Advanced Demonstration of Fuel Injector/Flameholder for High Speed Ramburners.

Abstract : The combustion efficiency of ramburner technology is mixing-limited. Therefore, significant gains are possible if the fuel-air mixing can be increased without a significant increase in pressure loss or a decrease in flame stability. Several design concepts were explored in this report that increase the fuel-air mixing by generating large axial vortices downstream of the flameholder. The baseline flameholder for this project was the Integral Fuel Injector/Flameholder (1FF) used in previous studies by United Technologies Research Center (UTRC). CFD solutions were completed on the baseline design and 28 advanced configurations. Most designs did improve fuel-air mixing, but also increased the cold pressure loss by several fold. The most promising designs used the momentum of the fuel to contribute to the axial thrust, thereby reducing the pressure loss. Isothermal experimental tests were conducted at Wright laboratory in parallel with CFD analysis. A complete data set was taken for one baseline model, while several advanced models were screened for pressure loss. The baseline tests showed that a regular pattern of alternating vortices were shed from the base of the flameholder.

[1]  W. Lord,et al.  Navier-Stokes analysis of a lobed mixer and nozzle , 1990 .

[2]  Shinnosuke Obi,et al.  Second-moment calculation procedure for turbulent flows with collocated variable arrangement , 1991 .

[3]  A. Perry,et al.  Large-scale vortex structures in turbulent wakes behind bluff bodies. Part 1. Vortex formation processes , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  R. M. Stwalley,et al.  Flame stabilization using large flameholders of irregular shape , 1988 .

[5]  D. C. McCormick,et al.  Vortical and turbulent structure of a lobed mixer free shear layer , 1993 .

[6]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Computation of highly swirling confined flow with a Reynolds stress turbulence model , 1989 .

[7]  Tzong H. Chen,et al.  Design of Round-To-Square Transition Section; Analysis and Computer Code , 1993 .

[8]  W. P. Jones,et al.  Calculation of Confined Swirling Flows With a Second Moment Closure , 1989 .

[9]  A. Sehra,et al.  Experimental investigation of exhaust system mixers for a high bypass turbofan engine , 1993 .

[10]  T. Gatski,et al.  Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Peter Fry,et al.  Measurements of the Boundary-Layer Growth in Annular Diffusers , 1973 .

[12]  K. G. Schwartzkopf,et al.  Approach for Obtaining Unbiased Laser Doppler Velocimetry Data in Highly Turbulent Flows , 1986 .

[13]  B. Launder,et al.  Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[15]  A. Sjunnesson,et al.  CARS measurements and visualization of reacting flows in a bluff body stabilized flame , 1992 .

[16]  P. T. Woo,et al.  Boundary layer effects on stability characteristics of bluff-body flameholders , 1957 .

[17]  S. Orszag,et al.  Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique , 1992 .

[18]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames , 1981 .