Effects of stimulus probability and task-relevance on event-related potentials.

Stimuli were delivered to 12 subjects in a sequence that included regularly occurring standard tone pips, random warning tone pips, and random while noise bursts. Half the noise bursts were preceded by warning tones (high probability), and half were not (low probability). There were four runs, each having one of two noise burst intensities, and each having the warning tone and noise bursts either both task-relevant to a reaction time task or both task irrelevant. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were obtained by signal averaging in F2, C2, P2 and eye leads. The P3 to the warning tone was largest in P, and was not affected by task relevance. CNVs preceded all the high probability noise bursts. These CNVs had an amplitude of 5μV even when the bursts were task irrelevant. Low probability noise bursts elicited larger P3s in all leads for the task-irrelevant condition, but only in Pz for the task-relevant conditions. In Cz, the amplitudes of NI. P2, and P3 to the high probability. task-relevant noise bursts correlated with the amplitude of the preceding CNV.

[1]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  W. Ritter,et al.  Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Kopell,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation as an Indicator of Sexual Object Preference , 1972, Science.

[4]  J. Ford,et al.  Parameters of temporal recovery of the human auditory evoked potential. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[6]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Motivational determinants of the "contingent negative variation". , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Effect of stimulus uncertainty on the pupillary dilation response and the vertex evoked potential. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  B S Kopell,et al.  Prevalence and methods of control of the cephalic skin potential EEG artifact. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[10]  E. Donchin,et al.  On the independence of the CNV and the P300 components of the human averaged evoked potential. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  J. C. Corby,et al.  Differential contributions of blinks and vertical eye movements as artifacts in EEG recording. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[12]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Effects of stimulus and response contingencies on a surface negative slow potential shift in man. , 1967, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  W. Roth,et al.  Auditory evoked responses to unpredictable stimuli. , 1973, Psychophysiology.

[14]  W. R. Goff,et al.  Distribution of the human average movement potential. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical potentials evoked by confirming and disconfirming feedback following an auditory discrimination , 1973 .

[16]  S Sutton,et al.  Quantitative evoked potential correlates of the probability of events. , 1970, Psychophysiology.

[17]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  P. Björkstrand,et al.  Effect of explicit trial-by-trial information about shock probability in long interstimulus interval GSR conditioning. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.