Sensitive calibration and measurement procedures based on the amplification principle in motion perception

We compare two types of sampled motion stimuli: ordinary periodic displays with modulation amplitude m(o=e) that translate 90 degrees between successive frames and amplifier sandwich displays. In sandwich displays, even-numbered frames are of one type, odd-numbered frames are of the same or different type, and (1) both types have the same period, (2) translate in a consistent direction 90 degrees between frames, and (3) even frames have modulation amplitude m(e), odd frames have modulation amplitude m(o). In both first-order motion (van Santen, J.P.H. & Sperling, G. (1984). Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 451-73) and second-order motion (Werkhoven, P., Sperling, G., & Chubb, C. (1993). Motion perception between dissimilar gratings: a single channel theory. Vision Research, 33, 463-85) the motion strength of amplifier sandwich displays is proportional to the product m(o)m(e) for a wide range of m(e). By setting m(e) to a large value, an amplifier sandwich stimulus with a very small value of m(o) can still produce visible motion. The amplification factor is the ratio of two threshold modulation amplitudes: ordinary circumflexm(o=e) over amplified circumflexm(o), circumflexm(o=e)/circumflexm(o). We find amplification factors of up to about 8x. Light adaptation and contrast gain control in early visual processing distort the representations of visual stimuli so that inputs to subsequent perceptual processes contain undesired distortion products or 'impurities'. Motion amplification is used to measure and thence to reduce these unwanted components in a stimulus to a small fraction of their threshold. Such stimuli are certifiably pure in the sense that the residual impurity is less than a specified value. Six applications are considered: (1) removing (first-order) luminance contamination from moving (second-order) texture gratings; (2) removing luminance contamination from moving chromatic gratings to produce pure isoluminant gratings; (3) removing distortion products in luminance-modulated (first-order) gratings - by iterative application, all significant distortion products can be removed; (4) removing second-order texture contamination from third-order motion displays; (5) removing feature bias from third-order motion displays; (6) and the same general principles are applied to texture-slant discrimination in which x,y spatial coordinates replace the x,t motion coordinates. In all applicable domains, the amplification principle provides a powerful assay method for the precise measurement of very weak stimuli, and thereby a means of producing visual displays of certifiable purity.

[1]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? , 1999, Vision Research.

[4]  M. J. Morgan,et al.  Contrast facilitation in motion detection: evidence for a Reichardt detector in human vision , 1999, Vision Research.

[5]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The extraction of Spatio-temporal Energy in Human and Machine Vision , 1997 .

[7]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  A look at motion in the frequency domain , 1983 .

[8]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[9]  G. Sperling,et al.  The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  George Sperling,et al.  Attention-generated apparent motion , 1995, Nature.

[12]  G. Sperling,et al.  Full-wave and half-wave rectification in second-order motion perception , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  G. Sperling,et al.  Contrast gain control in first- and second-order motion perception. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[15]  J. Krauskopf,et al.  Cone Contrast and Opponent Modulation Color Spaces 565 ( a ) , 2022 .

[16]  W. Reichardt.  Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems , 1957 .

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance , 1983 .

[18]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  G. Sperling,et al.  Second-order motion perception: space/time separable mechanisms , 1989, [1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion.

[20]  George Sperling,et al.  Three Systems for Visual Motion Perception , 1996 .

[21]  ANDREW T SMITH,et al.  Separate Detection of Moving Luminance and Contrast Modulations: Fact or Artifact? , 1997, Vision Research.

[22]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  High-Level Motion Processing , 1998 .

[23]  D. Macleod,et al.  Contrast-modulation flicker: Dynamics and spatial resolution of the light adaptation process , 1998, Vision Research.

[24]  S. M. Axstis.  PHI MOVEMENT AS A SUBTRACTION PROCESS , 1970 .

[25]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Functional segregation of color and motion perception examined in motion nulling , 1993, Vision Research.

[26]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Phenomenology of attention: I. Color, location, orientation, and spatial frequency. , 1998 .

[27]  C F Stromeyer,et al.  Contributions of human long‐wave and middle‐wave cones to motion detection. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  W. Stiles,et al.  Interactions among chromatic mechanisms as inferred from positive and negative increment thresholds. , 1964, Vision research.

[29]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Texture Analysis Using Two-Dimensional Quadrature Filters , 1983 .

[30]  Mary M. Conte,et al.  Nonlinear Preprocessing in Short-range Motion , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  G Sperling,et al.  Measuring the amplification of attention. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Weale,et al.  Colour Vision Deficiencies , 1981 .

[34]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  The contribution of color to motion in normal and color-deficient observers , 1991, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Allik,et al.  Contrast response of a movement-encoding system. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  Z L Lu,et al.  Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[39]  G Sperling,et al.  Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.