On the 50th anniversary of the first description of a multistage exercise treadmill test: re-visiting the birth of the ‘Bruce protocol’

This calendar year, 2013, marks the 50th anniversary of the publication of an article which, unbeknown to the authors, was the first report of what would become one of the most widely used and researched tests in clinical cardiology throughout the world during the 20th century—the Bruce protocol exercise treadmill test (ETT).1 This editorial describes the historical background to the introduction of the ETT, the rationale for a multistage protocol, the first account of the ‘Bruce protocol’ and provides a brief discussion on the late Professor Robert Bruce himself. Although it had long been known that evaluating a symptomatic patient during exertion might disclose evidence of coronary artery disease, before the advent of the Bruce treadmill test there was no safe, standardised and validated stress protocol that could be used to monitor cardiovascular haemodynamic changes in exercising patients. Master's two-step test,2 a submaximal exercise test for diagnosing ‘coronary insufficiency’ (in which ECGs were recorded during and after a patient repeatedly ascended and descended two steps) was often used, but it was too strenuous for some patients, inadequate for simultaneous assessment of cardiac and respiratory function during exercise and, measured by the energy expenditure per unit of weight, stressed the underweight patient considerably more than the overweight patient.1 Submaximal stress tests were the preferred stress technique; the concept of testing patients to their maximum exercise capacity was almost unthinkable, owing to the perceived risk of complications, a perception reinforced by reports of major complications even during submaximal stress testing.3 Nonetheless, Bruce recognised that many patients were not reliably or reproducibly stressed. Consequently, he tested initially a single-stage treadmill test in thousands of normal volunteers and subsequently, in cardiac patients, proving its feasibility, safety and reproducibility.4 This stress was only moderate for normal subjects and cardiac patients …

[1]  L. Fisher,et al.  Seattle Heart Watch: initial clinical, circulatory and electrocardiographic responses to maximal exercise. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[3]  L. Cobb,et al.  Exertional Hypotension in Cardiac Patients , 1959, Circulation.

[4]  A. Master,et al.  A SIMPLE EXERCISE TOLERANCE TEST FOR CIRCULATORY EFFICIENCY WITH STANDARD TABLES FOR NORMAL INDIVIDUALS , 1929 .

[5]  David J. Feild Guidelines for exercise testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommitte on Exercise Testing). , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  C. G. Blomqvist,et al.  Guidelines for exercise testing. A report of the Joint American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Exercise Testing). , 1986, Circulation.

[7]  Ben A. Lin,et al.  85% of maximal age-predicted heart rate is not a valid endpoint for exercise treadmill testing , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  D. Mark,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  L. Fisher,et al.  Validation of exercise-enhanced risk assessment of coronary heart disease events: longitudinal changes in incidence in Seattle community practice. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  R. Bruce,et al.  Evaluation and significance of physical fitness for moderate work; a study of patients with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of industrial hygiene and occupational medicine.

[11]  A. Moss Introductory Note to a Classic Article by Robert A. Bruce , 2004, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[12]  L. Cobb,et al.  Robert Arthur Bruce, MD: 1916–2004 , 2005 .

[13]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  E. Sowton,et al.  A comparison of the Naughton and modified Bruce treadmill exercise protocols in their ability to detect ischaemic abnormalities six weeks after myocardial infarction. , 1984, European heart journal.

[15]  P Kligfield,et al.  A modified treadmill exercise protocol for computer-assisted analysis of the ST segment/heart rate slope: methods and reproducibility. , 1986, Journal of electrocardiology.

[16]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  B BALKE,et al.  An experimental study of physical fitness of Air Force personnel. , 1959, United States Armed Forces medical journal.

[18]  F. Nagle,et al.  REFINEMENTS IN METHOD OF EVALUATION AND PHYSICAL CONDITIONING BEFORE AND AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. , 1964, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  R. Bruce,et al.  Exercising Testing in Adult Normal Subjects and Cardiac Patients * , 1963, Pediatrics.