Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes

Abstract Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement.

[1]  R. Clift,et al.  Soil Organic Carbon Changes in the Cultivation of Energy Crops: Implications for GHG Balances and Soil Quality for Use in LCA , 2011 .

[2]  S. Ogle,et al.  Climate-smart soils , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Duncan McLaren,et al.  A comparative global assessment of potential negative emissions technologies , 2012 .

[4]  Massimo Tavoni,et al.  Modeling meets science and technology: an introduction to a special issue on negative emissions , 2013, Climatic Change.

[5]  Phil Williamson,et al.  Emissions reduction: Scrutinize CO2 removal methods , 2016, Nature.

[6]  David Styles,et al.  Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms , 2015 .

[7]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[8]  B. M. Petersen,et al.  An approach to include soil carbon changes in life cycle assessments , 2013 .

[9]  R. Plevin.  Assessing the Climate Effects of Biofuels Using Integrated Assessment Models, Part I: Methodological Considerations , 2017 .

[10]  A. Marvuglia,et al.  A return on experience from the application of agent-based simulations coupled with life cycle assessment to model agricultural processes , 2017 .

[11]  William F. Lamb,et al.  Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects , 2018 .

[12]  Pietro Goglio,et al.  Addressing crop interactions within cropping systems in LCA , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming , 2011 .

[14]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Can the Predictions of Consequential Life Cycle Assessment Be Tested in the Real World? Comment on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation...” , 2014 .

[15]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in agent-based modelling and consequential life cycle assessment coupled models: A critical review , 2017 .

[16]  Won-Jun Park,et al.  CO2 emission reduction by reuse of building material waste in the Japanese cement industry , 2014 .

[17]  R. Krishna,et al.  Polyamine-tethered porous polymer networks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  J. Moore,et al.  Review of geoengineering approaches to mitigating climate change , 2015 .

[19]  A. Cowie,et al.  Quantifying the climate change effects of bioenergy systems: Comparison of 15 impact assessment methods , 2019, GCB Bioenergy.

[20]  Poritosh Roy,et al.  A Review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bioethanol from Lignocellulosic Biomass , 2012 .

[21]  Z. Ren,et al.  The global potential for converting renewable electricity to negative-CO2-emissions hydrogen , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[22]  William F. Lamb,et al.  Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling , 2018 .

[23]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers , 2014 .

[24]  Reid Lifset,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment , 2014 .

[25]  David William Keith,et al.  A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere , 2018, Joule.

[26]  Pete Smith,et al.  Natural climate solutions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  20 years of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the forestry sector: state of the art and a methodical proposal for the LCA of forest production , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[28]  Ming Xu,et al.  Agent-based life cycle assessment for switchgrass-based bioenergy systems , 2015 .

[29]  Pete Smith,et al.  Research priorities for negative emissions , 2016 .

[30]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Response to Comments on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation …” , 2014 .

[31]  André Bardow,et al.  Cleaner production of cleaner fuels: wind-to-wheel – environmental assessment of CO2-based oxymethylene ether as a drop-in fuel , 2018 .

[32]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[33]  D. Beerling,et al.  Farming with crops and rocks to address global climate, food and soil security , 2018, Nature Plants.

[34]  Alain Haurie,et al.  Application of three independent consequential LCA approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[35]  Matthias Schulz,et al.  Streamlining life cycle inventory data generation in agriculture using traceability data and information and communication technologies – part I: concepts and technical basis , 2014 .

[36]  Ward N. Smith,et al.  Accounting for soil carbon changes in agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA): a review , 2015 .

[37]  Ali Hasanbeigi,et al.  Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review , 2012 .

[38]  D. Manning,et al.  Assessing the potential of soil carbonation and enhanced weathering through Life Cycle Assessment: A case study for Sao Paulo State, Brazil , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[39]  P. Renforth,et al.  Carbon dioxide efficiency of terrestrial enhanced weathering. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Stephen Moysey,et al.  A Stochastic Approach to Model Dynamic Systems in Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[41]  M. Allen,et al.  A solution to the misrepresentations of CO2-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation , 2018, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

[42]  M. Raugei,et al.  Unresolved issues in the accounting of biogenic carbon exchanges in the wine sector , 2014 .

[43]  Birka Wicke,et al.  Indirect land use change: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation , 2012 .

[44]  Solomon F. Brown,et al.  Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward , 2018 .

[45]  Ward N. Smith,et al.  Impact of management strategies on the global warming potential at the cropping system level. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[46]  David William Keith,et al.  A Process for Capturing CO 2 from the Atmosphere , 2018 .

[47]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis , 2018 .

[48]  S. Jose,et al.  Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: an overview , 2012, Agroforestry Systems.