Verification of WWTP design guidelines with activated sludge process models

There is significant interest in using process models for WWTP design to complement the traditional design guidelines. However, transparent quantification of the differences in the design results obtained with the two approaches has not been done yet. The objective of this paper is to define a methodology to evaluate the expected performance of a designed WWTP. The use of this methodology will enable to identify inherent safety incorporated in design guidelines by verification with dynamic process models. The methodology includes two parts: first, multiple designs are made using a design guideline for different combinations of influent characteristics, effluent requirements, safety factors and operating preferences. Second, the results of the designs (e.g. reactor volumes) are applied in a process model that emulates WWTP behaviour. The effluent concentrations predicted by the process model are then compared to the effluent requirements which were imposed for the designs. The methodology is illustrated using the Metcalf & Eddy design guidelines for a nitrogen-removing process and the ASM1 process model.

[1]  Krist V. Gernaey,et al.  Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[3]  Gustaf Olsson,et al.  Integration of wastewater treatment plant design and operation - A systematic approach using cost functions , 1996 .

[4]  Sylvie Gillot,et al.  The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .

[5]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Model-based evaluation of two BNR processes--UCT and A2N. , 2001, Water research.

[6]  J B Copp,et al.  Wastewater treatment modelling in practice: a collaborative discussion of the state of the art. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  I Irizar,et al.  Design and operation of SBR processes for small plants based on simulations. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Glen T. Daigger,et al.  Evaluation and design of full-scale wastewater treatment plants using biological process models , 1995 .

[9]  S Salem,et al.  Model-based evaluation of a new upgrading concept for N-removal. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Lluís Corominas,et al.  How do Initial Design Assumptions Determine Plant Sizing? Assessing Activated Sludge Process Design using Monte-Carlo Simulation and Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2010 .

[11]  I. Takács A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[12]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Probabilistic modelling and evaluation of wastewater treatment plant upgrades in a water quality based evaluation context. , 2010 .

[13]  Gürkan Sin,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design. , 2009, Water research.

[14]  Bruce R. Johnson,et al.  Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint , 2009 .

[15]  Guenter Langergraber,et al.  Using dynamic simulation for design of activated sludge plants. , 2008 .

[16]  Alejandro Rivas,et al.  Model-based optimisation of Wastewater Treatment Plants design , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  K. Brischke,et al.  A balancing act: the consulting engineers' pragmatic view of process modelling. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  Ignasi Rodríguez-Roda,et al.  Knowledge extraction during the design of activated sludge systems , 2006 .