Effect of frequency on seismic response of reinforced soil slopes in shaking table tests

This paper studies the effect of frequency of base shaking on the dynamic response of unreinforced and reinforced soil slopes through a series of shaking table tests. Slopes were constructed using clayey sand and geogrids were used for reinforcing the slopes. Two different slope angles 45 degrees and 60 degrees were used in tests and the quantity and location of reinforcement is varied in different tests. Acceleration of shaking is kept constant as 0.3 g in all the tests to maximize the response and the frequency of shaking was 2 Hz, 5 Hz and 7 Hz in different tests. The slope is instrumented with ultrasonic displacement sensors and accelerometers at different elevations. The response of different slopes is compared in terms of the deformation of the slope and acceleration amplifications measured at different elevations. It is observed that the displacements at all elevations increased with increase in frequency for all slopes, whereas the effect of frequency on acceleration amplifications is not significant for reinforced slopes. Results showed that the acceleration and displacement response is not increasing proportionately with the increase in the frequency, suggesting that the role of frequency in the seismic response is very important. Reinforced slopes showed lesser displacements compared to unreinforced slopes at all frequency levels. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Ching-Chuan Huang,et al.  Dynamic behavior of reinforced slopes: horizontal acceleration response , 2010 .

[2]  A. Murali Krishna,et al.  Seismic response of wrap-faced reinforced soil-retaining wall models using shaking table tests , 2007 .

[3]  Ching-Chuan Huang,et al.  SEISMIC STABILITY OF SOIL RETAINING WALLS SITUATED ON SLOPE , 2004 .

[4]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Influence of reinforcement parameters on the seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil retaining walls , 2007 .

[5]  R D Holtz,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF REINFORCED STEEP SOIL SLOPES: RESULTS OF A SHAKING TABLE STUDY , 2004 .

[6]  S. Kramer.  Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[7]  B. V. S. Viswanadham,et al.  Centrifuge modeling of geotextile-reinforced slopes subjected to differential settlements , 2009 .

[8]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Experimental design, instrumentation and interpretation of reinforced soil wall response using a shaking table , 2004 .

[9]  Ching-Chuan Huang,et al.  Dynamic behavior of reinforced walls – Horizontal displacement response , 2011 .

[10]  A. Murali Krishna,et al.  Seismic response of reinforced soil retaining wall models: Influence of backfill relative density , 2008 .

[11]  Chia-Nan Liu,et al.  Lessons learned from three failures on a high steep geogrid-reinforced slope , 2012 .

[12]  Abbas Ghalandarzadeh,et al.  Experimental study on seismic deformation modes of reinforced-soil walls , 2009 .

[13]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  Post-earthquake investigation on several geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls and slopes during the Ji-Ji earthquake of Taiwan , 2001 .

[14]  Takeshi Sato,et al.  Shaking and Tilt Table Tests of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil and Conventional-Type Retaining Walls , 1998 .

[15]  Nicholas Sitar,et al.  Centrifuge Model Studies of the Seismic Response of Reinforced Soil Slopes , 2006 .