Novel Relationships Among Ten Fish Model Species Revealed Based on a Phylogenomic Analysis Using ESTs
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Rosen,et al. Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationships of the ostariophysan and gonorynchiform fishes. American Museum novitates ; no. 2428 , 1970 .
[2] Paramvir S. Dehal,et al. Whole-Genome Shotgun Assembly and Analysis of the Genome of Fugu rubripes , 2002, Science.
[3] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Taxon sampling, bioinformatics, and phylogenomics. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[4] B. Venkatesh,et al. The mitochondrial genome of Indonesian coelacanth Latimeria menadoensis (Sarcopterygii: Coelacanthiformes) and divergence time estimation between the two coelacanths. , 2005, Gene.
[5] D. Hillis,et al. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[6] Hidetoshi Shimodaira. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. , 2002, Systematic biology.
[7] A. Meyer,et al. Phylogenetic Timing of the Fish-Specific Genome Duplication Correlates with the Diversification of Teleost Fish , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[8] B. Larget,et al. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms for the Bayesian Analysis of Phylogenetic Trees , 2000 .
[9] Michael J. Sanderson,et al. R8s: Inferring Absolute Rates of Molecular Evolution, Divergence times in the Absence of a Molecular Clock , 2003, Bioinform..
[10] J. S. Nelson,et al. Fishes of the world. , 1978 .
[11] Sudhir Kumar,et al. MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment , 2004, Briefings Bioinform..
[12] Alfried P Vogler,et al. Dense taxonomic EST sampling and its applications for molecular systematics of the Coleoptera (beetles). , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[13] M. P. Cummings,et al. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.
[14] G. D. Johnson,et al. Chapter 12 – Relationships of Lower Euteleostean Fishes , 1996 .
[15] Hans A Hofmann,et al. Biologically meaningful expression profiling across species using heterologous hybridization to a cDNA microarray , 2004, BMC Genomics.
[16] A. Chicaro,et al. Animal Evolution and the Molecular Signature of Radiations Compressed in Time , 2005 .
[17] Y. Kohara,et al. Extensive analysis of ORF sequences from two different cichlid species in Lake Victoria provides molecular evidence for a recent radiation event of the Victoria species flock: identity of EST sequences between Haplochromis chilotes and Haplochromis sp. "Redtailsheller". , 2004, Gene.
[18] Sudhindra R Gadagkar,et al. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. , 2005, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.
[19] Derrick J. Zwickl,et al. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? , 2003, Systematic biology.
[20] M. Nishida,et al. Mitochondrial Molecular Clocks and the Origin of Euteleostean Biodiversity: Familial Radiation of Perciforms May Have Predated the Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary , 2000 .
[21] David M. Johnson,et al. Percomorph phylogeny: a survey of acanthomorphs and a new proposal , 1993 .
[22] D. Higgins,et al. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[23] D. Rosen,et al. The structure and relationships of the paracanthopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 141, article 3 , 1970 .
[24] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Efficiency of the Neighbor-Joining Method in Reconstructing Deep and Shallow Evolutionary Relationships in Large Phylogenies , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[25] H. Shaffer,et al. Assessing Concordance of Fossil Calibration Points in Molecular Clock Studies: An Example Using Turtles , 2004, The American Naturalist.
[26] D. Rosen. Phylogeny and zoogeography of salmoniform fishes and relationships of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 153, article 2 , 1974 .
[27] Eric Vigoda,et al. Phylogenetic MCMC Algorithms Are Misleading on Mixtures of Trees , 2005, Science.
[28] Dirk Steinke,et al. EverEST ? A phylogenomic EST database approach , 2004 .
[29] Stanley H. Weitzman,et al. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 131, article 4 , 1967 .
[30] James A. Lake,et al. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative genomics , 1998 .
[31] S. Fink. Chapter 11 – Interrelationships of Ostariophysan Fishes (Teleostei) , 1996 .
[32] M. Allard,et al. Sources of incongruence among mammalian mitochondrial sequences: COII, COIII, and ND6 genes are main contributors. , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[33] M. Miya,et al. Use of mitogenomic information in teleostean molecular phylogenetics: a tree-based exploration under the maximum-parsimony optimality criterion. , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[34] A. Meyer,et al. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. , 2003, Genome research.
[35] M. Simmons,et al. Efficiently resolving the basal clades of a phylogenetic tree using Bayesian and parsimony approaches: a case study using mitogenomic data from 100 higher teleost fishes. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[36] Masami Hasegawa,et al. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection , 2001, Bioinform..
[37] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[38] J. Klein,et al. Molecular phylogeny of early vertebrates: monophyly of the agnathans as revealed by sequences of 35 genes. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.
[39] Carol A. Stepien,et al. CHAPTER 1 – Molecules and Morphology in Studies of Fish Evolution , 1997 .
[40] Axel Meyer,et al. Magic bullets and golden rules: data sampling in molecular phylogenetics. , 2005, Zoology.
[41] David Posada,et al. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution , 2005, Bioinform..
[42] F. Santini,et al. A phylogeny of the families of fossil and extant tetraodontiform fishes (Acanthomorpha, Tetraodontiformes), Upper Cretaceous to Recent , 2003 .
[43] Wei‐Jen Chen,et al. Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[44] Charles E. Chapple,et al. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype , 2004, Nature.
[45] Bruce B. Collette,et al. The Diversity of Fishes , 1997 .
[46] J. Felsenstein. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[47] S. Whelan,et al. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.
[48] G. Arratia,et al. Semionotiform fish from the Upper Jurassic of Tendaguru (Tanzania) , 1999 .
[49] J. C. Regier,et al. More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). , 2000, Systematic biology.
[50] Wiley,et al. The interrelationships of Acanthomorph fishes: A total evidence approach using molecular and morphological data. , 2000, Biochemical systematics and ecology.
[51] J. Inoue,et al. Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[52] S. Carroll,et al. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies , 2003, Nature.
[53] S. Carroll,et al. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[54] M. Miya,et al. Basal euteleostean relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogenetic reality of the "Protacanthopterygii". , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[55] M. P. Cummings,et al. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .
[56] A. Westphal,et al. A Novel Functional Class I Lineage in Zebrafish (Danio rerio), Carp (Cyprinus carpio), and Large Barbus (Barbus intermedius) Showing an Unusual Conservation of the Peptide Binding Domains , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.
[57] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Vertebrate Genomes Compared , 2002, Science.
[58] G. Cowles. Studies of Mascarene Island birds: The fossil record , 1987 .
[59] M. C. D. Pinna,et al. Chapter 7 – Teleostean Monophyly , 1996 .
[60] O. Gascuel,et al. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[61] John P. Huelsenbeck,et al. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..
[62] M. Sanderson,et al. Assessing the quality of molecular divergence time estimates by fossil calibrations and fossil-based model selection. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[63] L. S. Berg. System der rezenten und fossilen Fischartigen und Fische , 1958 .
[64] D. Gerhold,et al. It's the genes! EST access to human genome content , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[65] Axel Meyer,et al. Novel evolutionary relationship among four fish model systems. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[66] J. Klein,et al. The phylogenetic relationship of tetrapod, coelacanth, and lungfish revealed by the sequences of forty-four nuclear genes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[67] J. Inoue,et al. Mitochondrial Genomics of Ostariophysan Fishes: Perspectives on Phylogeny and Biogeography , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[68] J. Inoue,et al. Mitogenomic evidence for the monophyly of elopomorph fishes (Teleostei) and the evolutionary origin of the leptocephalus larva. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.