Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Phosphorylated KID Post-Translational Modification

Background Kinase-inducible domain (KID) as transcriptional activator can stimulate target gene expression in signal transduction by associating with KID interacting domain (KIX). NMR spectra suggest that apo-KID is an unstructured protein. After post-translational modification by phosphorylation, KID undergoes a transition from disordered to well folded protein upon binding to KIX. However, the mechanism of folding coupled to binding is poorly understood. Methodology To get an insight into the mechanism, we have performed ten trajectories of explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) for both bound and apo phosphorylated KID (pKID). Ten MD simulations are sufficient to capture the average properties in the protein folding and unfolding. Conclusions Room-temperature MD simulations suggest that pKID becomes more rigid and stable upon the KIX-binding. Kinetic analysis of high-temperature MD simulations shows that bound pKID and apo-pKID unfold via a three-state and a two-state process, respectively. Both kinetics and free energy landscape analyses indicate that bound pKID folds in the order of KIX access, initiation of pKID tertiary folding, folding of helix αB, folding of helix αA, completion of pKID tertiary folding, and finalization of pKID-KIX binding. Our data show that the folding pathways of apo-pKID are different from the bound state: the foldings of helices αA and αB are swapped. Here we also show that Asn139, Asp140 and Leu141 with large Φ-values are key residues in the folding of bound pKID. Our results are in good agreement with NMR experimental observations and provide significant insight into the general mechanisms of binding induced protein folding and other conformational adjustment in post-translational modification.

[1]  David Baker Metastable states and folding free energy barriers , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[2]  Peter E Wright,et al.  Solution Structure of the KIX Domain of CBP Bound to the Transactivation Domain of CREB: A Model for Activator:Coactivator Interactions , 1997, Cell.

[3]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[4]  T. Oas,et al.  Linked folding and anion binding of the Bacillus subtilis ribonuclease P protein. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[5]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structure of the transition state for folding of a protein derived from experiment and simulation. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Fly-casting in protein-DNA binding: frustration between protein folding and electrostatics facilitates target recognition. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  N. Sharma,et al.  The Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Protein Confers CBP/p300 Recruitment and Transcriptional Activation Properties to Phosphorylated CREB , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[8]  Hai-Feng Chen Aggregation mechanism investigation of the GIFQINS cross-beta amyloid fibril , 2009, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[9]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein folding and unfolding in microseconds to nanoseconds by experiment and simulation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[11]  Masatoshi Hagiwara,et al.  Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP , 1993, Nature.

[12]  Peter E Wright,et al.  Roles of Phosphorylation and Helix Propensity in the Binding of the KIX Domain of CREB-binding Protein by Constitutive (c-Myb) and Inducible (CREB) Activators* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  K. Lumb,et al.  Structurally distinct modes of recognition of the KIX domain of CBP by Jun and CREB. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[14]  S. Takada,et al.  Dynamic energy landscape view of coupled binding and protein conformational change: Induced-fit versus population-shift mechanisms , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.21302 References , 2001 .

[16]  Ryan Day,et al.  Direct observation of microscopic reversibility in single-molecule protein folding. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[18]  A. Fersht,et al.  Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein-folding mechanisms: contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Stephen J. Moran,et al.  The folding pathway of spectrin R17 from experiment and simulation: using experimentally validated MD simulations to characterize States hinted at by experiment. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[21]  Gregory A.Petsko and Dagmar Ringe Protein structure and function , 2003 .

[22]  H. Shih,et al.  Control of cAMP-regulated enhancers by the viral transactivator Tax through CREB and the co-activator CBP , 1996, Nature.

[23]  M Wilmanns,et al.  Solvation in protein folding analysis: combination of theoretical and experimental approaches. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Ryan Day,et al.  Ensemble versus single-molecule protein unfolding. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. Tompa,et al.  Phosphorylation‐induced transient intrinsic structure in the kinase‐inducible domain of CREB facilitates its recognition by the KIX domain of CBP , 2006, Proteins.

[29]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Insight into ribonuclease A domain swapping by molecular dynamics unfolding simulations. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[30]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Natalie de Souza From structure to function , 2007, Nature Methods.

[32]  Hai-Feng Chen,et al.  Mechanism of Coupled Folding and Binding in the siRNA-PAZ Complex. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[33]  A Caflisch,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of protein denaturation: solvation of the hydrophobic cores and secondary structure of barnase. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  V. Daggett,et al.  Sensitivity of the folding/unfolding transition state ensemble of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 to changes in temperature and solvent , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Structured disorder and conformational selection , 2001, Proteins.

[36]  T. Oas,et al.  Ligation-state hydrogen exchange: coupled binding and folding equilibria in ribonuclease P protein. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[37]  J M Thornton,et al.  LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[38]  D. Boehr,et al.  How Do Proteins Interact? , 2008, Science.

[39]  S. Akanuma,et al.  A detailed unfolding pathway of a (β/α)8‐barrel protein as studied by molecular dynamics simulations , 2004 .

[40]  T. Weikl,et al.  Selected‐fit versus induced‐fit protein binding: Kinetic differences and mutational analysis , 2008, Proteins.

[41]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[42]  R. Evans,et al.  Phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133 induces complex formation with CREB-binding protein via a direct mechanism , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[43]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declara... , 2008 .

[44]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Antibody Multispecificity Mediated by Conformational Diversity , 2003, Science.

[45]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Unifying features in protein-folding mechanisms , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  A. Li,et al.  Characterization of the transition state of protein unfolding by use of molecular dynamics: chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein Folding and Unfolding at Atomic Resolution , 2002, Cell.

[48]  B. Karki,et al.  Mechanism of β-purothionin antimicrobial peptide inhibition by metal ions: Molecular dynamics simulation study , 2006 .

[49]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Dimerization of the p53 oligomerization domain: identification of a folding nucleus by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  P E Wright,et al.  Conformational preferences in the Ser133‐phosphorylated and non‐phosphorylated forms of the kinase inducible transactivation domain of CREB , 1998, FEBS letters.

[51]  A Caflisch,et al.  Role of native topology investigated by multiple unfolding simulations of four SH3 domains. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  V S Pande,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of unfolding and refolding of a beta-hairpin fragment of protein G. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  David A. C. Beck,et al.  Microscopic reversibility of protein folding in molecular dynamics simulations of the engrailed homeodomain. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[54]  A Caflisch,et al.  Acid and thermal denaturation of barnase investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  Ray Luo,et al.  Binding induced folding in p53-MDM2 complex. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[56]  M Levitt,et al.  Hierarchy of structure loss in MD simulations of src SH3 domain unfolding. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  H. Dyson,et al.  Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein , 2007, Nature.

[58]  M. Karplus,et al.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state , 2001, Nature.

[59]  Jörg Gsponer,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  A. Fersht,et al.  Synergy between simulation and experiment in describing the energy landscape of protein folding. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  A. Fersht,et al.  Searching for multiple folding pathways of a nearly symmetrical protein: temperature dependent phi-value analysis of the B domain of protein A. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.