Analysis of the impact of gas turbine modifications in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants

In an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) plant, the operating environment of the gas turbine (GT) deviates from the design conditions due to its integration with both the gasifier and the air separation unit (ASU). In particular, a trial to design the entire system with low GT–ASU integration would cause a decrease in the compressor surge margin and the turbine blade overheating. In this study, modification of the turbine and compressor to avoid a decrease in the surge margin and overheating was simulated, and the result was compared with the case without modification. The entire IGCC plant was modeled and the full off-design operation of the gas turbine was simulated. Under-firing and a decrease in dilution nitrogen can mitigate the two problems without component modification but inevitably cause a considerable performance penalty in the low integration degree regime. Both turbine modification (annulus area increase) and compressor modification (increase in the surge pressure ratio) enabled a continuous increase in power and efficiency with decreasing integration degree. In the very low integration degree regime, the power benefits of the two modifications were similar and considerable. A sensible power boost can be achieved if the turbine coolant modulation can be adopted instead of under-firing in modification strategies.

[1]  E. O. Oluyede,et al.  Fundamental Impact of Firing Syngas in Gas Turbines , 2007 .

[2]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Turbine Configuration on the Performance of Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines , 1995 .

[3]  Ricardo Chacartegui,et al.  Gas and steam combined cycles for low calorific syngas fuels utilisation , 2013 .

[4]  Pei Liu,et al.  Operation window and part-load performance study of a syngas fired gas turbine , 2012 .

[5]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Performance evaluation of integrated gasification solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine systems including carbon dioxide capture , 2011 .

[6]  C. Cormos Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS) , 2012 .

[7]  C. Bouallou,et al.  Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal , 2008 .

[8]  Zheng Li,et al.  Efficiency of wet feed IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) systems with coal–water slurry preheating vaporization technology , 2013 .

[9]  Bernd Meyer,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage Power Plants : Effects of ASU Integration on IGCC Performance and Gas Turbine Operation , 2008 .

[10]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Influence of system integration options on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant , 2009 .

[11]  M. Liszka,et al.  Parametric study of GT and ASU integration in case of IGCC with CO2 removal , 2012 .

[12]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Effects of syngas type on the operation and performance of a gas turbine in integrated gasification combined cycle , 2011 .

[13]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion , 2011 .

[14]  Francesco Casella,et al.  Dynamic modeling of IGCC power plants , 2012 .

[15]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Performance analysis of a syngas-fed gas turbine considering the operating limitations of its components , 2010 .

[16]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Performance evaluation of atmospheric biomass integrated gasifier combined cycle systems under different strategies for the use of low calorific gases , 2007 .

[17]  Anna Skorek-Osikowska,et al.  Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems. , 2012 .

[18]  Hartmut Spliethoff,et al.  Assessment of oxy-fuel, pre- and post-combustion-based carbon capture for future IGCC plants , 2012 .

[19]  Richard A. Dennis,et al.  Development of Baseline Performance Values for Turbines in Existing IGCC Applications , 2007 .