Directing ultrasound at the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) of human teeth: I. Asymmetry of ultrasonic path lengths.

The diagnosis of degenerative changes in human teeth is of general interest because early detections can avoid greater health problems and further weakening effects. Since the wear of teeth determines their stability and lifetime in relation to the physiological load, an ultrasonic survey of any dimensional changes of the enamel layer and especially of the dentin wall thickness may be very helpful. However, an ultrasonographic diagnosis requires first to determine the anisotropic human tooth properties at clinically relevant locations and to simulate wave propagation phenomena in inhomogeneous tooth models with proper dimensions. The first article of a series that provides modular data of mineralized tissues in human teeth at the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) deals with an ultrasonic method for measuring the asymmetry of dimensional characteristics of extracted human teeth and their ultrasonic path lengths (UPL). Heavily attenuating tooth halves were investigated with respect to the symmetry of normal and inclined oppositely directed radial ultrasonic paths. The measured UPLs ranged from 1.2 mm to 4.4 mm. The relative difference in inclined UPLs between the left and the right tooth halves reaches almost 30%. This reveals a large asymmetry. The mean difference of angles that represent fastest path lengths was 2.2+/-8.1 degrees, which indicates large asymmetry and anisotropy. Several aspects, which are required for a proper integration of asymmetric data into models designed for medical element engineering and simulation (MEES), are discussed.

[1]  Reiko T. Kono,et al.  A three-dimensional analysis of enamel distribution patterns in human permanent first molars. , 2002, Archives of oral biology.

[2]  J. Tienari,et al.  Tooth eruption symmetry in functional lateralities. , 2001, Archives of oral biology.

[3]  Drai,et al.  Elaboration of some signal processing algorithms in ultrasonic techniques: application to materials NDT , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[4]  S Lees,et al.  Urasonic pulse-echo measurements in teeth. , 1969, Archives of oral biology.

[5]  P P Delsanto,et al.  Modeling the propagation of ultrasonic waves in the interface region between two bonded elements. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[6]  S Lees,et al.  Anisotropy in hard dental tissues. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Christoph John,et al.  The corono-apically varying ultrasonic velocity in human hard dental tissues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S. Lees,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of dental enamel demineralization. , 1973, Ultrasonics.

[9]  R. S. Schechter,et al.  Real-Time Parallel Computation and Visualization of Ultrasonic Pulses in Solids , 1994, Science.

[10]  P. Hardigan,et al.  A comparison of the minimum canal wall thickness remaining following preparation using two nickel-titanium rotary systems. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[11]  David K. Hsu,et al.  An automated algorithm for simultaneously producing velocity and thickness images , 1994 .

[12]  George J Eckert,et al.  The applicability of half-mouth examination to periodontal disease assessment in untreated adult populations. , 2002, Journal of periodontology.

[13]  J. Katz,et al.  Elastic properties of bovine dentine and enamel. , 1970, Archives of oral biology.

[14]  I. Kaffe,et al.  Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[15]  F. E. Barber,et al.  Looking into the tooth and its surfaces with ultrasonics. , 1971, Ultrasonics.

[16]  E. Korostoff,et al.  Compressive Viscoelastic Properties of Human Dentin : I. Stress-Relaxation Behavior , 1975, Journal of dental research.

[17]  M. Huysmans,et al.  The reproducibility of ultrasonic enamel thickness measurements: an in vitro study. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[18]  W. Jungers,et al.  An evaluation of dental radiograph accuracy in the measurement of enamel thickness. , 2001, Archives of oral biology.

[19]  Nonlinear propagation effects on broadband attenuation measurements , 1998, 1998 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36102).

[20]  H. Sabine,et al.  Surface acoustic waves in communications engineering , 1971 .

[21]  Heinz U Lemke,et al.  Computer-assisted radiology. , 1988, Academic radiology.

[22]  H. Duschner,et al.  Using ultrasound transmission velocity to analyse the mechanical properties of teeth after in vitro, in situ, and in vivo irradiation , 2000, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[23]  P. H. Dehoff,et al.  Analysis of Tempering Stresses in Metal-Ceramic Disks , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[24]  H. Fujita,et al.  Nonlinear acoustic response through minute surface cracks: FEM simulation and experimentation. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[25]  G BAUM,et al.  Observation of Internal Structures of Teeth by Ultrasonography , 1963, Science.

[26]  M. Vásquez,et al.  Initial stress differences between sliding and sectional mechanics with an endosseous implant as anchorage: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2001, The Angle orthodontist.

[27]  Kenji Sawada,et al.  Development and application of an ultrasonic imaging system for dental diagnosis , 1985, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[28]  Patrick Lanceleur,et al.  Acoustic properties of wood in tridimensional representation of slowness surfaces. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[29]  Daly Ch,et al.  The use of ultra-sonic thickness measurement in the clinical evaluation of the oral soft tissues. , 1971 .

[30]  G Kossoff,et al.  Examination of the contents of the pulp cavity in teeth. , 1966, Ultrasonics.

[31]  A. Mombelli,et al.  On the symmetry of periodontal disease. , 2001, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[32]  S. Lees Ultra-sonics in hard tissues. , 1971, International dental journal.

[33]  M. Huysmans,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of enamel thickness: a tool for monitoring dental erosion? , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[34]  P He Simultaneous measurement of sound velocity and wall thickness of a tube. , 2001, Ultrasonics.

[35]  P. A. Payne,et al.  Determination of ultrasonic velocity in human enamel and dentine. , 1989, Archives of oral biology.

[36]  D. Watmough Role of ultrasonic cleaning in control of cross-infection in dentistry. , 1994, Ultrasonics.

[37]  C. Meyer,et al.  Fast Envelope Detection for Thinned Display of Finely Digitized Ultrasound Scans , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  V. Malakhov,et al.  Symmetry of priapulids (Priapulida). 1. Symmetry of adults , 2001, Journal of morphology.