Prognostic value of coronary magnetic resonance angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

[1]  D. Berman,et al.  Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Yeung Yam,et al.  Incremental Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease Using CONFIRM: COroNary Computed Tomography Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  Masaaki Ito,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T unenhanced whole-heart coronary MR angiography performed with 32-channel cardiac coils: initial single-center experience. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  H. Sakuma Coronary CT versus MR angiography: the role of MR angiography. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  D. Berman,et al.  Prevalence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Adverse Events Among Symptomatic Patients With Coronary Artery Calcification Scores of Zero Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Results From the CONFIRM ( Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes : An Internationa , 2011 .

[6]  K. Katahira,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[10]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Anne-Catherine Pouleur,et al.  Direct Comparison of Whole-Heart Navigator-Gated Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography and 40- and 64-Slice Multidetector Row Computed Tomography to Detect the Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients Scheduled for Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease , 2008, European Radiology.

[13]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Gilard,et al.  Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings: a prospective management outcome study. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Kan Takeda,et al.  Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Finn,et al.  Cardiac MR imaging: state of the technology. , 2006, Radiology.

[18]  P. Wolf,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2006, Circulation.

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. , 2006, American heart journal.

[20]  Kay Nehrke,et al.  Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. , 2005, European heart journal.

[21]  M. Van Cauteren,et al.  Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography. , 2005, Radiology.

[22]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Free-breathing 3D steady-state free precession coronary MR angiography with radial k-space sampling: comparison with cartesian k-space sampling and cartesian gradient-echo coronary MR angiography--pilot study. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  C. Claussen,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Alastair J. Martin,et al.  Whole‐heart steady‐state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  John P Ridgway,et al.  Three-dimensional coronary MR angiography performed with subject-specific cardiac acquisition windows and motion-adapted respiratory gating. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  W. Santamore,et al.  Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? , 1988, Circulation.

[27]  V. Fuster,et al.  Angiographic evolution of coronary artery morphology in unstable angina. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.