Inference on C pk for autocorrelated data in the presence of random measurement errors

The present paper examines the properties of the C pk estimator when observations are autocorrelated and affected by measurement errors. The underlying reason for this choice of subject matter is that in industrial applications, process data are often autocorrelated, especially when sampling frequency is not particularly low, and even with the most advanced measuring instruments, gauge imprecision needs to be taken into consideration. In the case of a first-order stationary autoregressive process, we compare the statistical properties of the estimator in the error case with those of the estimator in the error-free case. Results indicate that the presence of gauge measurement errors leads the estimator to behave differently depending on the entity of error variability.

[1]  Rassoul Noorossana,et al.  Process capability analysis in the presence of autocorrelation , 2002 .

[2]  Michele Scagliarini,et al.  Estimation of Cpm when Measurement Error is Present , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[3]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Testing process capability based on Cpm in the presence of random measurement errors , 2005 .

[4]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Design and analysis of gauge R&R studies : making decisions with confidence intervals in random and mixed ANOVA models , 2005 .

[5]  Lora S. Zimmer,et al.  Process Capability Indices in Theory and Practice , 2000, Technometrics.

[6]  Murat Kulahci,et al.  A model‐free approach to eliminate autocorrelation when testing for process capability , 2008, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[7]  Erik Wallgren Essays on Capability Indices for Autocorrelated Data , 2007 .

[8]  Michele Scagliarini,et al.  Multivariate process capability using principal component analysis in the presence of measurement errors , 2011 .

[9]  Michele Scagliarini,et al.  Statistical analysis of process capability indices with measurement errors , 2002 .

[10]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter , 1990 .

[11]  Erik Wallgren,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Process Capability Index Cpk for Autocorrelated Quality Characteristics , 2001 .

[12]  J. Vargas,et al.  Comparison of Process Capability Indices under Autocorrelated Data , 2007 .

[13]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Applications. , 1995 .

[14]  Yu-Sheng Hsu,et al.  CAPABILITY MEASURES FOR m-DEPENDENT STATIONARY PROCESSES , 2003 .

[15]  Michele Scagliarini,et al.  ESTIMATION OF C p FOR AUTOCORRELATED DATA AND MEASUREMENT ERRORS , 2002 .

[16]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Design and Analysis of Gauge R&R Studies: Making Decisions with Confidence Intervals in Random and Mixed Anova Models (Asa-Siam Series on Statistics and Applied Probability 17) , 2005 .

[17]  Michele Scagliarini,et al.  Monitoring algorithms for detecting changes in the ozone concentrations , 2000 .

[18]  Erik Wallgren Properties of the Taguchi capability index for Markov dependent quality characteristics , 1998 .

[19]  H. Mittag Measurement Error Effects on the Performance of Process Capability Indices , 1997 .

[20]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Process Capability Indices , 1993 .

[21]  Nien Fan Zhang,et al.  Estimating process capability indexes for autocorrelated data , 1998 .

[22]  R Nour Alsana SHORT COMMUNICATION PROCESS CAPABILITY ANALYSIS IN THE PRESENCE OF AUTOCORRELATION , 2002 .