Adults’ perception of native and nonnative vowels: Implications for the perceptual magnet effect
暂无分享,去创建一个
J E Flege | M. Sloane | J. Flege | E. Frieda | A. Walley | A C Walley | E M Frieda | M E Sloane | E. M. Frieda
[1] J. Hillenbrand,et al. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] J. Flege,et al. Native Speakers of Spanish Show Rate-Dependent Processing of English Stop Consonants , 1995, Phonetica.
[3] Richard Wright,et al. The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. , 1993 .
[4] J. L. Miller,et al. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[5] M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al. Crosslanguage Study of Vowel Perception , 1969, Language and speech.
[6] B. Ross,et al. Concepts and Categories , 1994 .
[7] Peter Ladefoged,et al. Elements of Acoustic Phonetics , 1962 .
[8] A G Samuel,et al. Phonetic prototypes , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.
[9] E. Rosch. Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[10] P. Kuhl,et al. Categorization of Speech by Infants: Support for Speech-Sound Prototypes. , 1989 .
[11] J. L. Miller,et al. Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] F. Guenther,et al. The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] K. Stevens,et al. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.
[14] P Iverson,et al. Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Patricia K. Kuhl,et al. Innate Predispositions and the Effects of Experience in Speech Perception: The Native Language Magnet Theory , 1993 .
[16] G. E. Peterson,et al. Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .
[17] P. Kuhl. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[18] E Uusipaikka,et al. Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[20] J. Sussman,et al. Further tests of the "perceptual magnet effect" in the perception of [i]: identification and change/no-change discrimination. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] D B Pisoni,et al. On prototypes and phonetic categories: a critical assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech perception. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] Patricia K. Kohl. Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: implications for theories of developmental speech perception , 1993 .
[23] P. Kuhl,et al. Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Detection of linear frequency glides as a function of frequency and duration , 1988 .
[25] Peter W. Jusczyk,et al. Some reflections on developmental changes in speech perception and production , 1993 .
[26] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[27] Dennis H. Klatt,et al. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .
[28] J. Flanagan. A Difference Limen for Vowel Formant Frequency , 1955 .