Ubiquitous Accessibility for People with Visual Impairments: Are We There Yet?

Ubiquitous access is an increasingly common vision of computing, wherein users can interact with any computing device or service from anywhere, at any time. In the era of personal computing, users with visual impairments required special-purpose, assistive technologies, such as screen readers, to interact with computers. This paper investigates whether technologies like screen readers have kept pace with, or have created a barrier to, the trend toward ubiquitous access, with a specific focus on desktop computing as this is still the primary way computers are used in education and employment. Towards that, the paper presents a user study with 21 visually-impaired participants, specifically involving the switching of screen readers within and across different computing platforms, and the use of screen readers in remote access scenarios. Among the findings, the study shows that, even for remote desktop access - an early forerunner of true ubiquitous access - screen readers are too limited, if not unusable. The study also identifies several accessibility needs, such as uniformity of navigational experience across devices, and recommends potential solutions. In summary, assistive technologies have not made the jump into the era of ubiquitous access, and multiple, inconsistent screen readers create new practical problems for users with visual impairments.

[1]  Jorge L. V. Barbosa,et al.  Hefestos: a model for ubiquitous accessibility support , 2012, PETRA '12.

[2]  Gilly Leshed,et al.  How Blind People Interact with Visual Content on Social Networking Services , 2016, CSCW.

[3]  I. V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Sinter: low-bandwidth remote access for the visually-impaired , 2016, EuroSys.

[4]  David J. Crandall,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Behaviors of People with Visual Impairments , 2015, CHI.

[5]  Ana Iglesias,et al.  Accessibility barriers for users of screen readers in the Moodle learning content management system , 2013, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[6]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Ubiquitous Accessibility, Common Technology Core, and Micro Assistive Technology: Commentary on “Computers and People with Disabilities” , 2008, TACC.

[7]  Maurice Erick Rensink,et al.  System for access. , 2006 .

[8]  Vicki L. Hanson,et al.  ACCESS: a technical framework for adaptive accessibility support , 2013, EICS '13.

[9]  Harry Hochheiser,et al.  A survey of blind users on the usability of email applications , 2013, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[10]  Kip Harris,et al.  Challenges and solutions for screen reader/I.T. interoperability , 2006, ASAC.

[11]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2017, ISS.

[12]  Kristen Shinohara,et al.  Observing Sara: a case study of a blind person's interactions with technology , 2007, Assets '07.

[13]  Matthew T. Atkinson,et al.  Towards ubiquitous accessibility: capability-based profiles and adaptations, delivered via the semantic web , 2012, W4A.

[14]  Jeffrey P. Bigham,et al.  WebAnywhere: a screen reader on-the-go , 2008, W4A '08.

[15]  Hidayat Ur Rahman,et al.  Remote access programs to better integrate individuals with disabilities , 2016, 2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT).

[16]  Morgan Dixon,et al.  Content and hierarchy in pixel-based methods for reverse engineering interface structure , 2011, CHI.

[17]  Jean Vanderdonckt,et al.  A Theoretical Survey of User Interface Description Languages: Preliminary Results , 2009, 2009 Latin American Web Congress.

[18]  Borja Gamecho,et al.  Automatically generating tailored accessible user interfaces for ubiquitous services , 2011, ASSETS '11.

[19]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges with Exercise Technologies for People who are Blind or Low-Vision , 2015, ASSETS.

[20]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  "With most of it being pictures now, I rarely use it": Understanding Twitter's Evolving Accessibility to Blind Users , 2016, CHI.