Isoplanatic angle and optimal guide star separation for multiconjugate adaptive optics

We propose a first orae performance estimation of multiconjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) systems. An important and restrictive parameter is the angular guide star (GS) separation for a field of view (FOV) of interest to be compensated. An analytical approach is proposed to estimate the residual variance of a MCAO systems for a given position in the FOV as a function of GS separation. This approach allows us to define expected isoplanatic angles for MCAO systems as a function of the atmospheric and observing conditions (turbulence profile, telescope diameter and GS separation). The analytical results are also compared with the numerical simulation of a MCAO system, in which a great care has been taken in the 3D wavefront reconstruction from 2D wavefront sensor (WFS) measurements. For a 8 m telescope, we show that 3 GS's and 3 deformable mirrors provides very good performance in a 200 arcseconds FOV at 2.2 micrometer.

[1]  D. Fried.  Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics , 1982 .

[2]  Brent L. Ellerbroek,et al.  Profiles of nighttime turbulence above Mauna Kea and isoplanatism extension in adaptive optics , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[3]  G. A. Vogel,et al.  Real-time atmospheric compensation by stimulated Brillouin-scattering phase conjugation , 1995 .

[4]  Gerard Rousset,et al.  First diffraction-limited astronomical images with adaptive optics , 1990, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[5]  B. Ellerbroek.  First-order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensatio , 1994 .

[6]  F. Rigaut,et al.  Astronomy: Optics adapt to the whole sky , 2000, Nature.

[7]  F. Chassat,et al.  Theoretical evaluation of the isoplanatic patch of an adaptive optics system working through the atmospheric turbulence , 1989 .

[8]  R. Ragazzoni,et al.  No Laser Guide Stars for adaptive optics in giant telescopes , 1999 .

[9]  Robert H. Dicke,et al.  Phase-contrast detection of telescope seeing errors and their correction. , 1975 .

[10]  Jacques M. Beckers,et al.  Detailed Compensation Of Atmospheric Seeing Using Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics , 1989, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  J. Conan,et al.  Efficient phase estimation for large-field-of-view adaptive optics. , 1999, Optics letters.

[12]  Benjamin L. McGlamery,et al.  Computer Simulation Studies Of Compensation Of Turbulence Degraded Images , 1976, Other Conferences.

[13]  Laurent M. Mugnier,et al.  Phase estimation for large field of view: application to multiconjugate adaptive optics , 1999, Optics + Photonics.

[14]  Byron M. Welsh,et al.  Analysis of Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics , 1992, Adaptive Optics for Large Telescopes.

[15]  J. Hardy,et al.  Real-time atmospheric compensation , 1977 .

[16]  N. Hubin,et al.  New challenges for adaptive optics: extremely large telescopes , 2000, astro-ph/0004065.

[17]  Jacques M. Beckers,et al.  Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 1988 .

[18]  T. Fusco,et al.  Characterization of adaptive optics point spread function for anisoplanatic imaging. Application to stellar field deconvolution , 2000 .

[19]  Yingjian Wang.  Anisoplanatism in Adaptive Optics Using Synthetic Beacons , 1996 .

[20]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  Adaptive-optics corrections available for the whole sky , 2000, Nature.