Temporal disaggregation of satellite-derived monthly precipitation estimates and the resulting propagation of error in partitioning of water at the land surface

Abstract. Global estimates of precipitation can now be made using data from a combination of geosynchronous and low earth-orbit satellites. However, revisit patterns of polar-orbiting satellites and the need to sample mixed-clouds scenes from geosynchronous satellites leads to the coarsening of the temporal resolution to the monthly scale. There are prohibitive limitations to the applicability of monthly-scale aggregated precipitation estimates in many hydrological applications. The nonlinear and threshold dependencies of surface hydrological processes on precipitation may cause the hydrological response of the surface to vary considerably based on the intermittent temporal structure of the forcing. Therefore, to make the monthly satellite data useful for hydrological applications (i.e. water balance studies, rainfall-runoff modelling, etc.), it is necessary to disaggregate the monthly precipitation estimates into shorter time intervals so that they may be used in surface hydrology models. In this study, two simple statistical disaggregation schemes are developed for use with monthly precipitation estimates provided by satellites. The two techniques are shown to perform relatively well in introducing a reasonable temporal structure into the disaggregated time series. An ensemble of disaggregated realisations was routed through two land surface models of varying complexity so that the error propagation that takes place over the course of the month could be characterised. Results suggest that one of the proposed disaggregation schemes can be used in hydrological applications without introducing significant error. Keywords: precipitation, temporal disaggregation, hydrological modelling, error propagation

[1]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Forcing, intermittency, and land surface hydrologic partitioning , 1997 .

[2]  D. Wilks Conditioning stochastic daily precipitation models on total monthly precipitation , 1989 .

[3]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Probabilistic representation of the temporal rainfall process by a modified Neyman‐Scott Rectangular Pulses Model: Parameter estimation and validation , 1989 .

[4]  Peter S. Eagleson,et al.  Climatology of Station Storm Rainfall in the Continental United States: Parameters of the Bartlett-Lewis and Poisson Rectangular Pulses Models , 1992 .

[5]  Chris G. Collier,et al.  Applications of weather radar systems: A guide to uses of radar data in meteorology and hydrology , 1989 .

[6]  Robert F. Adler,et al.  Estimation of Monthly Rainfall over Japan and Surrounding Waters from a Combination of Low-Orbit Microwave and Geosynchronous IR Data , 1993 .

[7]  G. Salvucci,et al.  Derived Distributions of Storm Depth and Frequency Conditioned on Monthly Total Precipitation: Adding Value to Historical and Satellite-Derived Estimates of Monthly Precipitation , 2000 .

[8]  Edward C. Waymire,et al.  Scale considerations in the modeling of temporal rainfall , 1984 .

[9]  Steven A. Margulis Temporal disaggregation of satellite-derived monthly precipitation estimates for use in hydrologic applications , 1998 .

[10]  Approximations of Temporal Rainfall From a Multidimensional Model , 1985 .

[11]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[12]  Shafiqul Islam,et al.  Aggregation‐disaggregation properties of a stochastic rainfall model , 1994 .

[13]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Disaggregation of daily rainfall , 1987 .

[14]  David R. Legates,et al.  The Accuracy of United States Precipitation Data , 1994 .

[15]  J. Janowiak,et al.  The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset , 1997 .