Design and validation of a structural health monitoring system for aeronautical structures.

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is an area where the main objective is the verification of the state or the health of the structures in order to ensure proper performance and maintenance cost savings using a sensor network attached to the structure, continuous monitoring and algorithms. Different benefits are derived from the implementation of SHM, some of them are: knowledge about the behavior of the structure under different loads and different environmental changes, knowledge of the current state in order to verify the integrity of the structure and determine whether a structure can work properly or whether it needs to be maintained or replaced and, therefore, to reduce maintenance costs. The paradigm of damage identification (comparison between the data collected from the structure without damages and the current structure in orderto determine if there are any changes) can be tackled as a pattern recognition problem. Some statistical techniques as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) or Independent Component Analysis (ICA) are very useful for this purpose because they allow obtaining the most relevant information from a large amount of variables. This thesis uses an active piezoelectric system to develop statistical data driven approaches for the detection, localization and classification of damages in structures. This active piezoelectric system is permanently attached to the surface of the structure under test in order to apply vibrational excitations and sensing the dynamical responses propagated through the structure at different points. As pattern recognition technique, PCA is used to perform the main task of the proposed methodology: to build a base-line model of the structure without damage and subsequentlyto compare the data from the current structure (under test) with this model. Moreover, different damage indices are calculated to detect abnormalities in the structure under test. Besides, the localization of the damage can be determined by means of the contribution of each sensor to each index. This contribution is calculated by several different methods and their comparison is performed. To classify different damages, the damage detection methodology is extended using a Self-Organizing Map (SOM), which is properly trained and validated to build a pattern baseline model using projections of the data onto the PCAmodel and damage detection indices. This baseline is further used as a reference for blind diagnosis tests of structures. Additionally, PCA is replaced by ICAas pattern recognition technique. A comparison between the two methodologies is performed highlighting advantages and disadvantages. In order to study the performance of the damage classification methodology under different scenarios, the methodology is tested using data from a structure under several different temperatures. The methodologies developed in this work are tested and validated using different structures, in particular an aircraft turbine blade, an aircraft wing skeleton, an aircraft fuselage,some aluminium plates and some composite matarials plates.

[1]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  A FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR PULSED EDDY CURRENT NDT , 2003 .

[2]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Detection and quantification of non-linear structural behavior using principal component analysis , 2012 .

[3]  Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos,et al.  Active piezoelectric system using PCA , 2010 .

[4]  Hideo Kobayashi,et al.  An unsupervised statistical damage detection method for structural health monitoring (applied to detection of delamination of a composite beam) , 2004 .

[5]  Chenyang Lu,et al.  A Holistic Approach to Decentralized Structural Damage Localization Using Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 Real-Time Systems Symposium.

[6]  Ning Hu,et al.  Structural damage identification using piezoelectric sensors , 2002 .

[7]  R. Ganguli A Fuzzy Logic System for Ground Based Structural Health Monitoring of a Helicopter Rotor Using Modal Data , 2001 .

[8]  Josep Vehí,et al.  A hybrid approach of knowledge-based reasoning for structural assessment , 2005 .

[9]  H. T. Hahn,et al.  An Artificial Neural Network for Low-Energy Impact Monitoring , 1994 .

[10]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Adaptive Structures for Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[11]  P. De Boe,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS , 2004 .

[12]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Statistical model updating and validation applied to nonlinear transient structural dynamics , 2000 .

[13]  Abdulhamit Subasi,et al.  Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for epileptic seizure detection using wavelet feature extraction , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  Mahmoud Z. Iskandarani,et al.  Application of neural networks to damage classification in composite structures , 2010 .

[15]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Statistical Time Series Methods for Structural Health Monitoring ∗ (Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, John Wiley & Sons: Contribution ID shm044) , 2008 .

[16]  A. Baker,et al.  Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures , 2004 .

[17]  K. Law,et al.  Statistical Damage Detection Using Time Series Analysis on a Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Problem , 2003 .

[18]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Statistical Damage Classification Under Changing Environmental and Operational Conditions , 2002 .

[19]  Theodoros H. Loutas,et al.  Intelligent health monitoring of aerospace composite structures based on dynamic strain measurements , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[21]  Keith Worden,et al.  Impact Location and Quantification on a Composite Panel using Neural Networks and a Genetic Algorithm , 2000 .

[22]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Application of load-dependent Ritz vectors to Bayesian probabilistic damage detection , 2000 .

[23]  Bo Han,et al.  Structural Damage Detection by Integrating Independent Component Analysis and Support Vector Machine , 2005, ADMA.

[24]  Keith Worden,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Material Typical of Wind Turbine Blades by Novelty Detection on Vibration Response , 2012 .

[25]  Keith Worden,et al.  Fail-safe sensor distributions for impact detection in composite materials , 2000 .

[26]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Dispersion Curves in Guided Wave Testing , 2003 .

[27]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[28]  Michael P. Windham,et al.  Information and classification: Concepts, methods and applications , 1995 .

[29]  Mehmet Imregun,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MEASURED FRF DATA REDUCED VIA PRINCIPAL COMPONENT PROJECTION , 2001 .

[30]  J. A. Brandon,et al.  Classification of acoustic emission signatures using a self-organization neural network , 1999 .

[31]  Carlos Alberto,et al.  Structural health monitoring methodology for simply supported bridges: numerical implementation , 2007 .

[32]  Keith Worden,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[33]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis , 1994 .

[34]  P. Cawley,et al.  The interaction of Lamb waves with defects , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Reconstruction-Based Fault Identification Using a Combined Index , 2001 .

[36]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  Principal Component Analysis of a Piezosensor Array for Damage Localization , 2003 .

[37]  K. Worden,et al.  Visualisation and Dimension Reduction of Acoustic Emission Data for Damage Detection , 1999 .

[38]  J M W Brownjohn,et al.  Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Comparing alternative approaches for multivariate statistical analysis of batch process data , 1999 .

[40]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.

[41]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[42]  Keith Worden,et al.  Impact Damage Detection in Aircraft Composites Using Knowledge-based Reasoning , 2008 .

[43]  Dehuai Zeng Advances in Information Technology and Industry Applications , 2012 .

[44]  M. Ouladsine,et al.  Fault localization using principal component analysis based on a new contribution to the squared prediction error , 2008, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[45]  Spilios D Fassois,et al.  Time-series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[46]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Passive damage detection in composite laminates with integrated sensing networks , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[47]  J N Kudva,et al.  Damage detection in smart structures using neural networks and finite-element analyses , 1992 .

[48]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures , 2011 .

[49]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Locating and quantifying structure damage using spatial wavelet packet signature , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[50]  Alison B. Flatau,et al.  Review Paper: Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure , 2003 .

[51]  J.W. LEE,et al.  HEALTH-MONITORING METHOD FOR BRIDGES UNDER ORDINARY TRAFFIC LOADINGS , 2002 .

[52]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A Coupled Approach to Developing Damage Prognosis Solutions , 2003 .

[53]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Comparison of several methods for damage localization using indices and contributions based on PCA , 2011 .

[54]  Kent A. Murphy,et al.  Fiber optic impact detection and location system embedded in a composite material , 1993, Other Conferences.

[55]  B. Culshaw,et al.  Acousto-ultrasonic sensing using fiber Bragg gratings , 2003 .

[56]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Multiway Partial Least Square (MPLS) to estimate impact localization in structures , 2009 .

[57]  Ugo Galvanetto,et al.  Numerical investigation of a new damage detection method based on proper orthogonal decomposition , 2007 .

[58]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A statistical pattern recognition paradigm for structural health monitoring , 2004 .

[59]  Christian Boller,et al.  Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures , 2003 .

[60]  W. Staszewski,et al.  Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure , 2003 .

[61]  Elif Derya Übeyli Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system employing wavelet coefficients for detection of ophthalmic arterial disorders , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[62]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Applying the LANL Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm for Structural Health Monitoring to Data from a Surface-Effect Fast Patrol Boat , 2001 .

[63]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[64]  C. Fritzen,et al.  A viscoelastic plate theory for the fast modelling of Lamb wave solutions in NDT/SHM applications , 2011 .

[65]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Unified Analysis of Diagnosis Methods for Process Monitoring , 2009 .

[66]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Curvature and Fuzzy Logic , 2009 .

[67]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Structural integrity monitoring , 1997 .

[68]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Parameter Estimation of the Generalized Extreme Value Distribution for Structural Health Monitoring , 2005 .

[69]  D. C. Zimmerman,et al.  The effect of coding on genetic algorithm based structural damage detection , 1998 .

[70]  Wieslaw J. Staszewski,et al.  Advanced data pre-processing for damage identification based on pattern recognition , 2000, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[71]  James Hensman,et al.  Natural computing for mechanical systems research: A tutorial overview , 2011 .

[72]  Hong Hao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Detection of Structures by Genetic Algorithm , 2002 .

[73]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Integration of structural health monitoring and fatigue damage prognosis , 2012 .

[74]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[75]  Cecilia Surace,et al.  An application of Genetic Algorithms to identify damage in elastic structures , 1996 .

[76]  Boeing Helicopters,et al.  Impact Detection in Composite Skin Panels Using Piezoelectric Sensors , 1991 .

[77]  S. Wold,et al.  Multi‐way principal components‐and PLS‐analysis , 1987 .

[78]  Gérard Ballivy,et al.  Neural-network-based damage classification of bridge infrastructure using texture analysis , 2008 .

[79]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[80]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection , 2001 .

[81]  J. Rose Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media , 1999 .

[82]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  Structural health monitoring using piezoelectric impedance measurements , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[83]  Claus-Peter FRITZEN,et al.  Damage Detection and Classification in Pipework Using Acousto-Ultrasonics and Probabilistic Non-Linear Modelling , 2012 .

[84]  James S. Sirkis,et al.  Development of an impact detection technique using optical fiber sensors and neural networks , 1994, Smart Structures.

[85]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures , 1993 .

[86]  Nathalie Godin,et al.  Clustering of acoustic emission signals collected during tensile tests on unidirectional glass/polyester composite using supervised and unsupervised classifiers , 2004 .

[87]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[88]  Konstantinos Gryllias,et al.  Morphological processing of proper orthogonal modes for crack detection in beam structures , 2009 .

[89]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[90]  K. Worden,et al.  The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[91]  Claus-Peter Fritzen,et al.  Characterization and classification of modes in acoustic emission based on dispersion features and energy distribution analysis , 2012 .

[92]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  New passive defect detection technique , 2007 .

[93]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring , 2006 .

[94]  Libo Yuan,et al.  Strain monitoring in FRP laminates and concrete beams using FBG sensors , 2001 .

[95]  L. Ye,et al.  Functionalized composite structures for new generation airframes: a review , 2005 .

[96]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Reconstruction-based Contribution for Process Monitoring , 2008 .

[97]  Zengrong Wang,et al.  Autoregressive coefficients based Hotelling's T2 control chart for structural health monitoring , 2008 .

[98]  José Rodellar,et al.  Data-driven multivariate algorithms for damage detection and identification: Evaluation and comparison , 2014 .

[99]  Eric B. Flynn,et al.  Optimal Placement of Piezoelectric Actuators and Sensors for Detecting Damage in Plate Structures , 2010 .

[100]  Mohammad Azarbayejani Optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring (SHM) with a field application on a RC bridge , 2010 .

[101]  Charles R Farrar,et al.  Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[102]  Xinhua Xu,et al.  Enhanced chiller sensor fault detection, diagnosis and estimation using wavelet analysis and principal component analysis methods , 2008 .

[103]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques , 2001 .

[104]  Chun-Gon Kim,et al.  Strain Monitoring and Damage Detection of a Filament Wound Composite Pressure Tank Using Embedded Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors , 2005 .

[105]  Christian Boller,et al.  Impact Damage Detection in Composite Structures Using Passive Acousto-Ultrasonic Sensors , 2001 .

[106]  C. Bermes,et al.  Experimental characterization of material nonlinearity using Lamb waves , 2007 .

[107]  Amrita Kumar,et al.  Design of Integrated SHM System for Commercial Aircraft Applications , 2005 .

[108]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[109]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis , 2005 .

[110]  Arturo E. Schultz,et al.  Bridge Health Monitoring and Inspections – A Survey of Methods , 2009 .

[111]  Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos,et al.  Data-driven multiactuator piezoelectric system for structural damage localization , 2010 .

[112]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Cluster Connections: A visualization technique to reveal cluster boundaries in self-organizing maps , 1998 .

[113]  Jan Ming Ko,et al.  Fatigue analysis and life prediction of bridges with structural health monitoring data — Part I: methodology and strategy , 2001 .

[114]  Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos,et al.  Damage assessment in a stiffened composite panel using non-linear data-driven modelling and ultrasonic guided waves , 2013 .

[115]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Detection of Defects in a Thin Steel Plate Using Ultrasonic Guided Wave , 1998 .

[116]  Jung-Ryul Lee,et al.  Structural health monitoring for a wind turbine system: a review of damage detection methods , 2008 .

[117]  Q. Shan,et al.  Fuzzy techniques for impact locating and magnitude estimating , 2003 .

[118]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[119]  Jeffrey E. Mast,et al.  HERMES: a high-speed radar imaging system for inspection of bridge decks , 1996, Smart Structures.

[120]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Sensor validation using principal component analysis , 2005 .

[121]  Luis Eduardo Mujica Delgado,et al.  A review of impact damage detection in structures using strain data , 2010 .

[122]  Miguel Angel Torres-Arredondo,et al.  On the Application of Bayesian Analysis and Advanced Signal Processing Techniques for the Impact Monitoring of Smart Structures , 2011 .

[123]  Angelos Amditis,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for seismic evaluation of concrete buildings , 2010 .

[124]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases , 2005 .

[125]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Title : Structural damage identification using a Bayesian model selection framework , 2010 .

[126]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Health monitoring of Metsovo Bridge using ambient vibrations. , 2010 .

[127]  Bruno P. Leao,et al.  Aircraft flap and slat systems health monitoring using Statistical Process Control techniques , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[128]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment , 2008 .

[129]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[130]  Christian Boller,et al.  Identification of Life Cycle Cost Reductions in Structures With Self-Diagnostic Devices , 2000 .

[131]  Hong Hao,et al.  Neural Network Based Damage Detection Using a Substructure Technique , 2007 .

[132]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  SHM of wind turbine blades using piezoelectric active-sensors , 2010 .

[133]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A Bayesian experimental design approach to structural health monitoring , 2010 .

[134]  Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat,et al.  Approaches to analyse and interpret biological profile data , 2006 .

[135]  A. P. Adewuyi,et al.  VIBRATION-BASED STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING TECHNIQUE USING STATISTICAL FEATURES FROM STRAIN MEASUREMENTS , 2009 .

[136]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Structural health monitoring and damage assessment using a novel time series analysis methodology with sensor clustering , 2011 .

[137]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Methods for interpreting a self-organized map in data analysis , 1998, ESANN.

[138]  Cecilia Surace,et al.  Structural Damage Detection Based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition: Experimental Verification , 2008 .

[139]  L. A. Dobrzański,et al.  Application of neural networks to classification of internal damages in steels working in creep service , 2007 .

[140]  Mehdi Salehi,et al.  A Frequency Response Based Structural Damage Localization Method Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2011 .

[141]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[142]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Damage Identification using Soft-computing Techniques , 2003 .

[143]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring With Autoregressive Support Vector Machines , 2009 .

[144]  Mohammad Azarbayejani,et al.  A probabilistic approach for optimal sensor allocation in structural health monitoring , 2008 .

[145]  Futoshi Katsuki,et al.  Health monitoring of a railway bridge by fiber optic sensor (SOFO) , 2010 .

[146]  A. Kozyrev,et al.  Tunable transmission and harmonic generation in nonlinear metamaterials , 2008, 0805.0028.

[147]  A. Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  Damage Classification for Structural Health Monitoring Using Time-Frequency Feature Extraction and Continuous Hidden Markov Models , 2007, 2007 Conference Record of the Forty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[148]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Statistical Wavelet-Based Method for Structural Health Monitoring , 2004 .

[149]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I. Experiment , 1998 .

[150]  Yoshihiro NITTA,et al.  CONSISTING OF TWO STAGES WITH DIFERENT PURPOSES , 2002 .

[151]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Constrained independent component analysis and its application to machine fault diagnosis , 2011 .

[152]  Richard O. Claus,et al.  Location of impacts on composite panels by embedded fiber optic sensors and neural network processing , 1995, Smart Structures.

[153]  Amabili Garziera R Structural health monitoring techniques for historical buildings , 2007 .

[154]  Janette Louise Jaques,et al.  Using impact modulation to identify loose bolts in a satellite structure , 2011 .

[155]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Detection, localisation and identification of nonlinearities in structural dynamics , 2000 .

[156]  Armaghan Salehian,et al.  Identifying the Location of a Sudden Damage in Composite Laminates Using Wavelet Approach , 2003 .

[157]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Structural Damage Detection using Independent Component Analysis , 2004 .

[158]  Gehao Sheng,et al.  State inspection for transmission lines based on independent component analysis , 2009 .

[159]  Seamus D. Garvey,et al.  A COMBINED GENETIC AND EIGENSENSITIVITY ALGORITHM FOR THE LOCATION OF DAMAGE IN STRUCTURES , 1998 .

[160]  Esa Alhoniemi,et al.  SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5 , 2000 .

[161]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Piezoelectric Wafer Embedded Active Sensors for Aging Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring , 2002 .