The next frontier of the anaerobic digestion microbiome: From ecology to process control
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] U. Ijaz,et al. Microbial community redundancy in anaerobic digestion drives process recovery after salinity exposure. , 2017, Water research.
[2] Willy Verstraete,et al. How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology. , 2008, Environmental microbiology.
[3] W. Verstraete,et al. A time-course analysis of four full-scale anaerobic digesters in relation to the dynamics of change of their microbial communities. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[4] F. Bengelsdorf,et al. Functionally redundant but dissimilar microbial communities within biogas reactors treating maize silage in co-fermentation with sugar beet silage , 2015, Microbial biotechnology.
[5] M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al. Anaerobic digestion without biogas? , 2015, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology.
[6] A. Shade. Diversity is the question, not the answer , 2016, The ISME Journal.
[7] T. Bouchez,et al. Community shifts within anaerobic digestion microbiota facing phenol inhibition: Towards early warning microbial indicators? , 2016, Water research.
[8] Didier L. Baho,et al. Fundamentals of Microbial Community Resistance and Resilience , 2012, Front. Microbio..
[9] Christin Koch,et al. Flow cytometric quantification, sorting and sequencing of methanogenic archaea based on F420 autofluorescence , 2017, Microbial Cell Factories.
[10] Nicolae Scarlat,et al. Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe , 2018, Renewable Energy.
[11] I. Zhulin. Databases for Microbiologists , 2015, Journal of bacteriology.
[12] Katherine H. Huang,et al. A framework for human microbiome research , 2012, Nature.
[13] S. Allison,et al. Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] J. Klang,et al. Marker microbiome clusters are determined by operational parameters and specific key taxa combinations in anaerobic digestion. , 2018, Bioresource technology.
[15] L. T. Angenent,et al. Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[16] T. May,et al. Online monitoring of stable carbon isotopes of methane in anaerobic digestion as a new tool for early warning of process instability. , 2015, Bioresource technology.
[17] Zhongtang Yu,et al. A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. , 2011, Bioresource technology.
[18] R. Schmitz,et al. Evaluation of 16S rRNA Gene Primer Pairs for Monitoring Microbial Community Structures Showed High Reproducibility within and Low Comparability between Datasets Generated with Multiple Archaeal and Bacterial Primer Pairs , 2016, Front. Microbiol..
[19] B. Munk,et al. DNA and RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR-Based Assays for Biogas Biocenoses in an Interlaboratory Comparison , 2016, Bioengineering.
[20] Rick L. Stevens,et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity , 2017, Nature.
[21] U. Ijaz,et al. The active microbial community more accurately reflects the anaerobic digestion process: 16S rRNA (gene) sequencing as a predictive tool , 2018, Microbiome.
[22] Kim H. Esbensen,et al. Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: A review perspective , 2011 .
[23] Per Halkjær Nielsen,et al. MiDAS 2.0: an ecosystem-specific taxonomy and online database for the organisms of wastewater treatment systems expanded for anaerobic digester groups , 2017, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.
[24] M. Nierychlo,et al. Species-level microbiome composition of activated sludge - introducing the MiDAS 3 ecosystem-specific reference database and taxonomy , 2019, bioRxiv.
[25] H. Swerdlow,et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers , 2012, BMC Genomics.
[26] Jun-Wei Lim,et al. Monitoring of microbial communities in anaerobic digestion sludge for biogas optimisation. , 2018, Waste management.
[27] Paul J. McMurdie,et al. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis , 2017, The ISME Journal.
[28] J. Choo,et al. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[29] P. Wilmes,et al. A year of monitoring 20 mesophilic full-scale bioreactors reveals the existence of stable but different core microbiomes in bio-waste and wastewater anaerobic digestion systems , 2018, Biotechnology for Biofuels.
[30] Perry L. McCarty,et al. One hundred years of anaerobic treatment , 1982 .
[31] Aaron R Quinlan,et al. A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the MinION™ portable single-molecule nanopore sequencer , 2014, GigaScience.
[32] Willy Verstraete,et al. Co-digestion of molasses or kitchen waste with high-rate activated sludge results in a diverse microbial community with stable methane production. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.
[33] W. Verstraete,et al. Early warning indicators for process failure due to organic overloading by rapeseed oil in one-stage continuously stirred tank reactor, sewage sludge and waste digesters. , 2012, Bioresource technology.
[34] J. Baeyens,et al. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge , 2008 .
[35] Anne-Claude Romain,et al. Evaluation of an electronic nose for the early detection of organic overload of anaerobic digesters , 2012, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.
[36] Dalia Streimikiene,et al. Renewable Energy in the Electricity Sector and GDP per Capita in the European Union , 2019, Energies.
[37] Anders F. Andersson,et al. Analysing Microbial Community Composition through Amplicon Sequencing: From Sampling to Hypothesis Testing , 2017, Front. Microbiol..
[38] Xuya Peng,et al. Early warning indicators for monitoring the process failure of anaerobic digestion system of food waste. , 2014, Bioresource technology.
[39] Joonyeob Lee,et al. Bacteria and archaea communities in full-scale thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digesters treating food wastewater: Key process parameters and microbial indicators of process instability. , 2017, Bioresource technology.
[40] Willy Verstraete,et al. Perspectives for microbial community composition in anaerobic digestion: from abundance and activity to connectivity. , 2016, Environmental microbiology.
[41] Yuanpeng Wang,et al. The core populations and co-occurrence patterns of prokaryotic communities in household biogas digesters , 2015, Biotechnology for Biofuels.
[42] Alessandro Bozzon,et al. Automatic Processing of User-Generated Content for the Description of Energy-Consuming Activities at Individual and Group Level , 2018, Energies.
[43] Ana Carolina Campi-Azevedo,et al. FC-TRIPLEX Chagas/Leish IgG1: A Multiplexed Flow Cytometry Method for Differential Serological Diagnosis of Chagas Disease and Leishmaniasis , 2015, PloS one.
[44] S. Kleinsteuber,et al. A T-RFLP database for the rapid profiling of methanogenic communities in anaerobic digesters. , 2016, Anaerobe.
[45] Irini Angelidaki,et al. Deeper insight into the structure of the anaerobic digestion microbial community; the biogas microbiome database is expanded with 157 new genomes. , 2016, Bioresource technology.
[46] A. Clooney,et al. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform , 2016, BMC Microbiology.
[47] Marta Carballa,et al. Key microbial communities steering the functioning of anaerobic digesters during hydraulic and organic overloading shocks. , 2015, Bioresource technology.
[48] N. Boon,et al. Online flow cytometric monitoring of microbial water quality in a full-scale water treatment plant , 2018, npj Clean Water.
[49] L. T. Angenent,et al. Substrate type drives variation in reactor microbiomes of anaerobic digesters. , 2014, Bioresource technology.
[50] S. Nahnsen,et al. Interpretations of microbial community studies are biased by the selected 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing pipeline , 2019, bioRxiv.
[51] L. T. Angenent,et al. Redundancy in Anaerobic Digestion Microbiomes during Disturbances by the Antibiotic Monensin , 2018, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[52] K. Rabaey,et al. Microbial protein production from methane via electrochemical biogas upgrading , 2020 .
[53] Alastair J Ward,et al. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. , 2008, Bioresource technology.
[54] Manuel Porcar,et al. The long journey towards standards for engineering biosystems , 2020, EMBO reports.
[55] Aaron Marc Saunders,et al. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism is an “old school” reliable technique for swift microbial community screening in anaerobic digestion , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[56] E. Pelletier,et al. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge , 2009, The ISME Journal.
[57] T. J. Britz,et al. PCR-based DGGE fingerprinting and identification of methanogens detected in three different types of UASB granules. , 2006, Systematic and applied microbiology.
[58] Nico Boon,et al. The full-scale anaerobic digestion microbiome is represented by specific marker populations. , 2016, Water research.
[59] Mads Albertsen,et al. Back to Basics – The Influence of DNA Extraction and Primer Choice on Phylogenetic Analysis of Activated Sludge Communities , 2015, PloS one.
[60] Abhishek S. Dhoble,et al. A novel high-throughput multi-parameter flow cytometry based method for monitoring and rapid characterization of microbiome dynamics in anaerobic systems. , 2016, Bioresource technology.
[61] Genovaitė Liobikienė,et al. Scale, composition, and technique effects through which the economic growth, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and trade affect greenhouse gas emissions , 2019, Renewable Energy.
[62] V. Galvita,et al. Upgrading the value of anaerobic digestion via chemical production from grid injected biomethane , 2018 .
[63] Dolf Gielen,et al. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.
[64] I. Smets,et al. Cofactor F430 as a biomarker for methanogenic activity: application to an anaerobic bioreactor system , 2018, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.
[65] Aviaja Anna Hansen,et al. MiDAS: the field guide to the microbes of activated sludge , 2015, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.