Risk factors for relapse in stage I non‐seminomatous germ‐cell tumors: Preliminary results of the German multicenter trial

Risk factor analysis to identify low‐risk patients for occult metastatic disease (vascular invasion, percentage embryonal carcinoma, MIB‐I proliferation rate) yields reliable results if performed by experts. A correct prediction is possible at the 90% level. Similar accuracy, however, may be achieved if the computed tomography (CT) staging is optimized and the evaluation performed by an experienced investigator. The combination of both methods (biological risk factor analysis and CT staging) may virtually exclude the risk of relapse in a limited number of patients. However, so far, no risk factor that is able to reliably predict occult metastatic disease or relapse in clinical stage I patients has been identified in prospective trials. The preliminary results of the current German Multicenter Trial suggest an inferior value of prediction for low‐risk patients if risk factor analyis and/or CT staging is performed in non‐specialized centers. Int. J. Cancer 83:828–830, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D. Böhlen,et al.  Long-term results following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinical stage I testicular nonseminomatous malignant germ cell tumors with high risk factors. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[2]  P. Albers,et al.  Positron emission tomography in the clinical staging of patients with Stage I and II testicular germ cell tumors. , 1999, Urology.

[3]  F. Mostofi,et al.  Prognostic risk factors that identify patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at low risk and high risk for metastasis , 1998, Cancer.

[4]  D. Ondruš,et al.  Prognostic Factors in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous GermCell Testicular Tumors: Rationale for Different Risk-Adapted Treatment , 1998, European Urology.

[5]  P. Albers,et al.  Identification of clinical stage A nonseminomatous testis cancer patients at extremely low risk for metastatic disease: a combined approach using quantitive immunohistochemical, histopathologic, and radiologic assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  C. Begg,et al.  CT detection of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in patients with clinical stage I testicular nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: assessment of size and distribution criteria. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  O. Dahl,et al.  Risk-adapted treatment of clinical stage 1 non-seminoma testis cancer. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[8]  R. Fimmers,et al.  MIB‐1 immunohistochemistry in clinical Stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors predicts patients at low risk for metastasis , 1997 .

[9]  P. Albers,et al.  Tumor proliferative activity is predictive of pathological stage in clinical stage A nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[10]  K. Kopecky,et al.  Improved accuracy of computerized tomography based clinical staging in low stage nonseminomatous germ cell cancer using size criteria of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[11]  P. Albers,et al.  Predictive parameters of biologic behavior of early stage nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors , 1994, Cancer.

[12]  J. Moul,et al.  Percentage of embryonal carcinoma and of vascular invasion predicts pathological stage in clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular cancer. , 1994, Cancer research.

[13]  E. Oldfield,et al.  Heterogeneity of subcellular localization of p53 protein in human glioblastomas. , 1994, Cancer research.

[14]  A. Horwich,et al.  Medical Research Council prospective study of surveillance for stage I testicular teratoma. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumors Working Party. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.