Comparison of numerical analysis on the downhole flow field for multi-orifice hydrothermal jet drilling technology for geothermal wells

Abstract Newly developed hydrothermal jet drilling technology has the potential of being economically advantageous over conventional drilling techniques for drilling deep wells in hard formations. By applying coiled tubing techniques and modulating fluid media in the bottomhole reaction chamber, there can be a high temperature and high velocity jet striking and conducting heat to break the rock. So far, there has been no specific study on the influence of nozzle structure on the flow field of multiple hydrothermal jets. This paper presents hydrothermal jet models with different numbers of orifices to investigate the features of flow field, carrying capacity, drilling ability and cooling effect. Results show that for two models in the absence of cooling water, the bottomhole center temperature and pressure are higher than the two sides under multiple hydrothermal jets conditions. This is similar to the flow pattern for a single jet. Additionally, for the five-orifice nozzle with cooling water injected, the entire high temperature region is cylindrical. Ambient cooling water envelops the inner hot water. By comparing different models, the five-orifice nozzle model without cooling water shows a circular symmetric distribution of the bottomhole temperature. With cooling water injected, the central high temperature region becomes rectangular, while the margin of the well bottom is cooled by the peripheral cooling water. The bottom rock average temperature in five-orifice model is lower than for the four-orifice model due to more drastic thermal and kinetic transfer between the hydrothermal jet and the cooling water. The five-orifice nozzle model is better than the four-orifice nozzle model in terms of bottomhole temperature, bottomhole pressure and carrying capacity. Therefore, the five-orifice nozzle should be adopted for hydrothermal jet drilling. It is also feasible to pump down relatively high temperature cooling water to guarantee the high temperature downhole environment. Meanwhile, the cooling water pressure should be controlled during the drilling process for better cooling efficiency. All results in this paper are relevant to the parameters design for multi-orifice hydrothermal jet drilling technology.

[1]  M. Młynarczuk,et al.  Rock Cutting By Pulsing Water Jets , 2005 .

[2]  Josette Bellan,et al.  Supercritical (and subcritical) fluid behavior and modeling: drops, streams, shear and mixing layers, jets and sprays , 2000 .

[3]  Yuanbin Li,et al.  New Technique: Hydra-jet Fracturing for Effectiveness of Multi-zone Acid Fracturing on an Ultra Deep Horizontal Well and Case Study , 2012 .

[4]  T. Schulenberg,et al.  Heat transfer at supercritical pressures. Literature review and application to an HPLWR , 2001 .

[5]  P. Rohr,et al.  Numerical analysis of penetration lengths in submerged supercritical water jets , 2013 .

[6]  M. Kubik The Future of Geothermal Energy , 2006 .

[7]  W. Wagner,et al.  The IAPWS Formulation 1995 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Ordinary Water Substance for General and Scientific Use , 2002 .

[8]  William C. Maurer,et al.  Hydraulic Jet Drilling , 1969 .

[9]  P. Rohr,et al.  Simulation of the thermal field of submerged supercritical water jets at near-critical pressures , 2013 .

[10]  A. C. Pols High-Pressure Jet-Drilling Experiments in Some Hard Rocks , 1977 .

[11]  Gensheng Li,et al.  Maximum drillable length of the radial horizontal micro-hole drilled with multiple high-pressure water jets , 2015 .

[12]  Amine Ammar,et al.  Development of a numerical model for the understanding of the chip formation in high-pressure water-jet assisted machining , 2016 .

[14]  H. C. Heard Thermal expansion and inferred permeability of climax quartz monzonite to 300°C and 27.6 MPa , 1980 .

[15]  Chad R. Augustine,et al.  Hydrothermal Spallation Drilling and Advanced Energy Conversion Technologies for Engineered Geothermal Systems , 2009 .