The power of size: A meta-analysis reveals consistency of allometric regressions

Abstract The recent revival of body size relationships in ecology has boosted our understanding of ecosystems. Here, a simple model, based on energy equivalency, integrates rate, age, density and area parameters that are important in ecological modelling. Allometric relationships for quantities as diverse as ingestion, mortality, age at maturity, maximum density, territory size of different species groups and trophic levels are derived from production and some ecological transfer efficiencies. The theory is supported by a meta-analysis of 230 allometric regressions derived from over 100 publications. The relationships are shown to be mutually consistent and fit into the model. Rate constants generally decrease with organism mass at an exponent of −1/4. Age and density parameters increase in the same direction following a slope of 1/4. Differences between plants, invertebrates, cold-blooded vertebrates and warm-blooded vertebrates are reflected in the intercepts and can be anticipated from temperature, trophic position and evolutionary history. Cold-blooded species have lower rate constants but reach higher ages and densities than equally sized warm-blooded organisms. Intercepts of body size distributions tend to decrease with trophic position, at a level that is predicted by ecological efficiencies. Area parameters, such as the territory size and geographic range, tend to decrease with species size, but slopes and intercepts were often different from the expected value. Occasionally, outliers were also noted for rate, time or density parameters. With the model at hand, such deviations can be easily identified and subjected to more extensive empirical and theoretical research. With these restrictions, specific issues can now be addressed by a framework that complies with extensive information on related parameters.

[1]  Barry G Lovegrove,et al.  The Zoogeography of Mammalian Basal Metabolic Rate , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Madan K. Oli,et al.  Relative importance of avian life-history variables to population growth rate , 2006 .

[3]  Mark E. Baird,et al.  A size-resolved pelagic ecosystem model , 2007 .

[4]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[5]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Ecosystems emerging: 3. Openness , 1999 .

[6]  W. Humphreys Production and Respiration in Animal Populations , 1979 .

[7]  D. Griffiths,et al.  Sampling effort, regression method, and the shape and slope of size–abundance relations , 1998 .

[8]  H. H. Laar,et al.  Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  A. J. Hendriks,et al.  Allometric scaling of rate, age and density parameters in ecological models , 1999 .

[10]  James H Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of metabolic rate from molecules and mitochondria to cells and mammals , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[12]  C. K. Minns Allometry of home range size in lake and river fishes , 1995 .

[13]  A. Hendriks,et al.  The power of size. 2. Rate constants and equilibrium ratios for accumulation of inorganic substances related to species weight , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  Katsuhiko Yoshida Intra-clade predation facilitates the evolution of larger body size , 2006 .

[15]  Han Olff,et al.  Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges , 2002, Nature.

[16]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  What Do Real Population Dynamics Tell Us About Minimum Viable Population Sizes , 1990 .

[17]  K. Gaston,et al.  A critical assessment of the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and body size in animals , 1997 .

[18]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[19]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[20]  M. Kleiber Body size and metabolism , 1932 .

[21]  P. Marquet,et al.  Scaling and power-laws in ecological systems , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[23]  U. Lohm,et al.  Energetical significance of the annelids and arthropods in a Swedish grassland soil , 1977 .

[24]  Robert M. May,et al.  Estimating r: A Pedagogical Note , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[25]  I. Lamprecht,et al.  Thermodynamics of biological processes , 1978 .

[26]  D. Strayer Perspectives on the Size Structure of Lacustrine Zoobenthos, Its Causes, and Its Consequences , 1991, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[27]  C. Duarte,et al.  Weight-density relationships in submerged macrophytes , 1987, Oecologia.

[28]  David Tilman,et al.  Insect species diversity, abundance and body size relationships , 1996, Nature.

[29]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[30]  D. Reichle,et al.  Relation of Body Size to Food Intake, Oxygen Consumption, and Trace Element Metabolism in Forest Floor Arthropods , 1968 .

[31]  P. Calow,et al.  CONVERSION EFFICIENCIES IN HETEROTROPHIC ORGANISMS , 1977 .

[32]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Scaling in Biology , 2000 .

[33]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Thermodynamic and metabolic effects on the scaling of production and population energy use , 2003 .

[34]  A. Hendriks,et al.  Modelling non-equilibrium concentrations of microcontaminants in organisms: comparative kinetics as a function of species size and octanol-water partitioning. , 1995, Chemosphere.

[35]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[36]  A. Newton Dynamics of Tropical Communities , 1999 .

[37]  R. Ramos‐Jiliberto,et al.  Pre-encounter versus post-encounter inducible defenses in predator–prey model systems , 2007 .

[38]  H. Olff,et al.  Species-richness of African grazer assemblages: towards a functional explanation. , 1998 .

[39]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology , 2004 .

[40]  J. Childress,et al.  Decline in Pelagic Cephalopod Metabolism With Habitat Depth Reflects Differences in Locomotory Efficiency. , 1997, The Biological bulletin.

[41]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of size and temperature on developmental time , 2002, Nature.

[42]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate , 2001, Science.

[43]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Strategies and difficulties of applying models to aquatic populations and food webs , 1988 .

[44]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  Foraging Strategy and Metabolic Rate in Spiders , 1980 .

[45]  S. McNaughton,et al.  Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats , 1989, Nature.

[46]  W. Calder Diversity and convergence: scaling for conservation , 2000 .

[47]  Andrea Belgrano,et al.  Allometric scaling of maximum population density: a common rule for marine phytoplankton and terrestrial plants , 2002 .

[48]  J. Diamond,et al.  Dinosaurs, dragons, and dwarfs: The evolution of maximal body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  H. Cyr,et al.  Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems , 1993, Nature.

[50]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Ecosystems emerging: 2. Dissipation , 1999 .

[51]  L. Schroeder Consumer growth efficiencies: Their limits and relationships to ecological energetics , 1981 .

[52]  A. Dunham,et al.  The Temperature‐Size Rule in Ectotherms: Simple Evolutionary Explanations May Not Be General , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[53]  J. Mordenti,et al.  Man versus beast: pharmacokinetic scaling in mammals. , 1986, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[54]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  A general model for mass-growth-density relations across tree-dominated communities , 2003 .

[55]  J. Weitz,et al.  Re-examination of the "3/4-law" of metabolism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[56]  R. Martin,et al.  Relative brain size and basal metabolic rate in terrestrial vertebrates , 1981, Nature.

[57]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[58]  John Tyler Bonner,et al.  On size and life , 1983 .

[59]  J. Andersen,et al.  The energetic equivalence rule rejected because of a potentially common sampling error: evidence from carabid beetles , 2003 .

[60]  J. Anderson Succession, diversity and trophic relationships of some soil animals in decomposing leaf litter , 1975 .

[61]  Azbel MYa,et al.  Universal biological scaling and mortality , 1994 .

[62]  A. Heusner Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber's equation a statistical artifact? , 1982, Respiration physiology.

[63]  Walter Jetz,et al.  The Scaling of Animal Space Use , 2004, Science.

[64]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  PISCATOR, an individual-based model to analyze the dynamics of lake fish communities , 2002 .

[65]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Broad-scale comparison of photosynthesis in terrestrial and aquatic plant communities , 1997 .

[66]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PRODUCTIVITY, HERBIVORY, AND PLANT SPECIES TURNOVER IN GRASSLAND FOOD WEBS , 2000 .

[67]  D. H. Reed,et al.  Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates , 2003 .

[68]  James O. Farlow,et al.  A Consideration of the Trophic Dynamics of a Late Cretaceous Large-Dinosaur Community (Oldman Formation) , 1976 .

[69]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[70]  José-Manuel Rey,et al.  An entropy-based heterogeneity index for mass-size distributions in Earth science , 2004 .

[71]  H. Cyr Individual energy use and the allometry of population density , 2000 .