The effects on the student-teacher relationship in a one-to-one technology classroom

This embedded case study explores the student-teacher relationship in a one-to-one technology environment. The actual change in relationship in a one-to-one classroom was examined. The study was guided by the self-system theory of motivation and its three characteristics of autonomy, relatedness, and competency as a theoretical framework. To explore this topic, the researchers considered the perspectives of four classroom teachers and 207 high school students at a suburban public high school in New Jersey. The case study research utilized teacher interviews, classroom observations, student surveys, and a student focus group. The findings revealed a notable change in the relationship between teachers and students within the one-to-one environment. The change existed in the connectivity between the teachers and their students beyond the classroom and school. The researchers concluded that the teachers and their students did have a positive relationship in a one-to-one environment and that relationship depended on the teacher’s ability to engage students using the one-to-one device. The researchers concluded that the one-to-one environment creates an autonomous learning environment for students; teachers and students have a relatedness that extends beyond the traditional boundaries of a school; and a higher level of competency in both teachers and students creates a more engaging classroom. As one-to-one technology environments are becoming more popular across the country, this study contributes to a better understanding of the expected changes in teacher-student relationships before issues of conflict occur.

[1]  Anitha John,et al.  Endangered Minds: Why Children Don't Think-and What We Can Do About It , 2004 .

[2]  Albert D. Ritzhaupt,et al.  Florida’s EETT Leveraging Laptops Initiative and Its Impact on Teaching Practices , 2008 .

[3]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[4]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  Educational technologies and twenty-first century leadership for learning , 2016 .

[5]  Hunter Gehlbach,et al.  Social motivation in the secondary classroom: Assessing teacher-student relationships from both perspectives , 2011 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Boyle How to Prepare a Dissertation Proposal: Suggestions for Students in Education & the Social and Behavioral Sciences (review) , 2005 .

[7]  Robert C. Pianta,et al.  Enhancing Relationships Between Children and Teachers , 1999 .

[8]  Practices and Attitudes of Students and Teachers Using iPads in High School Mathematics Classes , 2015 .

[9]  Heng Ngee Mok Teaching Tip: The Flipped Classroom , 2014, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[10]  Michael Russell,et al.  An AlphaSmart for each student: Do teaching and learning change with full access to word processors? , 2003 .

[11]  T. Oko Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. , 1992 .

[12]  J. Connell,et al.  Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. , 1991 .

[13]  山崎 友子,et al.  産学協同学校教育支援プログラムの事例研究 - アメリカ合衆国におけるノート型パソコン支援プログラム(Notebooks for Schools by Toshiba America Information Systems) - , 2001 .

[14]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[15]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  L. Leung Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research , 2015, Journal of family medicine and primary care.

[17]  Mike Eaton The flipped classroom , 2017, The clinical teacher.

[18]  R. Newman How Self-Regulated Learners Cope with Academic Difficulty: The Role of Adaptive Help Seeking , 2002 .

[19]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[20]  S. Harter,et al.  Development perspectives on the self-system , 1983 .

[21]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Qualitative Research from Start to Finish , 2010 .

[22]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Going One-to-One. , 2006 .

[24]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom , 2003 .

[25]  J. Connell,et al.  Effect of grade retention on self-system processes, school engagement, and academic performance , 1992 .

[26]  Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al.  Supporting Autonomy in the Classroom: Ways Teachers Encourage Student Decision Making and Ownership , 2004 .

[27]  Yong Zhao,et al.  One-to-One Computing: What Does it Bring to Schools? , 2008 .

[28]  David L. Silvernail,et al.  The Impact of Maine's One-to-One Laptop Program on Middle School Teachers and Students , 2004 .

[29]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[30]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  Links between community violence and the family system: evidence from children's feelings of relatedness and perceptions of parent behavior. , 2002, Family process.

[31]  J. Morse Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry , 2015, Qualitative health research.

[32]  B. Tucker The Flipped Classroom: Online Instruction at Home Frees Class Time for Learning , 2012 .

[33]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .