Cell-to-cell communication in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: they may be talking, but who's listening?

The closely related enteric bacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium are among the best understood microorganisms, and much of our knowledge of prokaryotic physiology and genetics has derived from their study. Despite their utility as model prokaryotes, however, it is clear that E. coli and S. typhimurium do not represent all aspects of microbial physiology and behavior. One such underrepresented area is that of the microbial cell-cell interaction. There are a variety of microorganisms that have evolved elaborate means by which individual cells communicate and coordinate their actions. Often, these bacteria produce and release extracellular signal molecules that allow them to gauge their own population density and respond by altering expression of specific genes, a process generally described as quorum sensing. Examples of intercellular communication systems include oligopeptide-based signaling used by a variety of Gram-positive bacteria, A factor production during fruiting body development in Myxocccus xanthus, butanolide control of antibiotic biosynthesis in Streptomyces spp., and a volatile fatty acid methyl ester signal that regulates virulence in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum (see refs. 1–4). In Gram-negative bacteria, by far the most common form of quorum sensing is mediated by production and subsequent perception of acylated homoserine lactones (acyl HSLs) (5, 6).

[1]  M. Surette,et al.  Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Silverman,et al.  The luxR gene product of Vibrio harveyi is a transcriptional activator of the lux promoter , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  E. Meighen,et al.  Purification and structural identification of an autoinducer for the luminescence system of Vibrio harveyi. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  E. Ruby,et al.  Lessons from a cooperative, bacterial-animal association: the Vibrio fischeri-Euprymna scolopes light organ symbiosis. , 1996, Annual review of microbiology.

[5]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Self perception in bacteria: quorum sensing with acylated homoserine lactones. , 1998, Current opinion in microbiology.

[6]  G. Dunny,et al.  Cell-cell communication in gram-positive bacteria. , 1997, Annual review of microbiology.

[7]  L. Rothfield,et al.  A factor that positively regulates cell division by activating transcription of the major cluster of essential cell division genes of Escherichia coli. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[8]  K. Nealson,et al.  Bacterial bioluminescence: Isolation and genetic analysis of functions from Vibrio fischeri , 1983, Cell.

[9]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Cross-species induction of luminescence in the quorum-sensing bacterium Vibrio harveyi , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  B. Bassler,et al.  Multiple signalling systems controlling expression of luminescence in Vibrio harveyi: sequence and function of genes encoding a second sensory pathway , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  B. Bassler,et al.  Sequence and function of LuxO, a negative regulator of luminescence in Vibrio harveyi , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  S. Horinouchi,et al.  Autoregulatory factors and communication in actinomycetes. , 1992, Annual review of microbiology.

[13]  J. van Reeuwijk,et al.  Salmonella typhimurium Encodes an SdiA Homolog, a Putative Quorum Sensor of the LuxR Family, That Regulates Genes on the Virulence Plasmid , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  M. Schell,et al.  Identification of 3‐hydroxypalmitic acid methyl ester as a novel autoregulator controlling virulence in Ralstonia solanacearum , 1997, Molecular microbiology.