the Creative Self: How Others Make Creativity Possible in Creative Professional Fields

Since its inception, the psychology of creativity has been concerned primarily with the study of individual creators. In contrast, this research is dedicated to an exploration of (a) who has a significant impact on a creative professional's activity and (b) what the contribution is that others make to creative outcomes. The research included interviews with 60 professionals working in science and creative industries in France. The following categories of others emerged: family and friends, peers and students, clients and funders, critics and gatekeepers, and the general public – and they were related to themes depicting the interaction between these different others and the creator. Findings reveal both similarities and differences across the five domains in terms of the specific contribution of others to the creative process. Social interactions play a key formative, regulatory, motivational and informational role in relation to creative work. From ‘internalized’ to ‘distant’, other people are an integral part of the equation of creativity calling for a de‐centring of the creative self and its re‐centring in a social space of actions and interactions.

[1]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity , 2014 .

[2]  Marion Botella,et al.  Creativity as action: findings from five creative domains , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Alex Gillespie,et al.  Position exchange: The social development of agency , 2012 .

[4]  V. Glăveanu,et al.  Creativity As Cultural Participation , 2011 .

[5]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Group Creativity and Innovation: A Motivated Information Processing Perspective , 2011 .

[6]  Lars Löfqvist.  Product and Process Novelty in Small Companies' Design Processes , 2010 .

[7]  V. Glăveanu.  Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology , 2010 .

[8]  Bridget Conor.  'Everybody's a writer': Theorizing screenwriting as creative labour , 2010 .

[9]  E. N. Redvall.  Scriptwriting as a creative, collaborative learning process of problem finding and problem solving , 2009 .

[10]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[11]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making , 2008, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  Patricia D. Stokes,et al.  Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty. , 2007 .

[13]  R. Collins,et al.  The Creativity of Intellectual Networks and the Struggle over Attention Space , 2007 .

[14]  David Buckingham,et al.  The rhetorics of creativity: a review of the literature , 2006 .

[15]  S. Jovchelovitch.  Knowledge in context : representations, community and culture (author summary) , 2006 .

[16]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The Sources of Novelty: A Cultural and Systemic View of Distributed Creativity , 2006 .

[17]  H. Gruber,et al.  The Creative Person as a Whole , 2005 .

[18]  Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. , 2003 .

[19]  I. Marková.  Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. , 2003 .

[20]  B. Rogoff.  The Cultural Nature of Human Development , 2003 .

[21]  Aline Chevalier,et al.  Web site designs: Influences of designer's expertise and design constraints , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Sharon Bailin.  CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[23]  Jennifer Attride-Stirling.  Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research , 2001 .

[24]  G. Gaskell,et al.  Individual and Group Interviewing , 2000 .

[25]  R. Weiner.  Creativity and Beyond: Cultures, Values, and Change , 2000 .

[26]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Scientific Study of Expert Levels of Performance: general implications for optimal learning and creativity 1 , 1998 .

[27]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[28]  John Baer.  The Case for Domain Specificity of Creativity , 1998 .

[29]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[30]  M. Kaschub.  Exercising the Musical Imagination , 1997 .

[31]  M. Freeman.  Finding the Muse: A Sociopsychological Inquiry into the Conditions of Artistic Creativity , 1994 .

[32]  T. Rickards.  Talking point: Creativity and freedom: the fallacy of unconstrained action , 1993 .

[33]  Deborah Ellermeyer.  Enhancing Creativity through Play: A Discussion of Parental and Environmental Factors. , 1993 .

[34]  H. Gardner.  Creating minds: an anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of freud , 1993 .

[35]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[36]  D. Simonton,et al.  Sociocultural context of individual creativity: a transhistorical time-series analysis. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  A. Robustov,et al.  In creative collaboration , 1972 .

[38]  Sigmund Freud,et al.  Leonardo Da Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood , 1965 .

[39]  R. J. B..  The Child's Conception of the World , 1929, Nature.